Traditional Portfolio Strategy -- Are You Kidding?
It is difficult for me to express how upset I am with investors being misled by
traditional portfolio strategy. Let me state for the record: there is no such thing
as a diversified portfolio when most stocks and bonds represent companies or municipalities
that are dependent on federal government funds. In addition, there is a difference
between a traditional business cycle and a financial coup d'etat.
Finally, if the rule of law is not available to ensure functioning markets, all bets
are off. There are some things that even zero percent interest rates and an infinite
amount of loans from the Fed and the Treasury can't solve.
To illustrate, have a look at these stories posted at my blog:
I'll be discussing this subject in greater detail tonight on The Solari Report conference
call: Dec 18 at 9PM EST.
In our "Ask Catherine" segment, subscribers have asked, "How much US
debt is really outstanding?" We'll talk about collateral and securities fraud
and how it connects to one of this weeks biggest stories: why the Fed refuses to disclose
information about its $2 trillion dollars of loans:
In this week's "Movers and Shakers," I'll be talking with investigative
reporter Jon Rappoport about the challenges created by fluoride and chlorine in your
water, why you should avoid vaccines, and the importance of keeping your immune system
strong. Finally, in "Let's Go the Movies," we will be discussing one of
my favorite movies -- Enemy of the State -- and what it can teach you about navigating
in a world defined by economic warfare and corruption.
If you're not a subscriber yet, you can learn more about The
Solari Report and subscribe here:
I hope you'll join us.
-- Catherine Austin Fitts
|
