86 Comments

1. Prof. Clyde Wilson (shotwellpublishing.com) is a friend of Franklin Sanders and a very good friend of Dr. Thomas Fleming (fleming.foundation)

2. Prof. Clyde Wilson (shotwellpublishing.com) is a friend of Franklin Sanders and a very good friend of Dr. Thomas Fleming (fleming.foundation)

3. I’m sure that the “bioweapons” labs are money laundering ops and nothing more. But I would say there is the possibility that the “bioweapons” are actually toxins, not “organisms.”

   Remember what Jon Rappoport has repeatedly shown: NO ONE HAS PROVEN THAT VIRUSES EXIST. And Jon is absolutely correct. The idiotic weekly fearmongering about a new and improved virus on the loose is just so ridiculous, how anyone can be snookered by this baloney is beyond me.

4. I’m sure that the “bioweapons” labs are money laundering ops and nothing more. But I would say there is the possibility that the “bioweapons” are actually toxins, not “organisms.”

   Remember what Jon Rappoport has repeatedly shown: NO ONE HAS PROVEN THAT VIRUSES EXIST. And Jon is absolutely correct. The idiotic weekly fearmongering about a new and improved virus on the loose is just so ridiculous, how anyone can be snookered by this baloney is beyond me.

5. I saw Madame Butterfly in Rome in the early 1970s. It was fabulous. I didn’t have the appreciation for opera at the time. Now I cherish the memory.

6. I saw Madame Butterfly in Rome in the early 1970s. It was fabulous. I didn’t have the appreciation for opera at the time. Now I cherish the memory.

7. Catherine, do you believe that Kennedy would sincerely disavow his egregious and thoroughly disgusting stance towards those of us who disagree with his left liberal positions? In addition to guns, I’m thinking of the global warming baloney, ultra-Israel treason and “safe vaccines.” I don’t trust him.

   1. Kennedy had promised a write up on his Israel policy – have not seen it yet and don’t understand his position yet. He gave me a book recommendation which I will try to read. He came out pro 2nd amendment with a very good defense – then waffled by saying he would agree with Congress if they reversed the 2nd amendment by a vote – which is not constitutional. I thought he had backed off on the global warming but have not investigated.
      ON vax I understand the strategy. He is trying to hang pharma on their own petard. It is not my strategy – mine is to give a clear honest map to my subscribers and to protect them from the risks of the environment – little to no time to try to appeal to people who believe in the official narrative which is why I have no future in politics.

      My point of view is if you can not protect Israel against Netanyahu then you can not protect the US Treasury from him and his gang – so yes disappointing.

      I liked his VP choice as someone to advise on technology. But she is not qualified to serve as President or VP – unfortunately it shifts his campaign into an entertainment space. If his running mate will fund getting him on the ballot, I understand the logic but he ends up in a corner that is going to cut into gravitas in the heartland.

      So yes, RFK is losing trust. That said, I am deeply grateful for many of his efforts and his willingess to bring transparency on many issues. I still intend to help him and any candidate on the financial issues when and if they ask.

      1. Early on in the running, RFK Jr stated he would debate anyone on any subject. He was invited to debate Max Blumenthal on the Jimmy Dore show after his appearance there on his stance on Israel and Palestine. He said yes and then his campaign reneged. He has since been unwilling to follow through.

         That disqualified him for me. His later comments about Palestine were absurd.

         His Second amendment waffling is indicative of lack of willingness to clearly state his position. Why?

         His vaccine message – good.
         His environmental efforts- good.
         Core values – unknown.

Comments are closed.