This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
“We must be self-sufficient in our health. There is nothing better to help us accomplish that goal than homeopathy. You can buy 100 remedies and deal with almost anything.”
Leslie Manookian talks about her flexible approach as a homeopathic practitioner, which is to start with basic protocols but draw on her classical homeopathic training if more stubborn or chronic issues are in the mix.
If this is an informed consent world, it seems like personal and national sovereignty are being stolen from us, without our consent….
Whatever happened to “tighten our belt” to pay off our debt?
Do you see any option, to take a step backwards with new political leadership?
If I prefer to deal locally, maintain a small digital footprint, invest in the people bank, use dollars instead of crypto, what would you predict for me ten years from now? factoring in inflation?
Many thanks for this very informative presentation!
I was greatly looking forward to this presentation, and you surely delivered! Thank you so much! And many thanks for the links provided!
Since brevity is the source of with, I will be brief.
There are very few hills I will die on. This is one of those hills.
The fundamental principles of homeopathy are: 1) The Law of Similars, 2) the Minimum Dose, and 3) the Single Remedy. The fourth principle is the Vital Force (called chi in Chinese medicine or prana in Indian medicine, although they are not exact equivalents of each other. There are philosophical differences between them.)
When you read the Banerji Protocol, they literally state in their book that they are not basing their protocol on 1) The Law of Similars, 2) the Minimum Dose, 3) the single remedy, and 4) the Vital Force. By definition, this is not homeopathy.
I will give a similarly outrageous example of what that means by this. I will use Hamlet as an example. I have decided that 1) Hamlet talks too much, so I’ll cut out his soliloquies, 2) get rid of all those rhyming couplets while I’m at it, and 3) decide that iambs are no longer relevant for today’s times, so I’ll just get rid of those too. What do you have left? Nothing identifying the play as Hamlet or Shakespeare. But I’ve made Hamlet accessible to the poor at a cheap price. That is what the Banerji protocol, is.
I quote excerpts from P.P. Wells, one of the greatest homeopaths who ever breathed, from the North American Journal of Homeopathy 1878-1879; 27: 90 – 104:
“So then the practice of homeopathy is ever and always the finding of the specific for the case [the individual sitting in front of you that is sick] to be cured. And this finding is to be repeated in every succeeding case, individually, to the end of time, though the thousands of succeeding cases may be called by the same name. This is homeopathy, and this is its practice.
… The finding and administering of what is the most similar is the practice of homeopathy, not the giving of pellets or pills, large or small, of high or low potency, or of no potency at all. A man may be a graduate of a homeopathic college and put “Homeopath” on his sign and business card, procure his medicines from Boerike and Tafel [homeopathic pharmacy] , give them in high or low potency or in the crude form, and never make a homeopathic prescription, but by accident, in his life…
It is another important element in the nature of law [of Similars] that it is wholly mandatory. It commands. It neither solicits nor permits….
If this be a law of nature governing practical medicine, then improvement in this most important of practical sciences is only to be realized by a more perfect understanding of the law, a more strict compliance with its requirements, and a more perfect knowledge of the agencies which it employs in giving health to the sick [individual] and relief from pain. Improvement in therapeutics was sought outside of law for three thousand years. The result was certainly not such as to warrant a longer search in that direction”.
If you read the credible homeopathic journals from the 1800s, it is very clear that there are two paradigms at war with each other. One was the “Old Guard”, those homeopaths who followed Hahnemann’s teachings explicitly and obtained results that are, to this day, are so brilliant that one suspects they were falsifying their results. They weren’t. The other group was “The Progressives” who wanted to modernize, update, improve, and tweak Hahnemann because they knew better. They obtained results that were along the same lines as conventional medicine has today. Yes, there were many “homeopathic schools” in the 1800, but they were homeopathic in name only. They were eclectics (the Banerjis of modern times). The same arguments of the 1800s to “progress” are the same arguments being made now. The same techniques to “progress” in the 1800s are the same techniques as now. Nothing new to be seen here. Same old, same old.
I have no idea if the Banerji protocol is effective. I have no idea if Practical Homeopathy (trademarked) is effective. That is not my point. If it works, great. But it ain’t homeopathy, folks.
I will take the liberty of asking the question “What is homeopathy?” within a modern context:
Question: What is a woman?
Answer: It doesn’t matter. All you have to do is identify as one.
I suspect this young lady’s approach is more to your understanding of homeopathy. I would be very curious to know your opinion.
Ep 158: Homeopathy’s Hidden History: Miasms, Water Memory & Homeopathic Hospitals with Melissa Kupsch
Released on Apr 1, 2025
Jennifer gives her high marks – we are hoping to have her on in the future.
Thank you for this wonderful interview with Leslie. I have followed homeopathy from the sidelines for many years, and have used and recommended over the counter remedies with some success. I much prefer this to pharmaceutical medicines, from which I have almost died.
In March of this year, I was exposed to a massive amount of electromagnetic radiation for about 45 minutes when my phone carrier incorrectly installed a new router next to an old style cordless phone base, connected by a line splitter. The phone tech was clueless about EMR dangers!
Fortunately I had recently purchased a Safe and Sound EMR meter (guaranteed accurate), and I was able to SEE the exposure level, though EMR is invisible to our senses. Their close proximity caused them to synergistically energize each other, and the resulting over 1,000,000 mvolts/meter squared nearly did me in (Havanna Syndrome effects).
As an aside, I have been following the EMR debate for some years, and I had previously hardwired my computer, printer, TV and retained all the incandescent lights I could find to minimize exposure.
The new CHD 5G site offers a tremendous amount of solid information about EMR, but not much in the realm of recovery suggestions. Because I am an Applied Clinical Nutritionist, I immediately began supporting myself with therapeutic grade herbal nutrients and other very high quality supplements. After six months, I figure I am about halfway through recovery.
This presentation with Leslie caused me to revisit my copy of the Banerji Protocols, and low and behold, they provide a remedy for radiation exposure: X-Ray 200 C. !!! Of course, I immediately found Hahnemann Laboratories, Inc., who could sell it to me. It will arrive on Monday. (Hahnemannlabs.com)
I provide this information for those who have experienced EMR injuries and want to try something safe at a reasonable price.
I am absolutely thrilled that there is something to try, besides supporting the basic body and organ systems.
Thank you Leslie for re-opening this door… 🙂
BRAVO!
I broke a tooth. I’ve heard about certain minerals which can rebuild teeth and repair cavities but in my case I think the damage is too far gone I and have to have it pulled. I can’t imagine having it pulled without anesthetic; on the other hand I am very concerned about what’s in the shots.
Any advice or suggestions?
Got lots of responses by email. Looking for time to batch and post!
This is a good question. I don’t know the answer. Will search.
continued comment…
If this is an informed consent world, it seems like personal and national sovereignty are being stolen from us, without our consent….
Whatever happened to “tighten our belt” to pay off our debt?
Do you see any option, to take a step backwards with new political leadership?
If I prefer to deal locally, maintain a small digital footprint, invest in the people bank, use dollars instead of crypto, what would you predict for me ten years from now? factoring in inflation?
Many thanks for this very informative presentation!
I was greatly looking forward to this presentation, and you surely delivered! Thank you so much! And many thanks for the links provided!
Since brevity is the source of with, I will be brief.
There are very few hills I will die on. This is one of those hills.
The fundamental principles of homeopathy are: 1) The Law of Similars, 2) the Minimum Dose, and 3) the Single Remedy. The fourth principle is the Vital Force (called chi in Chinese medicine or prana in Indian medicine, although they are not exact equivalents of each other. There are philosophical differences between them.)
When you read the Banerji Protocol, they literally state in their book that they are not basing their protocol on 1) The Law of Similars, 2) the Minimum Dose, 3) the single remedy, and 4) the Vital Force. By definition, this is not homeopathy.
I will give a similarly outrageous example of what that means by this. I will use Hamlet as an example. I have decided that 1) Hamlet talks too much, so I’ll cut out his soliloquies, 2) get rid of all those rhyming couplets while I’m at it, and 3) decide that iambs are no longer relevant for today’s times, so I’ll just get rid of those too. What do you have left? Nothing identifying the play as Hamlet or Shakespeare. But I’ve made Hamlet accessible to the poor at a cheap price. That is what the Banerji protocol, is.
I quote excerpts from P.P. Wells, one of the greatest homeopaths who ever breathed, from the North American Journal of Homeopathy 1878-1879; 27: 90 – 104:
“So then the practice of homeopathy is ever and always the finding of the specific for the case [the individual sitting in front of you that is sick] to be cured. And this finding is to be repeated in every succeeding case, individually, to the end of time, though the thousands of succeeding cases may be called by the same name. This is homeopathy, and this is its practice.
… The finding and administering of what is the most similar is the practice of homeopathy, not the giving of pellets or pills, large or small, of high or low potency, or of no potency at all. A man may be a graduate of a homeopathic college and put “Homeopath” on his sign and business card, procure his medicines from Boerike and Tafel [homeopathic pharmacy] , give them in high or low potency or in the crude form, and never make a homeopathic prescription, but by accident, in his life…
It is another important element in the nature of law [of Similars] that it is wholly mandatory. It commands. It neither solicits nor permits….
If this be a law of nature governing practical medicine, then improvement in this most important of practical sciences is only to be realized by a more perfect understanding of the law, a more strict compliance with its requirements, and a more perfect knowledge of the agencies which it employs in giving health to the sick [individual] and relief from pain. Improvement in therapeutics was sought outside of law for three thousand years. The result was certainly not such as to warrant a longer search in that direction”.
If you read the credible homeopathic journals from the 1800s, it is very clear that there are two paradigms at war with each other. One was the “Old Guard”, those homeopaths who followed Hahnemann’s teachings explicitly and obtained results that are, to this day, are so brilliant that one suspects they were falsifying their results. They weren’t. The other group was “The Progressives” who wanted to modernize, update, improve, and tweak Hahnemann because they knew better. They obtained results that were along the same lines as conventional medicine has today. Yes, there were many “homeopathic schools” in the 1800, but they were homeopathic in name only. They were eclectics (the Banerjis of modern times). The same arguments of the 1800s to “progress” are the same arguments being made now. The same techniques to “progress” in the 1800s are the same techniques as now. Nothing new to be seen here. Same old, same old.
I have no idea if the Banerji protocol is effective. I have no idea if Practical Homeopathy (trademarked) is effective. That is not my point. If it works, great. But it ain’t homeopathy, folks.
I will take the liberty of asking the question “What is homeopathy?” within a modern context:
Question: What is a woman?
Answer: It doesn’t matter. All you have to do is identify as one.
I suspect this young lady’s approach is more to your understanding of homeopathy. I would be very curious to know your opinion.
Ep 158: Homeopathy’s Hidden History: Miasms, Water Memory & Homeopathic Hospitals with Melissa Kupsch
Released on Apr 1, 2025
https://thewayfwrd.com/podcast/ep-158-homeopathys-hidden-history-miasms-water-memory-homeopathic-hospitals-with-melissa-kupsch/
Jennifer gives her high marks – we are hoping to have her on in the future.
Thank you for this wonderful interview with Leslie. I have followed homeopathy from the sidelines for many years, and have used and recommended over the counter remedies with some success. I much prefer this to pharmaceutical medicines, from which I have almost died.
In March of this year, I was exposed to a massive amount of electromagnetic radiation for about 45 minutes when my phone carrier incorrectly installed a new router next to an old style cordless phone base, connected by a line splitter. The phone tech was clueless about EMR dangers!
Fortunately I had recently purchased a Safe and Sound EMR meter (guaranteed accurate), and I was able to SEE the exposure level, though EMR is invisible to our senses. Their close proximity caused them to synergistically energize each other, and the resulting over 1,000,000 mvolts/meter squared nearly did me in (Havanna Syndrome effects).
As an aside, I have been following the EMR debate for some years, and I had previously hardwired my computer, printer, TV and retained all the incandescent lights I could find to minimize exposure.
The new CHD 5G site offers a tremendous amount of solid information about EMR, but not much in the realm of recovery suggestions. Because I am an Applied Clinical Nutritionist, I immediately began supporting myself with therapeutic grade herbal nutrients and other very high quality supplements. After six months, I figure I am about halfway through recovery.
This presentation with Leslie caused me to revisit my copy of the Banerji Protocols, and low and behold, they provide a remedy for radiation exposure: X-Ray 200 C. !!! Of course, I immediately found Hahnemann Laboratories, Inc., who could sell it to me. It will arrive on Monday. (Hahnemannlabs.com)
I provide this information for those who have experienced EMR injuries and want to try something safe at a reasonable price.
I am absolutely thrilled that there is something to try, besides supporting the basic body and organ systems.
Thank you Leslie for re-opening this door… 🙂
BRAVO!
I broke a tooth. I’ve heard about certain minerals which can rebuild teeth and repair cavities but in my case I think the damage is too far gone I and have to have it pulled. I can’t imagine having it pulled without anesthetic; on the other hand I am very concerned about what’s in the shots.
Any advice or suggestions?
Got lots of responses by email. Looking for time to batch and post!
This is a good question. I don’t know the answer. Will search.