Money & Markets Report: August 7, 2025

Justin Woods
August 7, 2025

Money & Markets

Mega-Rich Madness

August 7, 2025

Money & Markets

Mega-Rich Madness

In this episode of Money & Markets, we delve into the theme of ‘Mega-Rich Madness,’ exploring how the ultra-wealthy are driving society toward destruction.

Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus analyze the growing disassociation of the mega-rich from societal welfare, historical examples of societal pushback, and current parallels from Augustus in the Roman Empire to modern-day labor unions.

Additionally, they discuss the implications of stablecoins, the alarming rise of AI data centers, and geopolitical tensions, including U.S. trade policies influenced by Israeli interests and the economic dominance of China.


latest money & markets



Latest solari report & ask catherine



LATEST SOLARI culture


MOVIE

BOOK REVIEW

MUSIC

HERO

ACTION


Log in or subscribe to the Solari Report to enjoy full access to exclusive articles and features.

Already a subscriber?

  • Weekly interviews, including the popular Money & Markets show
  • Quarterly deep dives into major trends affecting you day-to-day
  • Aggregation of the most relevant news stories
  • Subscriber-only events and a digital platform to connect with other subscribers
  • Weekly subscriber Q&A sessions with Catherine and the Solari team
Learn More

share Share

105 Comments

  1. https://www.ft.com/content/356674b0-9f1d-4f95-b1d5-f27570379a9b

    Commsection an outlier. Typically heavily supportive of govt narrative – one presumes it is heavily curated. But today the comments on this article on the Online Safety Bill have gone way off piste, and in volume, too. Spent quite a lot of energy 3 yrs ago trying to wake people up to this, but people just looked blankly st one. Perhaps this is a tiny straw in the wind that people have had enough and have worked out exactly who their enemy is.

  2. The mass shooting events in NYC and Reno, NV yesterday (7/28) could mark the beginning of a new phase/mode of low intensity conflict in the US.

    Enough fatalities to qualify as mass shooting events. Seemingly random to escalate tension. Widely reported in mainstream media to amplify impact.

    NYC shooter “turning the gun on himself” on 33rd floor – numerology significance.

    In any event, time to be more careful when out and about.

    1. Admittedly, I haven’t done any research into these events, but are we sure they definitely went down exactly as described?

      They’re so recent, surely we don’t know what happened yet. Only a lengthy and thorough investigation will tell us that.

      My trust in officialdom and the corporate media to tell us the truth about such things is now zero.

        1. Can’t help regularly watching mainstream TV news via family who insist on it. So I try to make use of the time by looking for any deeper messages. Observation is that currently the news editors are pushing both mass casualty events and aviation accidents/problems daily.

          Lately there is no broadcast without some combination of at least 3 stories of aviation problems (a recent example was a 777 en route to Europe that lost an engine on takeoff from Dulles – a item that would have never made the national news in the past) and mass casualty events. The latter are smaller scale than typical. This suggests that those who curate the network news are making a concerted effort to discourage the public from air travel and being in public places for some reason. Or?

      1. Well, what about that earthquake in Russia’s Kamchatka peninsula, a region well known for its active volcanism? Joseph has some typical off-the-end-of-the-high-octane-speculation-twig and Wile E. Coyote nosedive into the speculation canyon on this story, and judging from the emails he’s been getting about it, a lot of people are entertaining very similar speculations:
        https://gizadeathstar.com/2025/07/news-and-views-from-the-nefarium-july-31-2025/

  3. I received the email on Parvin Hedged Equity Solari World Fund. Can you help me understand this from my advisor? Am I missing something? 2 things they say: 1) it is an expensive fund at 2.25%, and 2) Per Morningstar you can see there is a vast difference between Investment (how the funds are actually invested) and Category (how the fund is claimed to be invested). How would you respond to this?

Comments are closed.


© 2025 The Solari Report