66 Comments

1. Some powerful rap

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYJBxlpfgxo

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9a_P0evO7Y

2. If anyone is looking for educational resources for homeschooling that cost little-to-nothing, I recommend starting here:

   https://amblesideonline.org

   (It does benefit one very much to read Charlotte Mason’s books on educational philosophy if embarking on this method but that is not mandatory. You can likely find them in your library system.)

   I can testify to good results from this approach because I see them in my own children (oldest age 10, homeschooled from the beginning), and my wife works tirelessly to take the children through it week in and week out.

   You have the option with that curriculum to use many online resources to keep costs down and the suggested reading (and listening) – while it is far more than I’ve seen in any other – is incredibly rich. It does require a considerable non-negotiable investment of your time and energy as the teacher, but the results are worth it.

3. Book on aluminum. Very good book.
   Imagine You Are an Aluminum Atom: Discussions with Mr. Aluminum by Christopher Exley, PhD
   There is aluminum in some of the injections. Dr. Exley ran into problems with research funding and the university when he connected aluminum and injections.

4. The discussion around the gene pool reminds me of a book written for kids. The Giver by Lois Lowry. About 200 pages. A quick read as it was written for 11-14 year olds. It also was made into a movie.

5. ‘Pfizer Using Aborted Fetuses for Vaccines’ https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/vaccine/pfizer-using-aborted-fetus-for-vaccines/

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_J5LlOxku4

   Frenchman trolling police with Star Wars Storm Trooper theme…

7. Catherine. It’s useful to seperate the terms crypto and bitcoin in your mind. Crypto (all the other coins) have some form of central control where they can be attacked or seized and put out of business. Bitcoin has no headquarters and no executives. No changes can be made to the code (freely downloadable) without the nodes’ (distributed bitcoin server operators) approval. The inventor(s) created miracoulous code that combines scarcity with transparency (blockchain) portability and permissionless operation with full encryption. The software appears bulletproof as it has been running without incident since 2009. It is completely independent of the banking system. Hardware wallets, aka cold storage, provides secure cryptographic blockchain access. No smart users leave their assetts on an exchange any longer than necessary.

   “They” can cancel us with their financial powers at any time. “They” can track bitcoin transactions via the blockchain as they occur but they can’t block the transfers themselves which seems pretty handy for the end times. Here is a link to a good comparison berween bitcoin and “alt coins” / crypto.

   https://youtu.be/ZK8ebS51kU8

   1. > The software appears bulletproof as it has been running without incident since 2009

      https://meltdownattack.com/
      https://www.csoonline.com/article/3247868/spectre-and-meltdown-explained-what-they-are-how-they-work-whats-at-risk.html

      “Spectre and Meltdown are the names given to a trio of variations on a vulnerability that affects nearly every computer chip manufactured in the last 20 years. The flaws are so fundamental and widespread that security researchers are calling them catastrophic.”

      That happened in 2018, affecting computers going back to the 1990s.

      A fun theory about Bitcoin: https://bitcoinisablackop.wordpress.com/

      “…released into the wild at around the same time as Stuxnet … any “bitcoin” transaction can use the full mining power of the bitcoin network as a brute force attack on any public/private key pair to enter the transaction into the “blockchain” … a means to outsource brute force attacks on encrypted transmissions to reduce the costs of doing so in house with a gamification/reward system for bitcoin miners.”

      Stacking functions. What do bitcoiners say? “Stacking sats”?

      1. Interesting theory but if they really had the ability to hack the bitcoin protocol and corrupt the bitcoin blockchain what are they waiting for? Now we see a runaway train (from the central bank perspective) in a position to completely demonetize the entire global fiat system with a permissionless, secure, independent, decentralized and highly distributed store of value and currency system growing at an annual compound growth rate of nearly 200% over the past 10 years. It’s put up or shut up time for the naysayers IMHO.

         1. As the article states to those who read it, there’s no hacking involved. It’s about the design. If someone created bitcoin for secondary purposes they don’t need to “hack” it.

            Should one trust “black box” tech, whether used for finance or biotech (vax)?

            If bitcoin is being used for secondary purposes, then it would be GOOD for speculators but (depending on the secondary purposes) possibly BAD for karma. Trade according to the metric you are seeking to maximize.

            1. And for heavens sake keep accurate off line records.

            2. Bitcoin is not “black box tech” since it is completely open source and anyone can check it for backdoors, etc.

      2. > … any “bitcoin” transaction can use the full mining power of the bitcoin network as a brute force attack on any public/private key pair to enter the transaction into the “blockchain”

         I have no idea what the author is referring to with the term “brute force attack”. Bitcoin mining means executing the SHA-256 hash function over and over, until one lucky miner finds a block hash that starts with a given number of zeroes. How many zeroes exactly is dictated by the mining difficulty, which in turn is adjusted roughly every 2 weeks so that the average time between blocks is about 10 minutes. Right now, a block hash is required to start with at least 19 hexadecimal zeroes, which leaves 45 hex digits that can take any value from 0-F. As an example, here’s a block that was found a few minutes ago:

         https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000009ada67b20e848cd5e81173360e4bbb287a3d8cc3cfdde

         Since a block hash is required to start with a number of zeroes and the rest of the digits can take any value, you can’t really use the BTC network to brute force a hash. Brute forcing would require a found hash to exactly match all 64 hexadecimal digits. Just matching 19 digits is useless, never mind the fact that the BTC protocol requires them to all be equal to zero. Makes no sense if you’re trying to find data that leads to a specific SHA-256 hash.

         The author also makes a number of other claims with no detail how he arrived at his conclusions. Until he explains this much better, it’s impossible to have a rational discussion.

Comments are closed.