A Short Preview:

Theme: A Tired Playbook Is a Dangerous Playbook

Ask Catherine will be posted on Friday here.

Interview: 3rd Quarter 2023 Wrap Up: News Trends & Stories, Part I with Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


134 Comments

  1. Re jabs and deaths, I put this up in substack in May :
    https://richarda697.substack.com/p/bioweapon_modelling_part_1

    I have not published my latest, but you can get an idea of where I’m going by doing this:
    Go into Our World in Data and select Health, Covid-19 and the USA
    Pick any day in the first half of 2021 after March 12.
    Note the 7-day average Jabs and divide by 50.
    Compare to the number of cases …….

  2. Posting this in two places here on Solari

    The electronic medical records vendor is Epic systems. Here’s something else I’m noticing. Young woman, teen, gets some sort of drug or alcohol treatment. Reports to the treatment team that her own mother abuses alcohol. The treatment team enters this information about the mother and alcoholism into the electronic medical records database. Alcoholism become a diagnosis of the mother’s, based upon the teen saying it’s so, while the teen in treatment for drug withdrawal. 5 years later that former teenager has a baby of her own. The birth is documented in the Epic systems. Epic scoops data from the mother’s records, including the diagnosis (made by the daughter) that the grandmother is an alcoholic, and attached it all to the baby’s records. The grandmother’s diagnosis of alcoholism is now attached to the grandbaby’s family history records. Forever. No qualified diagnostician has ever actually observed the grandmother to be an alcoholic and she is likely completely unaware that this diagnosis, made by people who’ve never met her, has been attached to all of her family’s medical records. Were grandmother to try to recover this information about herself from her grandchildren’s records, and have this removed, she’d likely be barred from doing so with HIPAA cited. This is really happening. A lot.

  3. Hey Catherine, I’m at a loss to understand why you think Obummer is still running the usg. I mean, the guy was the presidential champion for hours off and time spent on the golf course. He’s an empty suit just like many others before and since. W, especially, comes to mind. Your idea seems untenable. Isn’t it more likely they knew that an alzheimers/dementia patient would make a pliable front man?

    1. He is not an important decision making – assume just a switch center helping to managing the process.

        1. Sorry, I don’t buy any of this. Obummer is too busy with his golf game and gay lovers. More likely Rice is the conduit for a neocon committee, if she’s anything at all. Many posit that who’s running the show (emphasis on that word) is not anyone whose name we know. That sounds more like it.

  4. Does anyone have the video link the subscriber made about Maui HI with the GiS software vs the specific lots that look like a burnt offering CAF has talked about in the last week?

  5. Catherine and John, fantastic show as ever.

    Thought the discussion about Hamilton was very interesting. I’m originally from England and lived there for twenty-eight years. Even though the Bank of England was “nationalized” in 1946, I’m not aware of any evidence that it is in any way, publicly owned. As far as I can tell, there’s no difference between the basic operation of the BoE, the Fed, or any other central bank.

    The British public remains indebted to the BoE, and is on the hook to repay the national debt, which currently stands at some £2.5t. The British public receives none of the benefits of ownership of this institution.

    The actual owners of the BoE, like almost all central banks, are a closely guarded secret. I believe the reigning monarch owns a percentage (3%), but who owns the rest? I don’t see how it’s the British people.

    If anyone knows the answer, I’d love to hear it.

    1. if fraud could be proven, or intent to deceive, would the debt still have to be repaid?

      1. As in an “odious” debt? Who knows. As Catherine and John point out every week, fraud is constantly being committed by our political leadership.

        I would argue that the entire premise of the current central banking system IS fraudulent. Privately owned institutions, charging interest on money created out of thin air. And almost nobody (outside the likes of Solari subscribers) has any idea about it.

        So, so, wrong.

  6. 1:29:00 the common item for the hotspots is “care for the elderly”; i.e., mass murder in old people homes and nursing homes.

  7. and all those countries Rancourt mentioned in the end had nursing home scandals at that time.

Comments are closed.