This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
Hey Catherine, about Martin Armstrong, he says that the courts in NY are incredibly corrupt and after chasing away his lawyers he had to represent himself. I believe he says that the judge required him to read that statement, that the bank was secretly trading his accounts and stole the Japanese clients’ money and that those clients refused to bring charges against him. He was held in contempt of court and imprisoned for 7 yrs and only released when his case reached the supreme court.
His track record does seem great, but I’ve found that in real time the calls are often inscrutable, if you get what I mean.
Anyway, I thought that some one who was also framed and abused by lawfare would have had more sympathy for the guy.
I have a lot of experiences with Courts, Cathy. Some judges are clean. Some are dirty, but they are not all dirty. Just because someone said the courts are dirty, does not make it true. I have scores of documents and evidence published on my website and multiple witnesses to testify to the facts in my case. And the important court cases sided with me – and time and US government financial statements and the financial crisis proved me dead on right.
When the investors, prosecutors, the courts, the target and the financial institution all agree on guilt, I have a hard time believing the targets reversal story especially when I believe the NSA and CIA can get whatever digital software they want whenever they want. So the logic does not make sense to me. Ultimately I have no way of getting to the truth without doing hundreds of hours of due diligence. Which I am not going to do because I am not here to be fair to one commentator. I am here to do a great job for you. If I am going to put together an operation that would do extensive due diligence to every commentator in the market who someone suggests should be on the Solari Report, I would have to raise my subscriptions to $5000 a year.
But that all seems unnecessary because I do not believe in black boxes. I have seen them cause more damage than good in the past. So this comes down to bandwidth. We run a high filter and there is a long line up that people who pass that filter and they get first priority to be on – that means no time for people who cut lower on the filter. Is that filter intuitive? Yes.
Since everyone is free to listen to Martin’s interviews or subscribe to his service, no censorship here. There is plenty of his content available to you and you are free to watch him and whomever you want.
Hey Catherine, about Martin Armstrong, he says that the courts in NY are incredibly corrupt and after chasing away his lawyers he had to represent himself. I believe he says that the judge required him to read that statement, that the bank was secretly trading his accounts and stole the Japanese clients’ money and that those clients refused to bring charges against him. He was held in contempt of court and imprisoned for 7 yrs and only released when his case reached the supreme court.
His track record does seem great, but I’ve found that in real time the calls are often inscrutable, if you get what I mean.
Anyway, I thought that some one who was also framed and abused by lawfare would have had more sympathy for the guy.
I have a lot of experiences with Courts, Cathy. Some judges are clean. Some are dirty, but they are not all dirty. Just because someone said the courts are dirty, does not make it true. I have scores of documents and evidence published on my website and multiple witnesses to testify to the facts in my case. And the important court cases sided with me – and time and US government financial statements and the financial crisis proved me dead on right.
When the investors, prosecutors, the courts, the target and the financial institution all agree on guilt, I have a hard time believing the targets reversal story especially when I believe the NSA and CIA can get whatever digital software they want whenever they want. So the logic does not make sense to me. Ultimately I have no way of getting to the truth without doing hundreds of hours of due diligence. Which I am not going to do because I am not here to be fair to one commentator. I am here to do a great job for you. If I am going to put together an operation that would do extensive due diligence to every commentator in the market who someone suggests should be on the Solari Report, I would have to raise my subscriptions to $5000 a year.
But that all seems unnecessary because I do not believe in black boxes. I have seen them cause more damage than good in the past. So this comes down to bandwidth. We run a high filter and there is a long line up that people who pass that filter and they get first priority to be on – that means no time for people who cut lower on the filter. Is that filter intuitive? Yes.
Since everyone is free to listen to Martin’s interviews or subscribe to his service, no censorship here. There is plenty of his content available to you and you are free to watch him and whomever you want.
Ty for your thoughtful answer.