Theme:

Tracking the Going Direct Reset with John Titus – 2 Weeks to Flatten the Curve, Right?


Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

39 Comments

  1. Hi

    Could you expand on the comments you and John made about the plunge protection team and the intersection of covert and overt bank/fed reserve / market operations.

    I don’t know much but it sounds intriguing.

    thank you

  2. I am new here to Solari Report and just getting my feet wet. There is not much shallow water to learn in so I find myself with many questions. Firstly, have you ever considered making some kind of chart of the financial system organizations in a hierarchial sort of layout both private and public? Without acronyms?! FSB/BIS/SWIFT/Fed/Treasury/SEC and then perhaps some kind of diagram of the revolving door between them? This would help us as we follow along on the Central Bank Takeover of Govt. Secondly, do you have a list of names of people we should be wanting to get into positions on the public/political/Treasury side who have shown an understanding of fiscal vs monetary policy and how to protect our nations from this Central Bank takeover? Thank you.

    1. Great suggestions May. For names and definitions, I have traditionally used Wikipedia. They are good for them. When we have made list of names and definitions they have not gotten much usage, so we have just kept recommending Investopedia and Wikipedia. I am working on something for the 1st Quarter Wrap Up on ideas to hold governments accountable on tax flows. I strongly suggest you start with Coming Clean https://home.solari.com/coming-clean/ and Unpacking Your Local Financial Ecosystem and the related links and resources https://library.solari.com/unpacking-your-financial-ecosystem/

  3. Everybody must understand that this “Plandemic” was invented and entertained for the big reset to happen along with the on-time ago planned depopulation.
    Thus, it would be suitable that all intelligent people propose viable solutions for humanity to come out of this imprisonment. Repeating, again and again, the same known stories, PCR test, not suitable for the virus testing, lockdown does not work, and social distancing are only to avoid the gathering of people, destroying systematically small and medium businesses. I found maybe 5-10 people who came with solutions and risks their lives. Actually, Not comply is the tile of all these solutions and implicates citizens’ existing constitutional rights to be known and used to defend themselves. For ex. in this interview would be better to train people to think and LIVE W/O BANKS. I hope that Catherine Austin would start to educate and help people go out of the existing financial system. Thanks

  4. Hi Catherine, I’ve been thinking of adding a comment on how I think about Bitcoin:
    Ireland had a rebellion, a rising, in 1916. A few years later Michael Collins as part of a faction of the Provisional Government went to see a Banker about a loan. Before sitting down to begin negotiations, allegedly he took out a .45 automatic and placed it on the table.
    I think of Bitcoin and a modern equivalent to that .45 automatic.
    If I’m wrong, I figure we are all screwed.

    1. Hi Catherine,

      The more I am learning about Bitcoin, the more I agree with Richard’s statement here. I found this video to be useful. “Everything You Need to Know About Bitcoin in 2021 | Andreas Antonopoulos” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUOpKfCuV_E

      I would love if you can bring in some Bitcoin folks (not other cryptocurrencies) for a conversation on Solari.

      1. I’ve often thought that “winning an arguement” is an oxymoron, since it is the loser that is likely to gain in the exchange.
        I can’t really comment much about bitcoin in 2021, except that it is very different from, say, 2011.
        As for the alternatives, I have read that between 1934 and 1971 (IIRC) it was illegal to own gold in the USA. As for fiat currency, the USA seems to claim jurisdiction wherever the US$ goes.
        I see that as a question of balancing risks and rewards.

  5. Hi Catherine!

    Just found your resources after watching your interview on Planet Lockdown.

    I have been interested in your opinion regarding what role you see Bitcoin playing in the short and long term, but can’t find any commentary from you since things were pumping back in 2017. Am I missing more recent content? If you haven’t covered this recently, would you be willing to share your opinion? A couple specific questions I’d love to hear from you on:

    1. Do you consider BTC to be too high of a risk asset for gaining wealth in the short term? long term?

    2. Would you consider holding BTC to be “playing into the hands” of those who want to centralize digital currency?

    3. What’s your prediction on BTC getting regulated?

    4. If you had to guess, what price do you see BTC going to short and long term?

    Many thanks for what you’re doing!

  6. Dear Catherine

    It is clear to me that under contract law (invitatio ad oferta) the merchant is within his rights to refuse to accept cash (notes or coins) for a purchase but what is the situation in terms of paying a debt, for example in the case of a utility bill or a tax arrears?

    Regarding the issue of legal tender laws, you might be interested to know about the case of the journalist Norbert Haering in Germany where everyone who has a television set or radio is obliged to pay a license fee to pay for the public stations, regardless of whether or not one listens or views any of the public stations. This license fee is taken by the GEZ by direct debit however Haering wanted to pay his fee in cash in euros, the only legal tender in the country. Haering’s case went to the German Constiutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht). Even though by law the GEZ must accept cash, Haering’s case wound up going to the European Court (Gerichtshof der Europaeischen Union) in Luxembourg which decided on this case on the 21st January as follows:

    “A Euro-area Member State may require its administration to accept cash payments, but it may also refuse this payment facility on grounds of public interest. Such a restriction may be justified, in particular, if cash payment may lead to unreasonable costs for the administration because of the very large number of payment obligations.”.

Comments are closed.