[Originally published on Feb 2, 2009]
For our entire lives, most of us have depended on highly centralized systems. Our food comes from a thousand or more miles away. Our savings is shipped into distant financial centers and invested by strangers in enterprises run by strangers. We watch highly scripted news that serves the same spin no matter how many channels we try. We bank at impersonal global banks with criminal records that would make a felon blush and have no idea where our money goes, just that the government guarantees that we will get it back.
Within this centralized system, diversification means having your financial assets deposited into a “one-stop-shop” brokerage account invested in securities representing different global industries, the idea being when one industry is doing poorly, another “countercyclical” industry would be doing well.
But suddenly, we find that we may not be able to trust these centralized systems. Suddenly, traditional portfolio theory no longer addresses our anxiety. This is because we need to shift from diversification within a centralized system to real diversification in a decentralized, possibly “out of control” world.
If you study the investment patterns of families and wealth that has survived through the generations, including through periods of lawlessness and warfare, you come to understand that for those who want to thrive in all economic and political scenarios, diversification has had a far deeper meaning than what is commonly understood in the financial markets today. For the astute strategist, it means not putting all your eggs in one basket in every important aspect of your life. Given what is happening in our world and economy, it’s time to revisit the deeper meaning of diversification.
Diversification means that our assets are invested such that an economic, political, or natural event — particularly a catastrophic event — cannot wipe us out. So, for example, we don’t invest all of our savings in a single financial institution or fund. Investors who lost their life savings in the Madoff scandal were not practicing even the most basic form of financial diversification.
Diversification also means having multiple types of assets and custodians in multiple places. Custodians (i.e., those who hold our assets for us) might be brokerage firms, banks, depositories or our own safe.
Diversification by place means locating our assets in states or countries subject to different legal and political risks. It means denominating our assets in currencies of multiple countries. It means selecting assets subject to different risks of loss due to climate change, weather conditions, social conditions and other uniquely local vicissitudes. Local investment is a great idea, but the people who lived through Katrina can tell you why having all of your eggs in one local basket may not be the best idea.
Diversification means that we don’t have all of our savings in just one type of asset. So we don’t invest in securities only — we also invest in tangibles. If possible, we buy a house without debt, or with debt that can be serviced by one family member’s income, or invest in our home to lower energy and food costs permanently. We also maintain a sufficient inventory of household goods. And it’s a good idea to invest in disaster preparedness if we live in an area that experiences earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, or tornadoes or is prone to power outages.
Having all your money in one currency or one country is pretty risky – a risk many in the US tend to take. Ask your Jewish friends whose parents got out of Germany in time because they had gold coins or family and assets abroad. Gold coins may hold their value if the dollar collapses, but they can also disappear in a burglary or if you forget where you put them. Digital gold may be a great thing, but if the Internet is not reliable where you are, cold cash may be a good thing. Or if your cash is worthless, a stockpile of food, vitamins and liquor can be priceless. However, food, vitamins and liquor are only good when you are bartering with someone who wants them or is close by. Which takes us back to gold coins or digital gold or some other currencies. So you see, there is no magic bullet – just diversification.
Diversification of life risks is an integral part of all matters related to financial capital. Living things are the source of all wealth. That includes you and me.
Diversification means that we invest in our physical and mental well-being. We invest our time in understanding the toxic chemicals, drugs and other influences that increasingly contribute to poor health and cause us to need so much more funding for more drugs and medical treatments to cure what ails us. One of the greatest – and growing — threats to our financial health is physical illness. The notion that corporate stock investments will create security while one saves money eating unhealthy food is contradictory to the principles of building real wealth.
Diversification means that we invest not just in our own human capital but also in the human capital of other members of our family and those around us. In this way, we are not betting on financial assets alone to see us through. We are investing in each other because it is family, friends and communities that help see us through. An active network of mutually-supportive friends and colleagues is important. For those with sufficient capital and skills, financing the farmers and companies we depend on for our daily bread may not provide much of a return — it may, however, ensure that we have healthy, safe food.
Diversification also applies to the work we do. For most people, our labor is our most important source of financial assets. Skill diversity can mean, for example, that you have a number of skills. If one skill goes out of favor, another will give you the ability to be economically useful. If you have a business that fails, you have the ability to start a new business because you have the experience and diversity of skills to make a business run.
The ability to generate income through your own business or practice is invaluable, particularly when the economic environment makes “W-2” employment more difficult to find. If you are an employee and your company closes, if you have taken care to broaden your skill base, your skills can be valuable commodities for other, different types of employers or employers in other industries or places less affected by a downturn. Better yet, you know how to do many things for yourself, thus offsetting lost income with lower expenses. Look at those who are successful in the current environment: what most of them share is a commitment to life-long learning that translates into a multitude of personal and professional skills.
Diversification is not always easy to achieve. The more resources we have, the easier it is to diversify. The fewer resources we have, the more our diversification focuses on building our human capital and community. Interestingly enough, many of the best opportunities before us are those that can happen when people who have a lot of money and people who don’t have money but have a lot of skills become allies in building greater diversification together. Isolation shrinks our options. Opportunities expand as we organize and collaborate effectively. Hence, it is critical to not assume financial capital can provide sufficient diversification alone and remain isolated from our neighbors and family.
One of my goals for the Solari Report is to explore options we have to strengthen and diversify our human and financial capital and to introduce you to leaders who are taking action to help us do so. This week, I will be reviewing recent financial events and discussing indications that more and more people are concerned about a financial coup d’etat.
Related Reading:
CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HIT MAN is a fascinating story — and one that RINGS TRUE —- I tend to lump all COURAGOUS WHISTLEBLOWERS —- and DEFECTORS FROM THE ” SYSTEM ” and LOVERS OF TRUTH AND HATERS OF LIES AND DECEPTION as simply ” TRUTHSEEKERS ” —- and one of the problems we face is identifying the clever liars around us —- among the techniques I use are — THE WORDS THAT COME OUT OF PEOPLES MOUTHES —- and just as importantly — THE WORDS THAT DONT —- and evaluating their eyes —- becase the ” EYES TRULY ARE THE WINDOWS OF THE SOUL ” and catherne — you can be glad you declined that opportunity ( when you were serving in government ) of meeting what I recall was described as a HYBRID REPTILLIAN — I had a personal encounter with one — and they posses STRONG PYSCHIC POWERS that we dont —- and the only protection from them is STRONG SPIRITUAL ARMOUR —- but that story gets into UFOs and ALIEN ABDUCTIONS and GENETIC EXPERIMENTS on humans — etc ————- PEACE KEN
Catherine,
Re: The voracity of Naomi Klein as referenced herein
First, allow me to thank you for your efforts to provide intelligent and honest information to the public in your chosen fields of interest. I have followed and enjoyed, admittedly at a distance, your writing via the “Scoop” mailing list for several years. Upon coming across your language, “Financial Coup d’Etat”, today, I was finally motivated to sign up for your news letter directly; when I read the comment above, and your reply, regarding one of the reviews, on Amazon.com, of Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine”. Aside from your commenter’s derisive characterization of Ms. Klein as a “privileged white woman from Canada”, I was curious to read the review, one of over 300 submitted by Amazon members, written by one Mariano Muruzabal. This reading caused me to reply thusly:
“At first glance this rant against the work of Naomi Klein, cloaked in the pretense of defending the economic woes of Argentina, appears to be sincere and authoritative. However, calling Naomi Klein a liar, Evo Morales a Nazi, and attributing the economic woes of greater South and Central America to the failed efforts of communist militants, smacks of a particularly repugnant form of psuedo-intellectual revisionism typical of the advocates of economic colonialism.
As is typical of such propagandists, both of Mariano Muruzabal’s comments on the Amazon blog are replete with just enough credible information and references to lend the appearance of credibility to the intended revisionist diatribe.
Why, one might ask, is there no mention of the catastrophic effects on Argentina’s economy that resulted from the privatization of the public infrastructure by the IMF and the foreign corporate international interests?
I concur that a careful reading of Mauricio Rojas is informative, but only if the reader understands his position and loyalties in Chile at the time. One might also consider “Confessions of an Economic Hit Man” by John Perkins an informative work by a person intimately involved in the subject.
As an anthropologist who has lived and travelled all over South and Central America over the past 50 years, I am very pleased to see so many of these proud countries casting off the yoke of colonialism and forming their own individualized versions of democracy. For anyone to portend that these new democratically elected governments are communist or socialist dictatorships following the Cuban model is a highly suspect claim at best.”
I look forward to participating in future discussions, and hope these thoughts are not regarded as a serious digression from the instant topic, “Rethinking Diversification.”
ta
Usury — neither a borrower nor a lender be else thou kannst be false to any man.
“The debtor is servant to the lender.” “Be the head and not the tail.”
Any society permitting debt will eventually follow corrupt paths. It is inevitable.
If the average home price is $150,000 and a modest rate of interest is charged, most people if they do not refi and if they pay off their loan, really pay $450,000 for their house.
I recommend smaller communities of like raced and like-minded people who form their own schools that don’t promote racial hatred of one race against another funded by the tax dollars of the local residents.
I recommend communities with far less regulation work together contributing skills — the plumber helping his neighbor, the doctor and teacher helping, the crafts and tradesmen taking pride again in their local work, the grower of food first thinking of the immediate homogeneous grouping.
By getting together to build the homes of one another, the cost of materials would make the $150,000 home perhaps a third that amount at most. Saving and paying cash in a year or two would reduce the mortgage slavery. Ability to pay would also shift as would the sense of building a future, loving this earth, and working together with people one wants to see have lives even better than ones own. In cooperation without competition, this is possible in like communities where scholarship is prized and independent thinking creates innovative, even relatively permanent solutions to many problems.
This seems like a dream as one surveys the complex jungle we have built around ourselves. It is possible if people wish for it and realize the distractions and false debates are someone else’s lingo and value system.
There are several innovative home builders that groups could look at. The alternative energies, passive solar, and other free energies that have been with us before these many rules and regulations go unused … only and mostly … because of greed of a few.
I do not look at either capitalism nor communism as a solution.
I also believe we are in a gigantic engineered love fest while looking away as our freedoms have been attacked and our good government with many products produced here locally plundered. All in the name of progress or whatever buzz word is fed us, the sheeple stampede … as the puppet masters intend (have to keep them doing something as well as working and consuming).
Cheers! May we build the world we wish to live in and find the happiness of closer groups instead of neighborhoods where few talk with their neighbors for years. Even 50 years ago, we had a better world in terms of society.
I AM SORRY — but once again the MASTER covered it when HE said — ” THE WORLD WILL NOT CHANGE UNTIL MENS HEARTS CHANGE ” — and so — that is the question I have persued the past 25 years —– WHY HAS CHRISTIANITY FAILED TO CHANGE MENS HEARTS SUFICIENTLY TO HAVE CHANGED THE WORLD ? and the answer is that JESUS gave us the solution — HE called it the NARROW PATH — and HE gave us the instructions on how to find it —– and thru the grace of GOD I have —- but try and find a CHURCH that SPECIFICALY TEACHES ITS MEMBERS HOW TO DO THAT and I have almost given up on trying to get any pastors or priests to listen — THEIR YEARS IN THE SEMINARY PROVES THEY ARE THE ” EXPERTS ” and therefore it would be IMPOSSIBLE for amere student of ALL THAT JESUS TAUGHT to know something they dont —- PRIDE — PRIDE — PRIDE —– but of course that is what also drives all those members of those GOOD OLE BOYS CLUBS also —- to the point that they love PLAYING GOD WITH THE REST OF US —- no wonder the CREATOR gets DISGUSTED WITH US — and WIPES THE SLATE CLEAN every so many million years with a POLE SHIFT — where the invisible axis about which the earth rotates —- shifts to a new location causing enormous changes in the earths crust and wiping out most of its population — and a group of 150 scientists of all the various disciplines (www.thehorizonproject.com ) believe that such a shift is begining to occur — now that possibilty is truly SOBERING PEACE KEN
Maybe it would not be a bad idea if someone would elaborate on your history – there was a period in American history where there was no inflation – how it was done, what they did, how it can be done again; or post some usefull links on that subject – best practices examples …
Kind regards.
Thanks, Byron.
I agree with the poster that the problems go back a long way — as does the exploitation. Klein’s work is not perfect — but it does do an excellent job of nailing the fundamental model what we are watching world wide — and the complicity of foundations and academics. I really appreciate seeing this link and your post.
When we come back to the red button story, we come back to the fact that we are all complicit and the model is centuries old.
Catherine
Catherine,
I love your blog and follow it closely. Someday soon I will join the weekly conference call. I really appreciate this introduction to a new way of thinking about deversification. I am forwarding the link to all my friends/family.
But with regards to your use of “The Take” as an example of economic collapse caused by globalists, please take a look at this review of Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine” I found at amazon.com. http://www.amazon.com/review/R1XEHFOIY3K1XN/ref=cm_cr_pr_cmt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&ASIN=0805079831&nodeID=#wasThisHelpful
In it, an Argentinian categorically denies Klein’s view of the economic crisis and claims Klein’s view is often referred to in Argentina as “the Official Lie”. She goes on to correct many of Klein’s alleged errors and, in reponse to a query, provides references to three books (only two of which have been translated into english) that tell a much different story. I haven’t read any of these and am no expert on Argentinian politics/economics. But when a native reacts so strongly to the history of her country written by a priveleged white woman from Canada, it gives me pause.
Byron