“If you’re yelling you’re the one who’s lost control of the conversation.” ~Taylor Swift
[Originally published on September 11, 2018]
By Catherine Austin Fitts
For many years I worked with a passion to create a financial model that would align our accounting, information, and government financial systems with places. My goal was to create a win-win relationship system-wide between people and living things and the financial system. We could generate immense capital gains and wealth from healing and nurturing the environment. Global citizens could take responsibility to implement real change through the allocation of their time and resources.
I say this to emphasize how important I believe a healthy environment is for all life – including yours and mine.
Our environmental problems are symptoms of an invisible governance system, which has a different map of reality than we do and appears to have different goals than ours. It has purposely engineered our accounting and information systems to ensure central control. If we are to change how we manage and interact with our environment, then first we must illuminate and evolve our governance system, and with it our accounting, information, and financial systems.
Consequently, I am often challenged trying to have an intelligent conversation with people passionate about the environment who are in a state of panic about this or that environmental issue or problem. What I often hear is that they are eager to generate more cost for people and families and more wealth and power of the invisible governance system. This, they feel, is not a problem since everything is such an emergency.
For me to have an intelligent conversation about the environment, I must be able to integrate the following factors:
-
1. Space:
– What is happening in space and how does space weather – including the sun and other planets in our galaxy – relate to our environment on earth?
2. Environmental changes throughout history:
– What are the cycles historically on Planet Earth—not just over the last 100 years, but over the last 100,000 years or more?
3. Deterioration in the electromagnetic field:
– What is happening in the planet’s electromagnetic field?
4. Geophysical condition of the earth:
– What is the geophysical condition of the earth?
– What risks does that pose to human and other living things?
5. Air:
– What is the oxygen content in our atmosphere?
– Why is it declining?
6. Governance structure:
– Governance: Who is really in charge? What are the facts of the UFO phenomenon? Who has the most powerful weaponry and military presence? Is there a “breakaway civilization”?
– Budgets: There is a great deal of money disappearing from bailouts, quantitative easing (QE), and $21 trillion missing from the U.S. government. The governments of the world are spending $2-trillion-plus a year on military budgets. Where is all this money going?
– Energy: Breakthrough energy has been suppressed for at least 100 years, and possibly for thousands of years. Why? Our dependency on fossil fuel and legacy energy technology is enforced top down. Will we be able to implement low-cost energy through renewables and fusion technologies?
– Mind control: How do we protect our minds and maps of reality from mind control so we can have an intelligent conversation about governance and the environment?
– Smart grid: "Smart technology" is often proposed as a solution. However, this technology allows AI to access every aspect of our life, delivers more corporate control, and facilitates invasive mind control. Is more central control really a solution or is it the problem?
– Debt: Who owns our debt? Are there invisible secret agreements with creditors that function as "treaty agreements"?
– Fiat currency: Fiat currency is one of the leading causes of environmental damage. At the same time, many environmentalists are financially dependent on the subsidies financed with it. Why the "multiple personality disorder"?
7. Man-made impacts:
– Space fence: Why are we building a space fence by ionizing the atmosphere?
– Nuclear testing: What has the impact been on the atmosphere, including testing in the upper atmosphere?
– Nuclear accidents: What has the impact been of existing accidents such as Chernobyl and Fukushima? What are the risks of future accidents and challenges of dealing with nuclear waste?
– Global spraying: Why are we dumping tons of heavy metals and man-made nanoparticles into the atmosphere?
– HAARP: What is HAARP and how is it being used?
– Weather warfare: Are some natural disasters a result of weather warfare? What about extreme climate events? Is our weather being manipulated for greater control and profit or to make new territories accessible? Who has this technology?
– Energy: What is the environmental impact of the political requirement to use fossil fuels or nuclear energy? How will this be impacted by Asia's convergence with G7 incomes?
– Chemicals: There have been 150,000 new chemicals introduced into the environment in the last century. What effect does that have on climate?
8. Manipulation:
– Why do environmentalists so often promote greater governmental and central controls?
– Why do environmental groups so often continue to support the financial interests most associated with central government control?
– Why do environmentalists so often insist that our situation is far too dire for the luxury of integrated analysis that includes the issues listed in these questions?
– Why do people passionate about climate change try to bully me rather than engage in a discussion about the issues listed in these questions?
9. Invisible weaponry and technology:
– What is the state of our invisible weaponry and technology, and how does it relate to our weather, climate, and natural disasters?
– What are CERN and the other colliders, and how do they impact our magnetic core and natural and living systems?
I am happy to discuss the environment, including the climate, from a vantage point of reality. However, if you censor aspects of reality or uncertainty, I can’t have an intelligent conversation with you about it.
The next time the bully thing happens – or I meet with the implication that I am uncaring or unfeeling because of a need for an integrated analysis – I can just send the person to this post. While I am hoping to have intelligent conversations about the environment with one and all, the time has come for me to stack functions and bow out with a link.
Related Reading
A simply superb comment!
What I also often miss in conversations with passionate environmentalists who — I do believe — are genuine nature-loving people, is even a small inkling of the powerful intelligence of ‘nature’ and its/her ability to problem-solve on her own. In their views, nature can only be ‘preserved’ or will die, it does not seem to be able to adapt, morphe and transform into a new victory — just as we do in our lives when we are tested and go through crises. And according to them, only WE can save the environment, a view that unconsciously separates us from HER. While in reality we are mutually embedded.
So the possibility of the intelligence or even consciousness of nature should be taken into account. There is so much proof for it.
What is happening in the Noosphere, not just the Biosphere? How does the sphere of consciousness (Vernadsky’s ‘Noosphere’) contribute to and affect the living sphere? Do our thoughts, conversations, intentions, emotions have impact on life?
And, is our Noos/Mind the only one contributing to this sphere of consciousness, or does it continue outward…?
Excellent! I always learn from you, Ulrike! This reminds me of the wise person who upon hearing a strident description of the dimininishment of sun spots and the dire consequences, said, “Perhaps we should all arise every morning and thank the sun for its many blessings.”
Yes, we have to “shun” (as Catherine says) the centralizers and all their works and “front men” and get back in tune ourselves.
A simply superb comment!
What I also often miss in conversations with passionate environmentalists who — I do believe — are genuine nature-loving people, is even a small inkling of the powerful intelligence of ‘nature’ and its/her ability to problem-solve on her own. In their views, nature can only be ‘preserved’ or will die, it does not seem to be able to adapt, morphe and transform into a new victory — just as we do in our lives when we are tested and go through crises. And according to them, only WE can save the environment, a view that unconsciously separates us from HER. While in reality we are mutually embedded.
So the possibility of the intelligence or even consciousness of nature should be taken into account. There is so much proof for it.
What is happening in the Noosphere, not just the Biosphere? How does the sphere of consciousness (Vernadsky’s ‘Noosphere’) contribute to and affect the living sphere? Do our thoughts, conversations, intentions, emotions have impact on life?
And, is our Noos/Mind the only one contributing to this sphere of consciousness, or does it continue outward…?
Excellent! I always learn from you, Ulrike! This reminds me of the wise person who upon hearing a strident description of the dimininishment of sun spots and the dire consequences, said, “Perhaps we should all arise every morning and thank the sun for its many blessings.”
Yes, we have to “shun” (as Catherine says) the centralizers and all their works and “front men” and get back in tune ourselves.
Catherine, As an environment engineer, I say BRAVO. The environmental challenges facing us are multi-faceted and complex, and require integrated solutions. Instead in my field, folks often take a stance on one side of the isle or the other, with a firm belief that “My truth is righter than your truth”, which is ridiculous. I respect your inclusive list and thank you for it. I may use it.
Stacy
Thanks, Stacy. I appreciate that given I know only the money side and what I read and see and you have a much more profound knowledge. I hope you add to it. As Daniel has shown, there’s more! The world needs a really thorough framework – at least we start with one that defines the uncertainty.
Catherine, As an environment engineer, I say BRAVO. The environmental challenges facing us are multi-faceted and complex, and require integrated solutions. Instead in my field, folks often take a stance on one side of the isle or the other, with a firm belief that “My truth is righter than your truth”, which is ridiculous. I respect your inclusive list and thank you for it. I may use it.
Stacy
Thanks, Stacy. I appreciate that given I know only the money side and what I read and see and you have a much more profound knowledge. I hope you add to it. As Daniel has shown, there’s more! The world needs a really thorough framework – at least we start with one that defines the uncertainty.
To manmade impacts I would add the damage being done to the upper atmosphere by
rocket launchers into space. You posted an article on this a few months ago which stated the increase in space shots has the potential to destroy the upper atmosphere which protects us from space radiation.
Daniel. Great add. THANKS!
To manmade impacts I would add the damage being done to the upper atmosphere by
rocket launchers into space. You posted an article on this a few months ago which stated the increase in space shots has the potential to destroy the upper atmosphere which protects us from space radiation.
Daniel. Great add. THANKS!
I recently heard you wondering about how it is that ‘global warming’ is apparently affecting sea levels to the extent that the U.S. navy is in a gazillion-dollar tizzy to get all its ports relocated so they won’t be submerged by ‘rising seas’. I heard about this, just as you did, from Colonel Wilkerson; and it has puzzled me, as well, since I think we two are in the same camp of believing that ‘anthropomorphic climate change’ as it is meant to be understood is a scam; yet this is the apparent rationale given to explain the need to relocate naval bases. Awhile back I did hear one explanation — that ocean warming (therefore sea-level rising) is much more affected by underwater volcanic activity than by surface temperatures. However, that didn’t seem altogether satisfactory, not to mention that I’ve also read on multiple occasions that measured sea levels are moving up at a tiny pace.
Yesterday, I got what seems like a much better answer to this conundrum in a new Kerry Cassidy interview with Deborah Tavares concerning Hurricane Florence. What I understood Tavares to say is that both the U.S. and Russia have now mastered the art of causing storm surges if they choose. Apparently, there is a move afoot, as part of U.N. Agenda 21, for the U.S. government to weaponize weather so as to destroy coasts and severely curtail human habitation along them (part of ‘wilding’) — Hurricane Florence being a possible case in point. I guess if our government does it to us, that’s not a ‘national security issue’, but if the Russians are able to do the same thing, then the navy would obviously see itself in danger, given that we’re so determined to turn Russia into a genuine enemy. And that would explain the ‘need’ to relocate naval installations. I don’t know if Tavares is right, but her explanation is a perfect fit, and she strikes me as a careful, intelligent researcher, very clued in. She lives in northern California and is on top of the ‘thermal gentrification’ (what a classic CAF phrase!) going on there. Website: StopTheCrime.net. Interview: Kerry Cassidy YouTube channel (February 12, parts 1 and 2).
Ginny, I suspect we are in the midst of a high-tech global war and I do think that weaponized weather is part of it, see comments below. There are also reports that the entire solar system is experiencing a rise in vulcanism, perhaps due to natural forces. Anthropogenic climate change represents the effects of a fairly weakly-elaborated mechanism, but one that has passionate promoters and believers. In my opinion, you are on the right track.
Possible explanations for a weaponized Florence – in order of priority
1. Secret operations, including land/naval shipments from West Africa (US African command) aka the Gold Coast
2. Negotiations/operations related to November elections
3. Distraction from legal and legislative changes underway
4. Additions to GNP – construction, etc.
5. Expect gentrification on the coastal areas.
6. Other (these operations always stack functions.)