Food for the Soul: “Impressionists 1874” – How It All Began
Become a member: Subscribe
NTS Headlines
Headlines by Category
Headlines by Year
Solari’s Building Wealth materials are organized to inspire and support your personal strategic and financial planning.
Building Wealth
This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
Missing Money
Articles and video discussions of the $21 Trillion dollars missing from the U.S. government
Connect with the wider network of like-minded Solari subscribers using our in-house social media platform, Solari Connect.
No posts
Food for the Soul: “Impressionists 1874” – How It All Began
By Nina Heyn — Your Culture Scout
No matter how much or how little we know about fine art, we can all spot the difference between paintings by old masters and the art that was launched by post-Classical artists—Impressionists, Modernists, and representatives of all subsequent movements, from Surrealism to Abstractionism.
There are various reasons for this difference. In the world before the Enlightenment, the majority of people believed that the world created by God was perfect in every aspect and to paint was to get as close as possible to that perfection. The Renaissance humanists sought perfection for perfection’s sake—the more naturalistic the representation, the better was the painting. The belief in a “Great Chain of Being” (the medieval concept of the God-ordained hierarchy of creatures, from angels to worms) contributed to the expectation that all things painted—people, minerals, or plants—should be rendered with naturalism. Artists like Cézanne and Matisse were attacked viciously for years by art critics who were incensed that a human face would be green or a table crooked, with apples ready to slide off.
