A Short Preview (Login to Access the Full Interview):

Theme: The Grand Pretense

Interview: 2nd Quarter 2023 Wrap Up: Equity Overview & Rambus Chartology with Tim Caban

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


75 Comments

  1. Since I fired my cable TV company 5 years ago for poor customer service, and I have analog tube-type TVs at home since flat screen TVs in stores and hotels make me dizzy, I cannot receive broadcast digital signals at home without a converter box, which I have but never hooked up.  I borrow DVDs from my local library instead and purchase VHS tapes and DVDs from local estate sales. 

    “The Blacklist” TV series was recommended to me.  Season 2, Episodes 21 “Karakurt” and 22 “Tom Connolly” finish out the season, which aired in May 2015.  In it, the characters talk about “The Cabal”, or as Dr. Joseph P. Farrell likes to call them, “Mr. Globalloni”, a shadow gov’t.  They have their minions throughout the DOJ, AG, FBI, and Congress that are in positions to threaten and manipulate the good ethical people underneath them with loss of job and income, prison with no trial, disappear into oblivion, or injury to self or family.  In addition, there is a specialized virus in these episodes that was developed in a clandestine laboratory.  Oh, my!  ?  And guess what they discuss will happen if it gets released?  A lockdown!  Cool!  ?.  Déjà vu! ?  Or “déjà vu all over again” as one sportscaster likes to say.  This virus targets certain DNA types.  It’s a roto-virus rather than a corona-virus, spiral rather than crown, but it still is a virus.  And 2 RNAs make a DNA.  And since 5 to 8 years later we are talking about mRNA (modified RNA) technology and behind the scenes some sort of unelected government, I think these episodes are rather poignant today.  Is this “art imitating life”, or is it now “life imitating art”?  It begs the question:  “Which came first? The chicken or the egg?”  Was the virus planned or was it a reaction to nature?

  2. Starting at time 1.24.00 Catherine talks about the sound money angle.
    It’s a great introduction and I am looking forward to hearing more about this.

    Here’s the text I transcribed:
    What could lead to extreme deflation in the US is the sound money solution, that we’re going to solve the dollar problem not by extinguishing the debt-based currency but by attaching it to a gold or silver standard or a Bitcoin standard. When you take a tiny market – gold, silver, and Bitcoin are tiny markets – and you basically take a market that is scores of multiples greater and you attach them, Wham. The paper bubble stops, and there’s a nose-dive for the real assets. And it’s at that moment that the Fed is pumping out tons of money to their pals which means they can grab all the real assets and the rest of us will be shut out of the game of musical chairs.
    When the US was gold based that was used to engineer the depression of 1929 simply by shifting gold in large quantities overseas and thus viserated the US monetary base and it contracted the money supply and it caused extremely severe deflation.
    It back to this thing that I inject an enormous amount of money to my pals and I use these various health-care or climate change or other scenarios to shut down my enemies, so I can do it with a shut-down or a lock-down but I can also do it with playing the sound money game.
    We must therefore be careful and not talk about these policies in terms of ‘what?’. Rather we have to talk about these policies in terms of ‘who?’. Who is the winner and who is the loser? Who is advantaged and who is harmed. And you’ll see all sorts of monetary reformists talking about these things in terms of ‘what’ stuff without talking about who going to win, because this is a game of players, and some players are being advantaged and some players are being disadvantaged. So you always have to talk first and foremost ‘who?’. Who controls? Who decides? Who gets the cash? Who gets shut down? Who, who who?

    1. Probably the W.H.O. ?
      (Sorry, I couldn’t resist the pun.)
      On a more serious note I doubt we will ever know who benefits. Oh, we might can guess some higher-ups in publicly traded companies, but not all are listed. And large investors are not named unless they own 11% or more of the stock or bonds. They can own 4.6% of the company and be quiet and hidden from public view, yet still receive a significant portion of the proceeds.

  3. Regarding Catherine’s comment on Bitcoin going “green”: I live at the headwaters to the Columbia River in eastern British Columbia, Canada. There is a small town just south of me called Canal Flats that has a small ex mining and forestry population. A few years ago a Bitcoin mining operation moved in, and is entirely fuelled by hydroelectricity, which was the point of moving there. I am seeing this happen in a few other places in B.C., as most of our electrical grid, if not all of it, is hydro. Last year the company spent $1M CDN on electricity to mine $4M in Bitcoin…

    1. Yup. This is what I am told big tech did in Iceland. They pump and dumped the place and then picked up the geothermal energy.

  5. Thanks for touching on Africa this week. Lots going on there that the US has a hand in. Ugly.

  6. Wondering if anyone can post a book or reference for John Titus’ comment that moving the U.S. gold overseas triggered the Great Depression? I’d never heard of that, only the official reality of a stock market crash. Thanks!

  7. Hi Catherine, and John, if you think the power of banks might be a problem, think about the plans the UK seems to have in place to turn off electricity. One consumer reports her supplier advising her that her “Alpha” is ‘J’, and assures her that under exceptional conditions her electricity may be switched off for three hours, because that will be ‘fair’.
    And the UK Government blames ‘Russia’

Comments are closed.