103 Comments

  1. 01:37- …the Central Banks’…inability to market their excuses for what created inflation…the World knows…as long as they think the Fed is gonna come out the winner, the people will play along, as soon as there’s blood in the water…

    Yep: me [humanity] at my finest. God help me!

  2. Catherine, you say you are looking for someone who can present on Solari regarding how to protect ourselves technologically. I would imagine Edward Snowden is a hot button issue to ask him to do so, so then what about Gary McKinnon? assuming he has not been assassinated.

      1. The challenge with outliers like Snowden and McKinnon carrying a message is that average people assume they don’t have a comparable threat model, instead of internalizing that “control is one person at a time”.

        It’s very expensive to fully protect any individual, but if we work together, we can collectively impose larger costs on would-be local and remote adversaries. Target the adversary’s business models and supply chains, including hypothetical app-based underground networks (think Fiverr, TaskRabbit or Uber for criminals/stringers) and boycott service/software/hardware vendors with known weaknesses. Buy better locks for physical doors. Use a router that can run open-source software and ad-tracker-blocking. Put the router in a small padlocked electronics enclosure to protect against local tampering from unscheduled visitors. Be wary of USB keyboard-video docks that can be subject to wireless implants. Use a local NAS with open-source software and on-disk encryption. Avoid all wireless. Use shielded enterprise-grade wired cables with grounded patch panels or switches. Shield at least bedroom and office walls. Have multiple air quality monitors and/or periodic water tests for unexpected substances. For padlocks, use high-quality combination locks (e.g. Sargent & Greenleaf) where you have the change key to rotate the combination locally, mitigating the threat of shipment interdiction.

        Investing in paper-based culture is a good start, e.g. nice pens and stationery, (re)learning to draw/sketch/trace/color. It also has the energetic advantage of sending positive vibes in the direction of art and imagination, instead of fear or (at best) stoic defensive warrior energy towards technology supply chains with asymmetric advantages.

        And remember, compromised technology works perfectly well for sending misinformation to adversaries, known and unknown!

  3. Any ideas? Why does Moderna receive so little publicity / heat compared to Pfizer?

    Could they not also be forced to disclose their injection-test documentation? Is there a political element at play? Are Pfizer not the chosen/protected ones? (BioNtech is in Germany, Pfizer’s CEO Bourla is Greek) After all, Moderna + NIAID + Ralph Baric were names on the December 2019 Materials Transfer Agreement for the “mRNA Coronavirus vaccine candidates”. Baric is on utube “receiving” the Moderna jab (without a needle in sight) and Patent-searching on the originally declared C19 sequence resulted in hits on Moderna patents.

    1. Good bank / bad bank.

      Is there an undeclared conflict between US and EU/Germany?

      1. thanks Rich.

        “German” BioNTech was surely always set up such that it could fail on behalf of another firm. Similarly, if Moderna blew up, it wouldn’t take down other product lines with it. Sure, BioNTech “partnered” with Pfizer, a USA company, but maybe “the wrong people” got too much control of the money flow (compared to Moderna.) Maybe Bill’s earning well from Pfizer, but not Fauci? I suspect that virtually nobody knows the exact details of the third party IP costs which BioNTech/Moderna/AZ have to pay.

        Seems like Germany is the dog on USA’s leash. Twenty years ago, Chancellor Schröder would have told the US to back the heck off ‘cos he would’ve wanted the Nordstream2 running. My guess was that Merkel Is “inner circle”, and set up the Nordstream2 deal so she could shut down the NuclearPower, always knowing that it would be stopped at some point. Scholz quite probably wasn’t in on it, saw all the implications, but folded after the leash was jerked.

  4. Del deserves the hero of the week for that discussion. He had a portion of the discussion at the beginning of Episode 269 at the Highwire (7:45 to 25:00). He was at his best.
    In the last ten years, I’ve read more than three dozen books on injections and viruses. That doesn’t include PDF papers and podcasts. Many, many hours. I am not a scientist or expert (just a momma/grandmomma bear) but I can hold my own on the topic…and, I know for a fact that I can hold my own with the nurses and doctors that I personally know. They won’t discuss.
    I have watched interviews he and others have done with most of that panel and have had some frustration with the double-speak and/or omissions of those with raised hands. And, I was disappointed Del let a lot of it pass without comment. With the team and research he has, it was hard to believe he didn’t know.
    There is no longer any question about what Del (and, his team) know and understand. They are smart and brave. And, they give strength and hope to those of us who have been trying to bring awareness to our personal circles for years.
    What a difference the last two years have made!

    1. Yes. I believe Del let the hand raisers speak for themselves – and in doing so, let the audience see their individual points of view clearly. More powerful for their points of view speak for themselves.

      1. In case you haven’t gotten a hold of it, here’s a link to the specific Better Way Conference segment in Episode 269 of the Highwire where Del “goes off script” and asks the panel their thoughts on vaccines. It seems that the segment doesn’t inlcude all of the comments from the panel, though:
        https://thehighwire.com/videos/del-debates-geert/

        He introduces the clip at 4:00.

          1. I follow The Highwire closely, along with Solari and Corbett. If I come across it somewhere or if Del mentions access to the full vid on the show, I’ll pass it along.

  5. As a vet I do not give my animals more than 1 or 2 vaccines at any one time. This includes dogs, cats, horses.

    1. We stopped vaccinating our animals when we stopped jabbing our kids, 2000ish. Nobody has been sick since. We have a 15 year old dog that you would think is a puppy. We have not been to a vet or a doc since.

  6. The story of the nurse and toxicity of a spilled vaccine reminded me of a conversation I once had with a relative who is a practicing dentist. I asked him could throw away a mercury filling (that’s a more appropriate name, not silver) after removing it from a patient’s mouth into the wastepaper basket? He then said, “Oh no, there is a strict hazardous material process we must follow.” I then waited to see if he realized what he just said — but nothing. And, I was too polite to asked the obvious question “why is it so dangerous out of the mouth but benign in it?”

  7. In the midst of all the gloom and doom about the markets and the economy, it occurs to me that what is not being factored in is the very thing that makes us Americans, and that is our unparalleled creativity in improvising new business, means and ways to do things. In fact, right before our eyes, the Misinformation Administration crashed and burned entirely under the weight of the ridicule that was brought to bear on it as a result of the internet and the freedom of speech it has facilitated even in spite of the efforts of tech giants and left-leaning fascists. We do well to know that the internet itself, far from being the brainchild of “Prince” Albert Gore, was actually a project of DARPA, a close relative of the “intelligence” services which now constantly afflict our freedoms. The Jankowitz hijinx featuring a hideous Mary Poppins was literally an institutional shark- jumping that could not be borne by even the most dull-witted member of the population. The grotesque spectacle of Uvalde’s youthful carnage, far from steeling men’s resolve towards gun control, instead invited more skepticism about a subject that should be by rights, sacrosanct but whose advertised circumstances were too bizarre to be accepted as legitimate.

    I contend that once people realize that they cannot rely on the infrastructure, whether in the public square, on the news media, the markets or even in the local government, they invent new workarounds and markets that will serve their needs. I believe this is already happening for some years now, and should conditions warrant, will become thousands or millions of going direct resets outside of the control of the globalists. People will form coops for food and defense irrespective of government. At that point, it will take abject slaughter to bring it to heel. Mr Global and his friends know that once the dogs of genocide are let slip, all will be fair on both sides, with the numbers favoring the masses.

    Deus ex machina.

    1. By Chuck Lorre

      I believe that Newton’s first law of motion is the reason we will emerge from our current economic woes. That law states that an object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. How does that relate to the financial #$%*storm we’re now cowering under? Allow me to explain.

      There are slightly less than seven billion people on this planet. Assuming that roughly half that number are either too young, too old, too lazy, or too loaded to work, that still leaves almost three and a half billion people getting up in the morning to chase the almighty dollar, the transcendent rupee, the zen yen,the dear ol’ euro, the what’s goin’ on yuan, the… well, you get the idea.

      Now, call me crazy (and many have called me far worse), but I happen to think that three and a half billion motivated people is one big damn object in motion. And the only thing acting against that object is the friction caused by a small bunch of greedy, dumbass, screw-the-pooch, Ivy League pot stickers (the unbalanced force).

      I therefore assert that the unbalanced force (you know who you are, shame on you), will eventually be overwhelmed by the object in motion (three and a half billion people with pluck, aka pluckers), thus allowing the object in motion to continue its relentless journey forward, thriving and conniving until it is once again slowed down by other unbalanced forces, or a very large meteorite.

      Or a plague. Or fundamentalists with nukes. Or atmosphere-eating nanobots. Or a super volcano. Or Skynet. Or Cylons.

      2. I am most worried about Cylons in nylons. You would have to imagine that transgender robots will be a key component of an army of war-fighting automatons, much as are their biological analogues in the American military.

        2. On a positive note, it appears that Spot the Boston Robotics dog is not controlled by AI, but by living humans.

          “Cylons in Nylons” could be remotely controlled by humans, perhaps multiple robots being controlled by one human with AI handling some mundane tasks.

          1. Completely wide open door for pink-haired humans to participate in Kill-tech without actual physical involvement.

      3. That’s exactly what I see when I drive around. Motivated people in motion….

Comments are closed.