[Originally published on September 11, 2018]
“If you’re yelling you’re the one who’s lost control of the conversation.”
~Taylor Swift
By Catherine Austin Fitts
For many years I worked with a passion to create a financial model that would align our accounting, information, and government financial systems with places. My goal was to create a win-win relationship system-wide between people and living things and the financial system. We could generate immense capital gains and wealth from healing and nurturing the environment. Global citizens could take responsibility to implement real change through the allocation of their time and resources.
I say this to emphasize how important I believe a healthy environment is for all life – including yours and mine.
Our environmental problems are symptoms of an invisible governance system, which has a different map of reality than we do and appears to have different goals than ours. It has purposely engineered our accounting and information systems to ensure central control. If we are to change how we manage and interact with our environment, then first we must illuminate and evolve our governance system, and with it our accounting, information, and financial systems.
Consequently, I am often challenged trying to have an intelligent conversation with people passionate about the environment who are in a state of panic about this or that environmental issue or problem. What I often hear is that they are eager to generate more cost for people and families and more wealth and power of the invisible governance system. This, they feel, is not a problem since everything is such an emergency.
For me to have an intelligent conversation about the environment, I must be able to integrate the following factors:
Space:
Environmental changes throughout history:
Deterioration in the electromagnetic field:
Geophysical condition of the earth:
Air:
Governance structure:
Governance
Budgets
Energy
Mind control
Smart grid
Debt
Fiat currency
Man-made impacts:
Space fence
Nuclear testing
Nuclear accidents
Global spraying
HAARP
Weather warfare
Energy
Chemicals
Manipulation:
Invisible weaponry and technology:
I am happy to discuss the environment, including the climate, from a vantage point of reality. However, if you censor aspects of reality or uncertainty, I can’t have an intelligent conversation with you about it.
The next time the bully thing happens – or I meet with the implication that I am uncaring or unfeeling because of a need for an integrated analysis – I can just send the person to this post. While I am hoping to have intelligent conversations about the environment with one and all, the time has come for me to stack functions and bow out with a link.
Related Reading
To manmade impacts I would add the damage being done to the upper atmosphere by
rocket launchers into space. You posted an article on this a few months ago which stated the increase in space shots has the potential to destroy the upper atmosphere which protects us from space radiation.
Daniel. Great add. THANKS!
Catherine, As an environment engineer, I say BRAVO. The environmental challenges facing us are multi-faceted and complex, and require integrated solutions. Instead in my field, folks often take a stance on one side of the isle or the other, with a firm belief that “My truth is righter than your truth”, which is ridiculous. I respect your inclusive list and thank you for it. I may use it.
Stacy
Thanks, Stacy. I appreciate that given I know only the money side and what I read and see and you have a much more profound knowledge. I hope you add to it. As Daniel has shown, there’s more! The world needs a really thorough framework – at least we start with one that defines the uncertainty.
Catherine, As an environment engineer, I say BRAVO. The environmental challenges facing us are multi-faceted and complex, and require integrated solutions. Instead in my field, folks often take a stance on one side of the isle or the other, with a firm belief that “My truth is righter than your truth”, which is ridiculous. I respect your inclusive list and thank you for it. I may use it.
Stacy
Thanks, Stacy. I appreciate that given I know only the money side and what I read and see and you have a much more profound knowledge. I hope you add to it. As Daniel has shown, there’s more! The world needs a really thorough framework – at least we start with one that defines the uncertainty.
A simply superb comment!
What I also often miss in conversations with passionate environmentalists who — I do believe — are genuine nature-loving people, is even a small inkling of the powerful intelligence of ‘nature’ and its/her ability to problem-solve on her own. In their views, nature can only be ‘preserved’ or will die, it does not seem to be able to adapt, morphe and transform into a new victory — just as we do in our lives when we are tested and go through crises. And according to them, only WE can save the environment, a view that unconsciously separates us from HER. While in reality we are mutually embedded.
So the possibility of the intelligence or even consciousness of nature should be taken into account. There is so much proof for it.
What is happening in the Noosphere, not just the Biosphere? How does the sphere of consciousness (Vernadsky’s ‘Noosphere’) contribute to and affect the living sphere? Do our thoughts, conversations, intentions, emotions have impact on life?
And, is our Noos/Mind the only one contributing to this sphere of consciousness, or does it continue outward…?
Yes, we have to “shun” (as Catherine says) the centralizers and all their works and “front men” and get back in tune ourselves.
Excellent! I always learn from you, Ulrike! This reminds me of the wise person who upon hearing a strident description of the dimininishment of sun spots and the dire consequences, said, “Perhaps we should all arise every morning and thank the sun for its many blessings.”
A simply superb comment!
What I also often miss in conversations with passionate environmentalists who — I do believe — are genuine nature-loving people, is even a small inkling of the powerful intelligence of ‘nature’ and its/her ability to problem-solve on her own. In their views, nature can only be ‘preserved’ or will die, it does not seem to be able to adapt, morphe and transform into a new victory — just as we do in our lives when we are tested and go through crises. And according to them, only WE can save the environment, a view that unconsciously separates us from HER. While in reality we are mutually embedded.
So the possibility of the intelligence or even consciousness of nature should be taken into account. There is so much proof for it.
What is happening in the Noosphere, not just the Biosphere? How does the sphere of consciousness (Vernadsky’s ‘Noosphere’) contribute to and affect the living sphere? Do our thoughts, conversations, intentions, emotions have impact on life?
And, is our Noos/Mind the only one contributing to this sphere of consciousness, or does it continue outward…?
Yes, we have to “shun” (as Catherine says) the centralizers and all their works and “front men” and get back in tune ourselves.
Excellent! I always learn from you, Ulrike! This reminds me of the wise person who upon hearing a strident description of the dimininishment of sun spots and the dire consequences, said, “Perhaps we should all arise every morning and thank the sun for its many blessings.”
In addition to your thoughtful list, might I add the question: What is the end game for
1) Artificial Intelligence?
2) All the Centralization of Control?
3) Harvesting Money from Productive People and Enterprises
4) Space Exploration
5) All the Deceit and Secrecy about Everything.
Perhaps each answer is something noble, and we only need a good a good explanation to give all of it our own hearty backing.
HaHaHaHa. Just Kidding.
In addition to your thoughtful list, might I add the question: What is the end game for
1) Artificial Intelligence?
2) All the Centralization of Control?
3) Harvesting Money from Productive People and Enterprises
4) Space Exploration
5) All the Deceit and Secrecy about Everything.
Perhaps each answer is something noble, and we only need a good a good explanation to give all of it our own hearty backing.
HaHaHaHa. Just Kidding.