A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: The Crime Wave Is Not Over

Interview: Local Investing with Michael H. Shuman

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


102 Comments

  1. Catherine, news from Alberta.

    The federal government has quietly begun the creation of Personal Information Banks (PIB) to collect and store data on Canadians. Categories of information include biometrics (DNA, blood type, eye/facial scan, fingerprints, etc), personal biography, medical history, financial history, credit information, etc…

    The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has added it to their Privacy Terms so that in order to submit an application for benefits you must click that you agree to terms including “…being described in Personal Information Bank (under development)” in order to submit your application. It is also a term in the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) application and will likely will be a term of condition for submitting your income tax return.

    In other words, Premiers Moe and Smith will agree to digital IDs while deceiving the public.

    2. Hi Elisabeth, thanks for posting this. Do you know where I would find the details from the CRA? Was looking around on the website and didn’t see it.

    3. You can just mail in your form for benefits, you do not have to do online. The website states that it will take 4 months by paper to get approved…but you can backdate your request date to start. I sent in my CPP by paper and it was approved in 5 days. I did not see any of the PIB stuff posted that you refer to so it must of came in after November 2022. I was going to apply online through Service Canada and authentication was done in the past using my banking information…that changed in November. It goes to your bank but there is a new agreement that you must agree to with Interac and it basically says you have to agree to anything they want to do in the future. Then I learned that Interac signed an agreement with the federal in October 2022 to be the purveyors of digital ID in Canada.
      https://www.interac.ca/en/content/news/interac-acquires-securekey-digital-id-services-for-canada-five-things-you-need-to-know/
      more scary stuff with Interac:
      https://www.interac.ca/en/content/ideas/collaborating-with-interac-get-to-know-the-innovation-partnerships-team/

  2. Question: The train derailments in Ohio. Could it be related to the fact that Cleveland is slated as the first Smart City in the States?

    1. Or is it Columbus that won the Smart City Competition back in 2016? Also have seen Lima, Ohio slated as a smart city?

    3. After having lived through Hurricane Katrina and witnessing first hand the aftermath of it which included a huge and hotly contested eminent domain land grab, my vote is that this is likely a land grab a la Agenda 21 aka Agenda 2030. I hope I’m wrong.

      1. stacked-function: land-grab + decimation of food chain (farmland, meat processing factories, heirloom seed growers) + implementation of digital ID / health tracking / mandatory (future) mRNA vaccination for chemical poisoning.

  4. South Dakota HB 1193, will end up on Gov. Noem’s desk soon. Will she veto? There is contention regarding the fact that it will eliminate the use of Bitcoin et all, but not CBDC’s! So, it looks very suspicious…and many people are getting riled up about it. Noem has indicated she’s getting lots of pressure from the left.
    https://cointelegraph.com/news/proposed-south-dakota-amendment-to-ucc-would-prohibit-cryptocurrencies-but-not-cbdc
    BTW – South Dakota Bankers Association is supporting this bill….

      3. Guess what Catherine? Good news…..Noem vetoed 1193, yesterday March 9th. (Will post the article in Subs. Input.)

    3. And “foreign governments” would include El Salvador, at least for now.
      And how are these “controllable electronic records” any different from, say, bank accounts, or even title deeds held in an electronic database?

      1. According to the revised UCC, they are based on possession of the private key. It appears that even in the case of theft of the private key, possession of the key means control of the electronic record. Unclear what happens when two parties have the private key, i.e. original owner + thief.

    4. please don’t refer to people as from the left or right. this segregation has never made any sense to me, and during the recent 2 or 3 years has become even more pointless.

  5. CDC Gets Put on Notice With a Grand Jury Request for Criminal Data Fraud

    I haven’t heard of this before and it is interesting in terms of grand Push Back in US: https://www.beyondthecon.com/

    Here is the interview I listened to: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/09/cdc-gets-put-on-notice-with-a-grand-jury-request-for-criminal-data-fraud-video/ref/8/

    It shows up the US Constitution quite well about which I thought Jon Rappoport will be happy and I wondered what John Titus’s reaction is to their efforts.

  6. 1922 Revision of the International Sanitary Convention of 1912
    Do you see anything interesting in this 100-yr-old article?

    Sasha Latypova

    Mar 3

    This post is related to my previous post on the topic of “pandemics”:

    International sanitary conventions started in 1851. pdf available at link

    There were 14 of these conventions every few years, attended by representatives of several countries. The purpose of these conventions was to negotiate rules and procedures for prevention of spread of these illnesses via shipping and trade. For this reason what is currently called “infectious diseases” subject to these conventions (like plague, cholera, typhus, yellow fever, etc.) were called “conventional diseases”. They were not referred to as infectious diseases at the time, and at least one source that I have – a book published on this topic by the Russian (Soviet Union) Academy of Science in 1970 stated that there was no known mechanism of cholera transmission at the time.

    The International Sanitary Conventions were the predecessor to the WHO which was founded in 1948.

    Here is the article describing the proceedings of the 1922 Convention published by the British Medical Journal on July 8, 1922. Please post your observations in comments.

    https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/1922-revision-of-the-international

    In an interview Dr. Cowan did of Howdie Mikowski he reffered to the medical cons that originated in the mid 19th century. That would be the germ theory etc.
    It seems the real push was prior to 1913. We all know what happened then.

Comments are closed.