From Ask Catherine: On Disinformation

73 Comments

  1. Sounded as if there are two separate arenas in your problem. One is on financial matters directly I.e. trustworthy investments. The other i.e. Greg Hunter, the dollar collapse is more of an effort to determine an end point to the madness. Your experience does give people confidence and your insights valuable. Never invest, but just as vetting sources for investing seems more than reasonable, advice on signposts that are most important to watch for would be best for the madness watchers. (Watch Greg regularly).Marie.

    1. Love Greg to pieces. Lots of great things to learn from him. We maintain a New Media list that we publish in the News Trends and Stories section of the recent Wrap Up. These are people we admire, work with, support. USA Watch Dog is on the list!

  2. You might not be surprised to hear my suggestion, but … it is a matter of education in combination with wanting to be a responsible adult in difficult times. Most of us have been raised in the mind-controlled capitalistic world where you constantly look for opportunity. However, we need to realize that the system is rigged, every opportunity for you comes at a price to others. A lot of the disinformation plays into this conditioning – take the vaccine and YOU will be safe, invest in this and YOU will be rich. We obviously need to navigate our way in difficult times, but we really need to commit to the lollypop-index and figure out which investment of time and money delivers BOTH objectives: personal safety and an improving lollypop-index. A strong focus on these will, i believe, automatically condition us to see through 95% of disinformation. The remaining 5%, we need to keep each other sharp :-).

  3. I needed to hear this! Some of us have the need of wanting to be on a winning team, battling the “evil cabal” and getting our country, community, etc. back to the Constitution. It’s exactly like you say, they have “military-grade, mind control technology.” I confess that I have been lazy and didn’t perform due dilliegence and often may follow a crowd. Perhaps, we need a category called “Dumpster” with titles of Disinformation topics we agree on, (and we use it to help others in the process). Thank you!

  4. I really appreciate this look at the past.

    I worry that a non-trivial part of the problem is that for many people information is still very tribal. Because someone claims to want the same things of us it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking they’re a friend and can be trusted. The biggest trouble is that as you point out even competent & trustworthy people can be mislead.

    There’s another “please don’t fight” dynamic, where people want to see all the people they listen to “get along”. Not only that but they also interpret disagreement over a topic as an outright attack. I think it is important for people to de-personalize information as much as possible.

    I think an emphasis on ‘red lines’ is important.
    Establishing guard rails can be useful. Things like: “Nobody is coming to save us, we have to do it ourselves” can filter a great deal of hope porn. Another example of a “red line” would be how you insist we need to prevent an “all digital financial system”, this itself forces people into a frame where they have to re-evaluate various options.

    1. Gabriel, good points. Thinking about the efficacy of time spent on “prevention,” Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD both write of a co-existent “breakaway culture.” Yet we are given no instruction/background on how they managed to survive and thrive. I have to wonder how people survive wars when so many die.

    2. The “please don’t fight dynamic“ rang a bell. I was in a discussion with several people last week about transgender ideology. And one person said that it is important for us to understand transgender and make them comfortable and get along with them.

      I had previously spoken out with emphasis on how dangerous it is to individuals, especially children, as well as society and this is the response elicited.

      1. I can certainly imagine, Richard, growing up as a young person being a girl wanting to be a boy, as I was a tomboy. But I never connected it to my genitals! and I had brothers. One can be girlish or boyish without going to such extremes, one would think.

        1. I’ve been putting together my thoughts on the gender issue since that discussion. I append some of them here though it be longer than I like for a discussion board.

          Homosexual and Transgender Ideologies

          I. Sex biology is innate and purposeful. It cannot be changed by ideological allegiance and medical science. A man cannot become a woman and a woman cannot become a man. Union of man with man and woman with woman can never equal the effectiveness of heterosexual marriage.

          A. “The male and female derivations of human gender are truly equal but differential—hence complemental—to one another by creative design…. We are created equal in spirit and aspiration; but always will we be separated by biology and mind.

          B. “The supreme dependence of men and women on shared co-operation is divinely intended to greatly enhance their mutual potentials for social, intellectual, emotional, and spiritual growth.”

          C. “In its full and essential nature, humankind is dually differentiated according to function, awareness, and behavior response. Male and female are perfectly equal in mind endowment and spiritual status, but they remain individually supreme in their own personal domains of activity as these are “determined by biologic differentiation and by mental dissimilarity” [UB 84:5:13 (938:3)]. Practically regarded, men and women are representative of “two distinct varieties of the same species living in close and intimate association” [UB 84:6:3 (938:7)].

          II. Sociology of sexual identity
          A. Family depends on male-female parents which provides social stability for society. Civilization depends on the family unit.
          B. Homosexuality and transgender identification are less than ideal for individuals and society.

          After discussing the spiritual and material causes of these ideologies becoming widespread I conclude:

          IV. The conclusion of this presentation on sexual identity is that the perpetrators of this fraud against humanity must be opposed. And that takes courage in the face of woke fundamentalism. One must be willing to lose esteem, rewards, money, physical freedom, and even life for the sake of the truth. While short-term expediency may make life easier, it will not go well for the soul.

          If you have made it this far in a too long comment, I hope it has been worthwhile Caroline.

          1. Well, Richard, I appreciate that you have given this issue considerable thought. From what I’ve learned, homosexuals and transgenders have been around for a very long time.

            Although I’ve never discussed this with gay friends growing up, I finally came to think that homosexuality is the result of abuse as a child, even if not remembered. For men, I think, it is an imprinting mechanism that harkens back to the body’s involuntary response to their “first experience.” For women, I tend to think it is a reactionary response to the violent penetration of their body, quite different to a man’s.

            And then think of the eunichs in the courts of emperors who were “transgendered.” Today, it appears, transgendered people are being made to emulate the baphomet, as well as to contribute to the sterility agenda. We are blessed to appreciate who we are and to feel “at home” in our God-given, natural bodies.

  5. Thank you for this, the keywords sparked knowing for Me here. The vivid detailed description of the control grid makes seeing it easier, many types of sight.
    The way you characterize situations and label them make it easy to filter and file my own life events better.

    On a separate topic. Catherine, Have you looked at the work put out by :Russell-Jay: Gould? Look at lastflagstanding.com and :War-Castles. Channel on youtube. This has been hands down the most advanced and thorough, in depth explanation, of postal mechanics, maritime shipping, civil procedure (courts), international treaty and trust law, grammar on contract, actually correct history of the (former) United States…. I think it’d be great for you two to do an interview.

    Canada was in international bankruptcy and fame out of it in 2017? I think. The implicationsvare massive for how the structures of the control grid is set up, from nativity.

    I will post a link directly for people to listen and discern for themselves:

    https://youtu.be/u5HrrGUQeUQ

    1. Dear Andrew, thank you for your posting. I’ve known about the Strawman for a number of years but without a deep understanding of diagramming sentences, it’s difficult to get a handle on it. And as Russell recounts, it takes superhuman courage to challenge our birth certificate and regain sovereignty as an individual. To learn from Russell that in 1999, when the US loan to the international bankers came due again at the 70-year mark, and the US went bankrupt, making our birth certificates void, albeit for only a short period, we had the chance to CLAIM OUR SOVEREINGTY, is astounding. What a missed opportunity due to our naive ignorance and bad education! If you haven’t already seen my earlier post, I recommend Clif High’s walkthrough of the history of US LAW and the US debt at https://www.bitchute.com/video/nTuQoDQt23hf/ It presents another piece of this puzzle.

      1. This first video was Russell’s own battle with the system.

        In this next video, we learn from Russell’s in-depth study on banking, postal, military and court mechanics on why it works the way it works, the structure, how the structure worked, and then how to build it back together through CORRECT GRAMMAR to give fairness to all people on the planet.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpFzt77huxc/watch?v=fpFzt77huxc

        10:29) We learn that Ben Franklin was a French lawyer working for the British Crown to capture the United States of America. [I imagine the mind, without film, radio, and television, allowed lawyers (masters in the study of language) to concoct all sorts of secret codes with language.]

        Russell figured out that the POST OFFICE (Ben Franklin first US Postmaster General) was the central control to authorize the corporate structures of government, and the FLAG was the foundation of the construct of contracts.

        And when he discovered that the US was going bankrupt in 1999, he went into action to safeguard the Constitution and the Flag. In November 1999, when there was a debate about who won the election, leaving the country “without a country,” Russell was prepared.

        What a fascinating story!

    2. I’ve wondered about him too. He seems to have a third parallel universe of sorts, although I’m not sure how becoming part of such (that is, state national) fixes the national/global monetary issues?

  6. Oh and, the timelines of how the US corporate charter for the bankruptcy since 1775, ending 3rd moratorium in 1999, coincides very closely to when Mr. Global started to decide to siphon it out the back door…. Because there is no longer any continuance for the termsvof the bankruptcy charter, no terms to elect a CEO on the financial trust(president USA), no terms for postal mechanics(shipment of goods, services, vessels=contracts)… Therefore this “wild west” type environment.

  7. Really Catherine, I have been thinking for hours to come up with some reasonable answers to your query. I don’t think many people are aware there are two fields we humans can resonate with. A technological resurected field and a natural field that is of the earth that protects and nurtures us.

    That technological field promotes your feelings on concepts. You have to have deep feelings about poverty, health ect. When we see a poverty stricken person, society walks by, when in an astma attack during a pandemic, society demands a mask ect. Judicial multi-nationals are endowed with personhood, humans are devorced from personhood. In other words, it’s function is to be anti-human!

    The natural field of the earth does the opposite. One cares directly for the poor person and or sick person. You are directly tied to the problem at hand, not the collector of the collection box and or the receiver thereof!

    Insted of drowning in feelings try to feel the differences between being bound with earth’s natural field versus the technological field.

    Then do the most important, make your choice.

    Solari offers a buffet of ways to go the natural way of things. And yes, it is an ardues road with many ways to get there but I believe it is worth it.

    1. Yes, me too. The more of us to help each other, the easier and most deeply satisfying the path. Just had coffee with two very wise people. So great.

      1. Catherine, thank you for sharing your experiences, as always. You are a great teacher.

        Might you consider Andrew Call’s suggestion of learning about Russel Jay Gould and making him HERO OF THE WEEK to help bring him to further attention? His story is truly remarkable.

        By the way, Clif High holds you in high esteem and develops your “cash” plan on his recent post, “Be Uprising.” He’s just such a character.

        1. Caroline, thank you for the support on that. The videos, there are 10 parts to tgat documentary, however every one has vital informationm. Most I have shared with stop at 2 or 3, right before the specifics of dates and mechanics of financial trusts is explained.

          There is something called a Claim of the Life. This is a claim that positions oneself as a fact outside the fraudulent-grammar void:birth-certificate, and creates a position upon which other claims can be made. The interesting thing here is that there are specific, actionable steps for any citizen to take, to claim control of their usuries.

          Such as having a bank account but becoming the postmaster of the contract of usury(terms and conditions). There is an absolutrly brilliant explanation, briefly stated by a Canadian, :Gordon-Michael: Schiller. Link below.
          https://youtu.be/VEU8Ll-4C7U

          1. Hi Andrew,

            I did not mean any disrespect. I am a very down to earth person. I believe God’s earth is most beautifull and I like planting my feet firmly on terra firma. People get so invested in “mental constructs” and fight tooth and nail for it. It simply baffles me, nothing more, nothing less motivated me to write my little piece.

        2. Hi Caroline,

          I did listen to Andrew Call’s youtube link from Russel Jay Gould. What I perceive from the Western world today (US + EU) is total lawlessness. I don’t think rearanging sentences, and putting quantum before grammar, is going to change that unfolding lawlessness.

          When bullets fly, dodging might be more effective. Quantum grammar sounds like re-arranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic.

          1. Just as Catherine said that all the ‘elites’ know that the prosperity comes from the equity that comes from Life, and that money is simply an exchange format that can be pronted….. And many stories of people being bluntly honest when it comes down to the core of a topic (reference: when Catherine gave a speech and the investor said “they’re pulling the money out starting in the fall..” a blunt, honest, matter-of-fact statement…) ….. The personal experiences of judges and police respecting honesty, forthrightness, correctness, self-respect, due diligence, etc..
            That there are enough people on planet, with enough of a spark of goodness in them, to build a bunch of personal lifeboats ripped from the boards of the titanic even as it does a slow controlled sink, even if insane people with coats are running around with syringes, or silent mercs pointing scalar beamweapons from a distance, that we can work together to build our own vessels that can navigate correctly, and at some point cooperate to build a better designed large boat we can collectively stand on, dock to, even if using scraps salvaged from the sinking, doomed, “Titanic.”
            That this takes oodles of resiliency, discipline, courage, education, self will, positive attitude, self responsibility, cooperation, and persistence. That it can be done.

            Maybe there’s things I don’t onow about the control grid and how hard it hits. But, maybe those people don’t know what it is like to have a living connection to Source, to God, to Allah, to the Creator, and don’t know how many fail safe systems God programmed into the Planetary, Solar, Galactic, Metagalactic, Cosmayic grids, chakras, crystal seals, and all the other spiritual anatomies.

            “They” just don’t have access to all the information. Not to argue. It’s just simply, if God will allow the ship to sink, and free will that everyone can make choices to sink or swim, and that those honestly making efforts and being forthright will be navigated out of the mess, to eventual safety…
            And assuming someone who is making the choice to live, to be good, great,…. When is a good time to take responsibility for one’s ability to navigate? The soul goes through stargates either way at some points, with or without the body.
            I’m not perfect, and maybe I’m just shifting a chair around here, but I was inspired to type. Thank you.

          2. The Titanic, indeed. Yes, Alexandra, I certainly agree. I found his story useful simply to learn how the legal system worked. And then to learn that this man figured out that the country was going into bankruptcy in 1999 and that a president would not be elected on Election Day. That he figured out the grammar code and afterwards put it to the real life test to see how it worked at such great cost to himself; the enormous effort and courage. But, of course, you are correct. It is senseless to think we can do anything about it. It is not actionable at all. I thought it was just such a historic story that everyone should, at least, come to know.

          3. LOL
            I do agree that understanding the legal system is quite helpful. But I have never known the leadership to respect any legal system at the end of the day.

Comments are closed.