Post your comments and questions for July, 2016.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

71 Comments

  1. Catherine,
    Looks like the iceberg of corruption may include Comey. The cancer of corruption is probably so big now that to try to kill it would kill the probably kill the government. It’s interesting how the same people keep getting recycled to keep the corrupt game going.

    Chad

    http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/07/13/fbi-director-comey-board-member-of-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-hsbc/

    https://investmentwatchblog.com/fbi-director-comey-is-a-board-member-of-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-hsbc/

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262389/comey-clintons-and-clemency-lloyd-billingsley

    1. I would point out that he refused George W. Bush’s order during the Ashcroft hospital incident and this time around documented in his announcement and testimony enough findings to prove that Clinton lied to Congress, leaving it easily available for the American voters to act, let alone Congress to prosecute.

      1. Of course, you’re right. His actions at the hospital were admirable and he did present enough evidence to hurt Hillary, but it came at an extremely high price, perhaps a price that was too high. I’ll reserve my final assessment when I see what happens regarding Hillary’s lies to Congress and the malfeasance at the Clinton Foundation during her time at the state department. If he makes the right choices, he may become the greatest FBI director ever; if he doesn’t, he could go down in infamy.

        1. I am not saying he did the right thing. His big problem IMO was that his boss briefed B. Clinton on what H. Clinton had to do to skate the interview…and for all we know provided a list of names of witnesses that had to be “deleted.” IMO, the Bilderbergers ordered that Clinton would be the nominee. We have dueling governance systems.

          1. With the Koch Brothers switching to Clinton, this will be more than a little interesting. The DNC Convention is not going to go well with Sanders supporters pissed to the point of creating a scene. As you point out, Catherine, this could be a challenge to the Bilderbergers and while they might have ordered it, this could be a first for people too pissed to simply let the fake election ride.

  2. Catherine,
    Here are a few comments regarding policing in the U.S. Is it any wonder that we have an increasing militarization of the police when our politicians and the citizenry buy into/support the WAR on drugs, the WAR on poverty, the WAR on this, that, and the other thing? What people are supporting is a war against themselves. Virtually everyone in the country knows someone who does or has done drugs, legal and illegal. The police are GUARDIANS, not warriors and everyone desperately needs to realize this difference. (As a slight aside, words matter and yet you see politicians, the media, and many others purposely misusing words constantly to deceive others. This seems to be straight out of the Ministry of Truth from 1984).
    I get a little irritated when people quote some statistics about how police officers deaths are down and then infer or say that we shouldn’t partake of the hero worship of officers, because of this statistical trend. First of all, no officer I know wants to be worshiped as a hero; they simply want understanding and some level of respect. And often the officers who do heroic things just say that they were just doing their job. Do the people who come up with the don’t worship police meme consider that the art and science of policing has evolved since the 70s and that this evolution is at least partly responsible for the reduction in police officer shootings and assaults? For instance, officers in two person patrols are less likely to be assaulted than one person patrols and many police unions have pushed agencies to have two person patrols.
    Do these people realize the incredible amount of stress that officers can be subjected to on a routine basis, depending on where they serve? Do they know how many officers have serious health problems by the time that they retire? Do they know that some officers suffer from PTSD and that about 125 officers commit suicide every year? Do these people think that it is the psychopathic officers who are committing suicide (Yes, unfortunately, there are some psychopathic officers out there)? No, it’s often good people who have been driven to the edge and don’t have proper coping skills or access to adequate help. Do these people realize that police officers as a whole defuse numerous volatile situations every day so that nobody gets hurt?
    Do these people realize that an officer cannot lose a fight, because if he/she does, his/her opponent now has access to the officer’s gun, which could immediately endanger others? How many of the people shot by officers are fighting with the officers and attempting to get the officer’s gun? I would encourage people to go on youtube and search for officer shot during traffic stop and see how many videos come up (97,600 as of today).
    The vast majority of the officers I know are for the second amendment and are not in favor of more gun control, including myself. Yes, some officers do want more gun control, but most of them are in urban areas where gang and drug activity are out of control. Do the people mentioned above realize that the majority of officers are not supportive of Obama’s gun control proposals?

    http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/p1_gunsurveysummary_2013.pdf

    The police can only do so much and they are constantly being asked to do things that are not really police functions and that leads to the police being disliked more and more, because the police don’t really belong there. The vast majority of the time, government is reactive and it is someone (or a group of people) who asks for government intervention, in this case, the police. Well, these people who ask for the police better have a very good understanding of what the police are, before they ask for intervention. They often should be asking the government for something else and/or taking responsibilities for themselves. For instance, the fact that we have so many police officers in schools is indicative of severe problems within the family unit and the administration of our schools. A bedrock of society is a functioning family unit; everything else grows from there.
    Furthermore, when people want some new law, they should realize that the police will be forced to enforce it, whether the police want to or not. That is the police’s function and people should not be upset with the police for enforcing a law that they don’t like. They should be mad at the politicians who voted for it and/or their fellow citizens who requested it.
    Police are under pressure to write tickets and seize assets to make up for budget shortfalls. This pressure comes from the top and there are citizens out there that are fine with this…….until it’s them who gets ticketed. These are just two more examples of the police function being perverted by various actors, some of whom are well-intentioned, but who are misguided. People need to stop asking the police to address nearly everything that is wrong with our society, which dilutes from one of their main duties, which is to apprehend the predators in our society.
    And yes, there does need to be improvements within policing regarding hiring practices, training, and operating procedures and increased accountability. We all have room for improvement. Some of this improvement is related to what you brought up and it is poor policies and programs that often originate with the federal government that need to be eliminated or modified. But, this police vs. society meme is just another dialectic meant to keep the general populace fighting one another. What people need to focus on is the massive criminality/corruption occurring at the top and the constant changing of the rules of the game to benefit the very few at the expense of the many. The police cannot function without the support of a community and the community cannot survive without the police, unless they want to live under the rule of the jungle and not the rule of law, which, again, points to the near lawlessness at the very top of our society.
    Lastly, referring to the police as “popos” is part and parcel of the problem of a lack of proper respect for the function that the police have in society and the individuals who are in police service. Again, words matter.

    What happens to a society that starts to stone the keepers (guardians) at the gate?

    https://books.google.com/books?id=-mPbVYM_HQoC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=stoning+the+guardians+at+the+gate&source=bl&ots=YqlV8ACY3q&sig=HEyfPy8ghsQbc-oeErzzsW-luc4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNj5mM6PDNAhUrBsAKHQC9C-8Q6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=stoning%20the%20guardians%20at%20the%20gate&f=false

    Chad

    P.S. One of my spiritual teachers told me the following, “Where there is no love, there is law.” We need more of the former and less of the latter.

    1. Chad:

      Great comments. IMO the vast majority of Americans have good thoughts about and support their local police. There is currently millions if not billions pouring into sabotaging the policy as an effort to centralize local control. Police are in the squeeze between out economic dependency on war and organized crime and our need to pretend we are lawful. They are in the squeeze between all the divide and conquers. They are in the squeeze of the slow burn and household inflation. They are in the crosshairs of centralizing local control. The goal is for the local constituencies to not see their natural allies and organize. Which is what we need to do. But you have to organize locally with the people who are willing to take responsibility and push the red button and can remain grounded despite the entrainment. That ain’t everyone.

  3. Comment regarding recent posting of “Journal of Practical Ethics A Journal of Philosophy, Applied to the Real World Going Viral: Vaccines, Free Speech, and the Harm Principle, Oxford Uehiro Prize in Practical Ethics 2014-15
    Catherine. This article is worthy of continued strategic discussions with our Solari audience. Vaccine safety is NOT, nor ever should be a settled matter. While I am a scientist and not an attorney, in my opinion, what is suggested here is in complete violation of our human rights, personal right to protect oneself or property, and completely against the scientific method. This has no basis under the US system of governance.
    This important foundational article gives the public a glimpse of very real global discussions and scenarios that are being deliberated to ensure high vaccine coverage for existing vaccine and new vaccines introduced to the public with minimal resistence at a later date. To me this suggests a new tactic of ongoing efforts formulate policy and law that further shields very probable government sanctioned killing or injury for the ‘public good’. (And of course processes for releasing legal liability for industry and service delivery providers of vaccines). It does go without saying that the dilemma posed is the risk and harm of not vaccinating against certain diseases as good public health policy and risk to especially vulnerable populations. This is not an easy situation and this understanding must be respected as well. Yet, the continued efforts to downplay vaccine safety, especially at a level of public discourse is unethical, immoral, and also, I believe, against the law. Discussions on the risks of vaccination MUST always continue by public officials, the scientific community, public interest groups and global advisory committees. I am intentionally leaving out industry because I believe that it is WE the people and our democratically elected governments who should and MUST take back the power as consumers to dictate the terms.
    Vaccine safety is NOT a settled matter. By their own admission, CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO, and pharmaceutical industry readily acknowledge that no vaccine is 100% safe which is evidenced in various ways. Some of these include: 1) the numerous court settled vaccine damage compensation cases in the US and UK and the presence of the Vaccine Compensation Fund, 2) the amass of scientifically reviewed articles and published books that continue to demonstrate that the ‘science is simply not settled’ on vaccine safety and risk vs benefit – this also includes the periodic National Institute of Medicine scientific reviews on vaccine safety, risk and warnings of adverse events; ; 3) the black box labels on vaccine vials warning practitioners and the public of rare yet real adverse events; 4) the ongoing global policy, and various philosophical/ethical debates on basic human rights and who owns our bodies with the ever increasing ‘for the greater public good’ argument being used to introduce new technologies and policies, and 5) reports from the ongoing work of WHO’s Global Advisory Committee and SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group of Experts) who review new vaccines, deliberate their safety and set policy directives globally. For example, in the 1990’s, WHO’s SAGE committee has had in their scope critical discussions with private industry and NGOs on the impact of vaccine adverse events on immunization coverage. With new vaccine initiatives. (GPV-CVI/SAGE.98/WP.08)
    WHO’s Vaccine Safety Committee explicitly states that “There is no such thing as a perfect vaccine which protects everyone who receives it AND is entirely safe for everyone” and then offer conditions and guidelines for monitoring vaccine safety and responding to adverse events when they do occur (http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/detection/AEFI/en/) . This is especially critical in light of the fact that no longitudinal studies are in place to systematically monitor the long term negative effects of accumulative vaccinations on populations. This is well understood in the Pharmaco-vigilence and environmental health scientific communities.

    Moreover, disturbing in my mind is the question of who gets to shape the discourse on these very real and significant outstanding issues if dissent is shut down as put forth in this article. At risk is the crumbling of a fundamental pillar of an open democratic society through suppression of dissent. Here individual liberties are at stake and an individual’s right to protect himself and his property (our own body) is guaranteed in our constitution.

    Finally, equally as disturbing is that the scientific method itself is in serious jeopardy of being shut down. The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.” (Wikipedia definition) As a research scientist, I can say this last point, ‘correcting and integrating previous knowledge’, is so vital to the scientific method. As new technology advances, new scientific knowledge, research methods, and techniques become available, we must be able to, in a politically neutral climate, identify and correct those medical practices or public health policies which ultimately cause us harm as individuals and at a population level. Scientists must be able to operate under conditions where inquiry can be unimpeded. Our personal liberties, our health and public safety depends on this. We have so many examples historically where this did not occur. In sum, the science of vaccine safety is NOT settled.

    Respectfully submitted, AB

      1. Thanks, Allison. I posted because IMO it is a significant trial balloon.

  4. Hi Catherine,

    I like to share with an incredible experience of healing that is not very common.

    For the past few years I have been dealing with strange symptoms that was making me really sick. I am very much into alternative healing and medicine tried a lot of different therapies and nothing worked.
    It got so bad I said to myself, that’s it I’m going to a doctor. Went in and out of doctors offices for 3 years and nothing. They didn’t find anything wrong with me. Until one day a friend suggested I take a lyme disease
    test. When I reviewed the symptoms for lyme, I had pretty much all of the symptoms. I took the test and in order to be clinically diagnosed with lyme the test comprises of 10 bands of bacteria and a patient
    needs to be tested positive for 5 out of 10 bands. I got 2 out of 10. I had a jerk of a doctor who instantly ruled out lyme. I was pretty much on my own to figure my health out. There are a lot controversies around lyme disease.
    Different practitioners dispute the tests. There are specialized doctors called lyme literate doctors that charge an obscene about of money for a visit and of course it’s not covered by insurance.

    So I dug into the internet and found this therapy called apitherapy aka bee venom therapy, simply put being stung by bees. These little creatures have some magical healing properties. There are many healing components to the
    venom including 50 unknown components that scientists haven’t figured out. The venom tiggers the body’s healing response acting out as an anti-immflamtory, anti-viral, antibacterial, and much more. Since doing the therapy, it has changed my life.
    It’s still a working in progress with huge steps in the right direction. I feel like I’m getting my health and life back.

    There are other things that I’ve noticed that have been happening. I listened to Jay D’s show on I think transhumanism, you posted the link on Solari. The guest he had on talked about radiation from wifi and how it was internally crystallizing our bodies.
    For the last 6 years I’ve been working from home with a wifi router right on top of me. After hearing the show, I decided to take a break from wifi. One day after my therapy, in the middle of the night, (I swear my life I felt this happen) I had a sensation of razor
    blades moving through the side of my neck. It was weird. It made me think, most therapies might not work if there is some kind of calcification happening inside the body. Maybe the road to healing is to some how decalcify the body first in order for organs to do their part in the healing process.

    The reality is there are so many external factors that are simply making people sick. I feel like I am constantly under attack. Thank god for therapies like this one that lead to a path of healing. I do have to admit I have been hesitant to share this story
    publicly for fear of some kind of crazy regulation banning it. I thought more about it, what can the government do stop people getting stung by bees…? Also, I need to include taking other elements of the bee like propolis, bee pollen, and royal jelly are necessary for the successful of the therapy.

    Another plus, the bee venom increases the dopamine in the brain so I’m constantly in a good mood! It explains why they are trying o kill off the bees. They are so vital our eco-system.

    I hope sharing this story will help others who are struggling with their health. It’s the worst position a person can be put in. I hope someone in the Solari community benefits from it.

    All the best,
    Najat

    1. The police and the general population are being squeezed by covert operations designed in this case:

      1. To get the mess in DC off the front page
      2. Militarize the police
      3. Achieve gun control

      Actions we should take:

      1. Turn off/throw out TVs and corporate media
      2. Get to know our local Sheriff and police chief – determine what we can do to support them and support efforts to reduce crime in our local areas
      3. Turn off all coverage of presidential elections – learn about and support excellent candidates for local office – learn the issues
      4. Get trained and licensed to use and carry a firearm
      5. Educate yourself about creating immunity to entrainment and mind control technology
      6. Stay coherent – develop strategies to stay coherent when those around you are not
      7. Remove from your life people who are easily manipulated and get and stay angry in response to entrainment
      8. Pray for your community
      9. Communicate with your Congressional and Senate offices that you adamantly oppose gun control and militarization of the police.
      10. Lobby your mayor and sheriff to remove federal enforcement funds from your area; stop accepting them and being subjected to the related invasion of local authorities
      11. Stop asset forfeiture in your area, including federal adoptions

      1. “‘124 Police Officers Were Killed In The U.S. Last Year’

        Some more facts that don’t match the hero narrative. Police deaths while on duty are on pace to be at a record low in 2016, down 60% from the peak in 1974. Gun related homicides are also trending towards the lowest levels since 1900. In 1991 there were 24,700 homicides in the U.S.

        Last year there were just over 16,000 homicides, down 35% while the population grew by 26%. The number of guns owned by American citizens has tripled since 1991.

        Does this match the anti-gun narrative of the left and the popos? Does the government want to confiscate our guns because of crime or because they are worried we will use them against a tyrannical establishment? The militarization of police forces isn’t to protect us.

        It’s to protect them from us.”
        http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-11/124-police-officers-were-killed-us-last-year

      2. “‘Don’t Just Blame the Cops: Who Is Responsible for America’s Killing Fields?’

        By John W. Whitehead
        July 11, 2016

        “I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government. For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.”—Martin Luther King Jr. …”

        https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/dont_just_blame_the_cops_who_is_responsible_for_americas_killing_fields

        1. “In researching this subject for a book, a few things have become clear. One is that unless there’s video, or multiple witnesses, there’s usually no consequence at all for police violence, not even on the civil side. The overwhelming majority of incidents simply disappear.”

          ‘In Police Violence Cases, Time Works Against Justice’ By Matt Taibbi
          http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/in-police-violence-cases-time-works-against-justice-20160713

  7. Wow!!! Thank you Catherine and Dr. Farrell
    Finally an explanation on Brexit that makes sense. Brilliantly explained. Impressive!

Comments are closed.