Money & Markets Report: November 11, 2021

Theme:

Central bank control grid construction has begun.

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

99 Comments

  1. Much like what happened in WWII relative to the auto industry and its reduced, civilian auto manufacturing, there is a good possibility that auto production is being scaled back so that the auto manufacturing facilities can be used to work on the construction of components for the smart grid. No business of scale leaves is manufacturing processes stilled. It’s economic suicide. Of course, many of these agreements with the auto manufacturers are likely off the books contracts so, as mentioned, the “air cover” would be to state that auto manufacturing is scaling back due to a “chip shortage.” It is a logical reason as well for why the prices of used cars has sky rocketed if it is planned that new vehicle manufacturing intended to be scaled back. As you mentioned Catherine, the chips are being diverted for another purpose…the grid. It is WWIII after all… being fought with 21st Century economics, psy ops and bio war fare.

    1. I am also wondering if the smart grid usage includes nanotech being used in the injections. I just saw more pictures from a hghly reputable researcher. Unbelievable.

      1. Do you think this is an esoteric issue related to consent?

        Pragmatically it’d be much easier to put nanotech in municipal water, food, spraying, or MMR jabs.

        1. I think they have been putting it in those things all along. Don’t know. That is why it is so important to get to the bottom of the ingredients.

      1. THANKS!
        ALSO WANT TO KNOW…JUST HOW IS IT YOU MANAGE TO SNAP YOUR FINGERS LIKE THAT???
        IMPRESSIVE&GREAT FOR EMPHASIS!!!!!:)

        1. Grew up on the streets of West Philadelphia. It was a basic skill, just like finger shooting bottlecaps.

  2. Can you supply link where I can find the video of Belarus President addressing his cabinet ?
    Thanks in advance

  3. Vis a vis John’s browser issues, Firefox is not a bad choice. I would strongly recommend a plugin called uBlock Origin to ensure he doesn’t see any YouTube ads (or any other ads for that matter).

    The Brave Browser is also very good and has ad-blocking built in by default, but it has limited plugin support and is based on Chrome’s V8 engine (Google) which presents its own risks. For the technological neophyte, Brave is a good choice as it comes “batteries included.”

    There is aftermarket plugin support to re-add Safari’s text highlighting on browsers like Firefox. Here’s one example:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/textmarkerpro/

    As an aside, if John just updated to Yosemite, it means his hardware is pre-2014 and the OS is largely out of date. There are some serious hardware and software security issues with Intel chips and macOS builds of this vintage, namely the Specter, Meltdown, and Intel Management Engine exploits – for the Average Joe it’s probably not a concern, but for a prominent member of “rebel media” I would strongly recommend patching these.

    I’m sure it’s difficult to navigate away from macOS or Windows for a legal professional or video editor on a full-time basis, but John would be well served by a second laptop running some flavor of Linux, ideally one without IntelME like the offerings from Purism.

    At the very least, I hope this information helps with production hiccups! 🙂

    -Josh, https://privacytogo.co

  4. Recently vaccinated athletes collapsing during games is a pretty striking trend. But kids (of unknown vaccination status) collapsing at concerts is a lot less convincing. Could just as easily have been “too drunk” or “too tripping”, etc. — that sort of thing happens regularly. It’s good to talk up events where vaccines are causing collapse in young/healthy people, but only when the data are there.

  5. I don’t know if John Titus reads these comments but regarding Robert v. Mulvihill since its based on an administrations redefinition of immunity, wouldn’t the question of Chevron Deference come into play here? In other words what kind of deference will the courts give the Department of Defense’s interpretation of immunity? My question would be, this policy that is being re-interpreted, does it have criminal charges to go along with it?

    I ask that question because in the case of the US Military 6th District Circuit Court ruling regarding bump stocks it was found that:

    If Chevron Deference is allowed in ambiguous statutes with criminal implications then it means we would 1. allow for ATF to create criminal laws through their interpretation of vague statutes, in this case allow DoD to create criminal laws via interpretation of statute

    2. enforce their own newly created interpretations, 3. get to receive Judicial Deference from the Courts anytime someone wanted to challenge their actions based on their interpretations.

    I am just wondering John, if you are reading this, if any of this would be argued in that Robert v. Mulvihill case.

Comments are closed.