73 Comments

  1. One old man’s opinion…Spread truth simply and as openly as security allows. Some will fall on fertile ground.

  2. While I don’t think there is a universal answer for all to help you convey the message you need to convey to help your followers avoid wasting time or listening to the wrong sources, I do believe that you can direct them to question “what is the motivation for this person to tell me this or that”. This COVID situation has shown very intelligent people can be blindsided and corralled into believing the narrative at times for nothing more than the fact the intelligent person cannot fathom the evil or meanness which surrounds them and is trying to control/capture them. Good people generally think good about others (I am a “recovered one”, so I know). It is a hard pill to swallow to understand most, if not the majority are not looking out for your best interest (but you must focus on the good and keep faith). I have family members I’ve given the Kennedy book on Fauci who are still getting Covid shots, flu shots, and taking paxlovid when they inevitably get Covid. Bright, intelligent, good people. They obviously didn’t read the book I sent them, but I honestly think some people don’t want to know. They prefer the lie. And I suspect they think I am a bit off my rocker (but so be it). The people gravitating to your page are likely not the truly blind ones, but even the ones waking up have their own versions of comfortable truths we would like to hang on to for just a bit longer. It gets tiresome, and people get worn down fighting the fight.

    No big revelations here I know, but understand, I appreciate the work you do. I pay attention closely to motivation and yours has truly been to help people step out of this trap. And that is much appreciated and why I am here.

  5. Howdy

    I read your comment about your feelings about Wim Hof. So I got a question. When you had the opportunity to personally meet him did you share with him your long bicycle trips?

    What are the chances that Hurricane Fiona goes up the East Coast and makes a hard left turn (ala Hurricane Sandy) into Washington DC this weekend?

  6. When I am deciding if I should spend time listening to someone’s ideas about politics, culture, money, or health, I look for the acknowledgment of God in their frame of reference. It doesn’t have to be overt but it is the only source for a compassionate and generous view of the world.
    Colossians 2:8 ESV
    See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.

  7. I second the notion of creating a Disinformation List or sorts, describing each scam and why all signs point to it being so. We’re all on a learning curve while being blasted with a firehose of information/disinformation, so it is helpful to get guidance from those who’ve been studying this longer than we have. Discernment develops over time, as critical thinking skills are honed, and one finds time to check primary sources of information. I find that vetting any new source, and giving time to only a trusted list of sources, saves time and error, but I wasn’t born knowing this. A refresher on how to discern truth might not only teach but get a most interesting discussion going amongst us.

  9. This comment is a little off topic but wanted to pass on some information I’ve found the hard way. The Health Information Exchanges (HIE) worry me a lot, as someone who’s worked in the admin end of the industry for a long time. Recently, I went to an urgent care center with an ear problem (started that day after a family member got vaccinated). One of the forms they asked me to sign was a consent to have my information go out on the HIE. I refused to sign it. The HIE is buried in all the consent HIPAA language. They refused to see me. I asked for my copay back. They saw me then. Though I had not consented to the HIE, when I visited a doctor 5 days later for the same ear issue, the nasty front desk person, staring at her computer screen said, “so you went to an urgent care 5 days ago”. No way they could’ve known that unless my information went out on the HIE, despite me refusing consent for it. A dentist office recently basically refused to see me when I refused to sign a form attesting to having seen a data privacy policy that I had not seen, and which the front desk person produced at my request, with a display of disbelief and then anger that I wouldn’t consent to a privacy policy I’d never seen. They handled their fury by making me sit in the waiting room a half hour before I finally just walked out. It seems to me that there must be $$ incentives for them to bully us into giving up our health data, and with the HIE, it seems we are giving our data to big tech and big government, no matter how they try to dress it up as “for your own good”. It’s not for my own good. I found a way to “opt out” here https://healthshareexchange.org/patient-options-opt-out-back/, for myself and anyone else interested. I also had to opt out in writing at the state level because my state has its own health information exchange, which is truly creepy. Opt outs can be found by an internet search “opt out, health information exchange”. This has all become very, very creepy, in my opinion.

    1. This is great insight. I just sent you an email for permission to use on Money & Markets and Financial Rebellion on an anonymous basis.

    2. I had the same thing happen to me. I refudpsed to sign something with a QR code and a “gene therapy” related to cancer or something similar. It was at my gynecologist (of a all places). When I refused to fill out the info or scan the QR code, the mood changed (they were quite aggressive) and they treated me like a petulant child telling me I wasted their time by not filling it out in the waiting room and it is required and Yada Yada…. I told the lady to write whatever she need to on the form but I wasn’t completing it. She then told me I was listed as noncompliant for not seeing about my lower back issues. I pondered and said “you mean the chiropractor?” She said it wasn’t her business but that is what my file said. I told her I go to the chiropractor when I need to go. It was bizarre. I was then given a bright pink paper to take with my bill. The clerk who checked me out was instantly rude. They tried to force me to go to schedule a mammogram and I said no. So I am labeled “noncompliant” now. Badge of honor I guess.

      1. Tara,

        The doctor’s offices are bullied into bullying you. I believe the “quality standard” is a mammogram every two years (though the time frame on the standard may have changed since I last saw it). If a certain percentage of the doctor’s patients get their mammogram on time, the doctor gets a financial bonus (on the taxpayer dime) and if not, the doctor gets labeled “poor quality” of care provider. Under the HITECH Act, there seems to be some sort of financial incentive for doctors to get you to buy into/sign on tech and government collecting your data. They are likely mad because your “non-compliance” might mean loss of bonus money for them. Seems to me that the “non-compliant” label gets passed from doctor to doctor through the data sharing you probably unknowingly agreed to. Thats’s my sense, is that my covid-19 vaccine refusal and refusal on mammograms ect is following me around. I never show up wearing a mask. I just get left in waiting rooms until I walk out and I get a lot of subtle attitude. I recognize the attitude because I work in the system. I know what terminal waiting room means. Anyway doctors get incentive dollars when you get a PAP smear, mammogram, take a statin drug, get your children vaccinated, take certain blood pressure drugs… thats why you get pushed to do these things. Money.

        1. Thank you for taking the time to respond. You are exactly right. Money is the root of all evil. I almost asked her if it was required because they get paid but chose to take the high road. I left and was really upset with witnessing these previously nice people turn. I understand the pressures they have whether they are willfully participating or are trapped because of loans, financial pressures, etc. I pray for them to get back to the human underneath which I know is there for some of them. Thank you for your perspective.

          After my gyno confronted me about my chiropractor visits, I did go into my insurance carrier account log in and found my “health history” designed to “make sure I address conditions and stay healthy” BS. It went back to 2008. I was astonished. I deleted it. Thank you for the link you also provided.

          1. Have to disagree with you there. The expression is that the love of money is the root of all evil. Money is a tool. It has no emotion. It is the human desire and use that adds the punch. In my experience financial greed is down the scale on the root of evil. It is the love of power and demonic pleasures that drive killing and harming that represents much of the evil in this world. Money is merely a tool used to help attract others into helping.

            Yes, beware health records.

      2. Sounds to me like a place to avoid in the future. You need to find a gynecologist you can trust.

        1. The data sharing thing started out well intentioned enough. For instance, a person discharged from a hospital on a Friday, develops problems on a Saturday morning, such as they couldn’t pick up their medications from the pharmacy because the insurance doesn’t cover it. Patient calls primary doctor who can’t help because he/she doesn’t know what happened in the hospital, and patient has to return to hospital emergency room for a new prescription and out of control blood sugar or heart rhythm. If the primary doctor has quick access to the hospital records, said doctor might be able to assist and avert a return to the hospital. What started out a well intentioned “good idea” has morphed and ballooned into something else entirely though. Tech and government collecting and controlling the data and data flow worries me and I don’t like it. One doctor might use an exaggerated diagnosis to “upcode” your visit and get a higher payment from the insurance company, but now the patient carries an inaccurate diagnosis through data sharing- this happened to me with an asthma diagnosis that follows me everywhere but I don’t have asthma. The mental health diagnoses especially are problematic in netting higher payments for providers in billing but may haunt a patient who may be unaware that a doctor used the diagnosis once, years prior. Heath care staff are not so impartial/non-judgmental as they’d have us believe.

  10. Hi Catherine,
    Thank you as always for your insights and the obvious care you have for us, your community. I have admired your way of looking at and elucidating the world for a number of years, and so whenever there is a place of cognitive dissonance between my perception of the world and yours, it’s extremely intriguing. As I was listening to your discussion of disinformation, one of those occasions arose: the strong exception you take to Matthias Desmet’s Mass Formation hypothesis. My own way of understanding the world is grounded in cultural anthropology and (rather casually) systems theory, and how he explains things makes sense to me. I have much less grounding in mind control ops though it is an area I need to better understand. I do not think these are mutually exclusive ideas. I have heard that Desmet has offered to speak publicly with you about your differences on mass formation. I believe that a truly thoughtful discussion between opposing parties is one of the best ways to shed understanding on a controversial issue. I wish very much this kind of debate had been “allowed” by those who controlled the conventional Covid narrative. Would you be open to such a discussion between yourself, the Breggins, and Desmet? I believe it would shed a lot of light on things. Certainly for me, and maybe for others as well.
    With great appreciation for your work,
    Debra

    1. I recommended to Desmet that he write a detailed response to the Breggins book review. That is the right way to do so. He declined. These things need to be put in writing. It was only clear what he was saying when he published his book.

      I need to spend my time on things that are useful for subscribers. More time on this is not productive.

      If you think mass formation is useful, I strongly recommend the following:

      Deep State Tactics Parts 1-12
      https://home.solari.com/blast-from-the-past-deep-state-tactics-101-part-1-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

      Mind Control Tactics (state with lecture of Morgan and Giordano at the end of the links)
      https://home.solari.com/blast-from-the-past-week-of-august-15-2022-mind-control-tactics/

      Control and Freedom Happen One Person at a Time
      https://home.solari.com/control-freedom-happen-one-person-at-a-time-with-ulrike-granogger/

      You can read the more detailed analysis of Peter Breggin, CJ Hopkins and Jon Rappoport – all excellent.

      Humans do share intelligence – authors like Lynne McTaggert and Rupert Sheldrake are good sources to describe this.

      Hope that helps,

      Catherine

      1. Thanks much Catherine. I’ll followup on these resources. I had missed the fact that he had declined an offer to respond in writing. Good to know.
        Debra

      3. If the Breggins wrote an actual review of his book, perhaps Desmet would have been willing to respond. I’d characterize it as a rant, filled with false assertions, ad hominem attacks, and a failure to address Desmet’s basic message. Perhaps they didn’t understand it. I couldn’t for the life of me find the Desmet they were purportedly talking about in their “review.” And then they go on to make global accusations about how Desmet is destroying the attempt to make the whole covid debacle right, which would be true if there were any truth in their diatribe. As it turns out, they’re the ones doing what they accuse Desmet of doing, because they’re simply muddying the waters by dragging Desmet into a quagmire.

        1. What false assertions? Can you be more specific? From everything I have heard they have addressed Desmet’s basic message on numerous occasions. I would say they are more concerned regarding its conversion into psychosis by Dr. Malone.
          Have you read his book carefully? I have. Ulrike wrote a review here. Perhaps that would help. https://home.solari.com/book-review-the-psychology-of-totalitarianism-by-mattias-desmet/
          CJ Hopkins at Consent Factory and Jon Rappoport at No More Fake News have both written new recent pieces on mass formation which I recommend to you.
          It would appear to me that Desmet has a history of misleading statements and material omissions. If a case with that pattern, increasingly hard to take what he says as firm. That is why I prefer to work with his written material – its in black and white.
          The important issue here is not mass formation, it is the weaponization of mental health. This is a much bigger issue problem, which goes way beyond this discussion. Billions being thrown into it. So for me important not to get bogged down in this one aspect but step back and see how we are going to protect ourselves and our loved ones from it and turn it around. The Breggins offer priceless input and support. I am quite grateful for their efforts.

          1. I don’t see any way that professor Desmet’s assertions could be used to weaponize mental health.
            False assertions:1) that there is no conspiracy – he leaves no question that there is an elite that planned this beforehand and continued to use propaganda to brainwash people into accepting the rollout.
            2)That it’s the victims blaming themselves –this is totally baseless. He’s simply explaining how the elites used brainwashing (and the necessary conditions in order for it to be possible) to effectively get the masses to accept the mandates without questioning them.
            3)Just wait it out, see how it goes – he never stops talking about the need to stand up, to continue, at whatever cost, to speak out and challenge the narrative of the elites.
            4)That the elites are not really responsible, that there’s no conspiracy – this is a tricky one. The elites are in charge, they are pulling it off, but it’s important to see that each of us shares a responsibility for the elites to be in power in the first place – we go to their stores, we use their banks, etc. – the crucial thing to see is that if we just destroy the elites, we will simply put in place another one as long as we believe there’s a scientific, rationalist answer for everything – there isn’t – Science has become the new God, that is the problem.
            The real problem: it’s not the line between good and evil. The problem is a worldview, an ideology that thinks we are capable of controlling life. He gives the historical background as to how this came into place. It makes sense to me. The new science, which has forfeited the foundational principles of science, questioning, uncertainty, admitting that we don’t know. Fauci is an example of the new science. We are not to question it/him. He’s one of the new gods.
            I didn’t look at Rappaport’s piece. But Hopkins essentially made a joke out of it, and his piece is a joke. He didn’t even try. He made it all about Hypnosis, and it has nothing to do with Hypnosis.

          2. CJ’s two pieces on Mattis Desmet are quite insightful and not a joke at all. He is quite serious. What he points out is important. The statements of a person with a history of lying about important issues should not be taken seriously.

            Suggest you read Desmet’s book. He attributes the primary driver of the latest round of tyranny to the general population for what has happened, rather than the people who engineered this.

            This is a genocide. IMO, this took a lot of work. A lot of planning and was totally engineered. To say that the people being killed have psychological problem – let alone that is causing this I would describe as “a tad misleading.”

            When the Bolsheviks and Stalin genocided 80MM Russian, no one attributed it to hysteria. I attribute it to Wall Street. Although I would note, the next time someone comes to kill you, your family and your neighbors, you might take offense too. But I would not describe that as mass hysteria or a formation. I would describe that as people not wanting to die who get angry at the people killing them. Quite healthy survival instinct, don’t you think?

            🙂

  11. Thanks Catherine. Most comprehensive.

    If anyone has good information/insight which they don’t want to broadcast along with their name, is there a recommended channel of communication into you and your team ?

  12. Very helpful – thank you. At minute 19 you make mention of further resources look into regarding mind control. I’ve been searching here and there on Solari – and try as I may I am unable to locate the mind control and military info by Giradono & Morgan,
    Lori

  13. Catherine,
    1) My former church building was sold a few weeks ago to a new faith group. I spoke with the President of their church council numerous times about continuing to use the building so that I could continue to homeschool there. He was in complete agreement. We agreed that I would put my stuff in a pile, mark it clearly, and all would be well. I found out a week later that, unbeknownst to him, the clean-up crew came in and threw out all my stuff out.
    The lesson here is: not matter how clearly we can communicate something, our communications still have to be interpreted by someone else. You can’t be held responsible for how someone interprets (or not!) the information you give.

    2) Another though came to me last night about Plato’s Cave. We seem to think that all we need to do is leave the cave ONCE, and all is well after that. I think this is an error. I think that ASPECTS of us leave the cave, but we always leave parts of us behind. The great challenge of spiritual integration is realising that parts of us are still fixated on the shadows AND other parts of us have re-entered the cave (at our own peril) to illuminate our other shackles to ourselves. Maybe that’s too brainiac, but thinking of it that way helps me realise that life is an ongoing process, that is, necessarily, impossible to complete.

  14. Great quote from Walt Whitman, Catherine – that is how I’ve been “filtering” through information. I’m a person with a strong “gut” reaction to information. I’ve been using that to steer away from the fear porn & to be more in protection mode for my family. Also focusing on the “White Pill” hopeful problem solving action side.

  15. where are the asian elders when you need them!!

    two other forms of disinfo are the survivalist consumer and the secret potion / diet / ingredient to solve an ailment / condition etc.

    both unhealthy extremes of important topics.

    survivalist consumerism turns disaster prep into a lifestyle full of the next thing to buy.

    x is the next miracle food / pill / diet turns good food + nutrition into a novelty. this new herb from amazon works miracles. this diet, this food combo, this pill / powder etc.

    both can be marketing by someone with a product to sell. the products are different but prey on the same basic instincts of people as the other scams － insecurity / fear and the desire for a simple solution to a complex problen.

    1. Thank you for pointing out the survivalist meme. Buying food prep buckets was suggested to me with the-end-is-coming mindset. I do not care the focus of that way of seeing the world; it takes you away from the true issues of life. I almost did buy the product but realized I’ve developed my relations with the local farming community where I buy all my food. So that’s my fall back.

  17. What comes to my mind is something along the lines of your unanswered questions, a topic that you regularly come back to in the wrap-ups. (By the way, the fact that you talked about what isn’t answered is something that endeared me to your work because no one has all the answers.)

    So maybe a list of disinformation that is currently going. Or perhaps a deeper breakdown of the examples you gave here, and specifically what red flags you saw in them that told you they were disinformation. Teaching people how to be better at spotting as such, because it is not always easy.

  18. I haven’t missed a Money & Markets since the beginning. The most valuable #1 lesson is “follow the $” along with vetting. Listening to all your material and partners like Dr. Farrell and Jon Rappaport saved my life since I lost everything (homes, investments, health etc.) to deep state tactics and divorce fraud in 2000. When your ex is the CEO of a company that provided software security to the White House and all federal departments but served by the SDNY a year prior for illegally running a fraudulent “cabal” relative to an IPO your reality is shattered. Being a successful businesswoman and good Catholic girl from Buffalo I’m glad I am alive, happily remarried over 20 years now living back home in Western NY which is as far away from technocracy as I could get. Your advice helped me make that move after 34 years in Mill Valley, CA in 2018. I also believe your focus on culture, nature and reconnecting with spirituality helped me. I answer to God, the divine. Solari is like a university you can trust. I know you are humble but you and your team haven’t been wrong once. Thanks.

    1. High praise from you, Sandra. Thank you very much. There is so much intelligence in this network – we can steadily and slowly help each other create the power and endurance to turtle through this. Never know what is possible until you try.

  19. Maybe we need a Ray Dalio style “dot collector” on smaller subjects and on individuals that we can vote on?

  20. The trouble with identifying disinfo, is it is usually wrapped around kernels of truth. And, at least for me, my experience and what I would have called expertise two years ago, is wholly inadequate. My confidence in figuring things out is shaken. I am way out of my depth in economic matters and have erred on the side of being cautiously conservative with where I parked my investments. And then I learn BlackRock manages the TSP… which was never disclosed as far as I know. I’m alarmed by both the potential loss of those funds or them being used against us if I leave them there and being unable to extract them without an outrageous penalty that still aids those who continue to build the control grid. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t. I have only a couple family members who will even entertain discussion about how bad things may be and what we should change and do differently is elusive -except for holding and living into out values. No one from work or my neighborhood is open to discuss… have been largely isolated working from home for 2+ years. I know for certain I am reliant on other experts for determining how to map my course. How do I vet them, and even you as well, without sifting through the disinfo as well? How can we collaborate on vetting, reliable sources, and actionable intelligence? I have more questions than answers, but maybe I have puzzle pieces others may need? How would I contribute them? Maybe we could post our key intelligence questions and try to answer those where we have experience or expertise??

  21. Disinformation vs. Actionable Intellegence
    I like your summation. You are human and you exhort us to live to our full human potential. Question everything everyone and all sources. I am always disappointed if someone takes what I say at face value. I like to preface it with- I am researching and learning and what I am telling you now may not add up. Let’s work together to seek, find and apply TRUTH in action steps.
    These are conversations we have with trusted allies- plus we have lots of cocktail party conversation fodder as well.
    I made a small sign I have taped to my computer monitor- “We must keep coherence.” Thanks to you mentioning that- it inspires me each day to think and to do the things in the world that lead to more truth, more love and to “self care while caring for others”.

  22. Really Catherine, I have been thinking for hours to come up with some reasonable answers to your query. I don’t think many people are aware there are two fields we humans can resonate with. A technological resurected field and a natural field that is of the earth that protects and nurtures us.

    That technological field promotes your feelings on concepts. You have to have deep feelings about poverty, health ect. When we see a poverty stricken person, society walks by, when in an astma attack during a pandemic, society demands a mask ect. Judicial multi-nationals are endowed with personhood, humans are devorced from personhood. In other words, it’s function is to be anti-human!

    The natural field of the earth does the opposite. One cares directly for the poor person and or sick person. You are directly tied to the problem at hand, not the collector of the collection box and or the receiver thereof!

    Insted of drowning in feelings try to feel the differences between being bound with earth’s natural field versus the technological field.

    Then do the most important, make your choice.

    Solari offers a buffet of ways to go the natural way of things. And yes, it is an ardues road with many ways to get there but I believe it is worth it.

    1. Yes, me too. The more of us to help each other, the easier and most deeply satisfying the path. Just had coffee with two very wise people. So great.

      1. Catherine, thank you for sharing your experiences, as always. You are a great teacher.

        Might you consider Andrew Call’s suggestion of learning about Russel Jay Gould and making him HERO OF THE WEEK to help bring him to further attention? His story is truly remarkable.

        By the way, Clif High holds you in high esteem and develops your “cash” plan on his recent post, “Be Uprising.” He’s just such a character.

        1. Hi Caroline,

          I did listen to Andrew Call’s youtube link from Russel Jay Gould. What I perceive from the Western world today (US + EU) is total lawlessness. I don’t think rearanging sentences, and putting quantum before grammar, is going to change that unfolding lawlessness.

          When bullets fly, dodging might be more effective. Quantum grammar sounds like re-arranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic.

          1. LOL
            I do agree that understanding the legal system is quite helpful. But I have never known the leadership to respect any legal system at the end of the day.

          2. The Titanic, indeed. Yes, Alexandra, I certainly agree. I found his story useful simply to learn how the legal system worked. And then to learn that this man figured out that the country was going into bankruptcy in 1999 and that a president would not be elected on Election Day. That he figured out the grammar code and afterwards put it to the real life test to see how it worked at such great cost to himself; the enormous effort and courage. But, of course, you are correct. It is senseless to think we can do anything about it. It is not actionable at all. I thought it was just such a historic story that everyone should, at least, come to know.

          3. Just as Catherine said that all the ‘elites’ know that the prosperity comes from the equity that comes from Life, and that money is simply an exchange format that can be pronted….. And many stories of people being bluntly honest when it comes down to the core of a topic (reference: when Catherine gave a speech and the investor said “they’re pulling the money out starting in the fall..” a blunt, honest, matter-of-fact statement…) ….. The personal experiences of judges and police respecting honesty, forthrightness, correctness, self-respect, due diligence, etc..
            That there are enough people on planet, with enough of a spark of goodness in them, to build a bunch of personal lifeboats ripped from the boards of the titanic even as it does a slow controlled sink, even if insane people with coats are running around with syringes, or silent mercs pointing scalar beamweapons from a distance, that we can work together to build our own vessels that can navigate correctly, and at some point cooperate to build a better designed large boat we can collectively stand on, dock to, even if using scraps salvaged from the sinking, doomed, “Titanic.”
            That this takes oodles of resiliency, discipline, courage, education, self will, positive attitude, self responsibility, cooperation, and persistence. That it can be done.

            Maybe there’s things I don’t onow about the control grid and how hard it hits. But, maybe those people don’t know what it is like to have a living connection to Source, to God, to Allah, to the Creator, and don’t know how many fail safe systems God programmed into the Planetary, Solar, Galactic, Metagalactic, Cosmayic grids, chakras, crystal seals, and all the other spiritual anatomies.

            “They” just don’t have access to all the information. Not to argue. It’s just simply, if God will allow the ship to sink, and free will that everyone can make choices to sink or swim, and that those honestly making efforts and being forthright will be navigated out of the mess, to eventual safety…
            And assuming someone who is making the choice to live, to be good, great,…. When is a good time to take responsibility for one’s ability to navigate? The soul goes through stargates either way at some points, with or without the body.
            I’m not perfect, and maybe I’m just shifting a chair around here, but I was inspired to type. Thank you.

        2. Caroline, thank you for the support on that. The videos, there are 10 parts to tgat documentary, however every one has vital informationm. Most I have shared with stop at 2 or 3, right before the specifics of dates and mechanics of financial trusts is explained.

          There is something called a Claim of the Life. This is a claim that positions oneself as a fact outside the fraudulent-grammar void:birth-certificate, and creates a position upon which other claims can be made. The interesting thing here is that there are specific, actionable steps for any citizen to take, to claim control of their usuries.

          Such as having a bank account but becoming the postmaster of the contract of usury(terms and conditions). There is an absolutrly brilliant explanation, briefly stated by a Canadian, :Gordon-Michael: Schiller. Link below.
          https://youtu.be/VEU8Ll-4C7U

          1. Hi Andrew,

            I did not mean any disrespect. I am a very down to earth person. I believe God’s earth is most beautifull and I like planting my feet firmly on terra firma. People get so invested in “mental constructs” and fight tooth and nail for it. It simply baffles me, nothing more, nothing less motivated me to write my little piece.

  23. Oh and, the timelines of how the US corporate charter for the bankruptcy since 1775, ending 3rd moratorium in 1999, coincides very closely to when Mr. Global started to decide to siphon it out the back door…. Because there is no longer any continuance for the termsvof the bankruptcy charter, no terms to elect a CEO on the financial trust(president USA), no terms for postal mechanics(shipment of goods, services, vessels=contracts)… Therefore this “wild west” type environment.

  24. Thank you for this, the keywords sparked knowing for Me here. The vivid detailed description of the control grid makes seeing it easier, many types of sight.
    The way you characterize situations and label them make it easy to filter and file my own life events better.

    On a separate topic. Catherine, Have you looked at the work put out by :Russell-Jay: Gould? Look at lastflagstanding.com and :War-Castles. Channel on youtube. This has been hands down the most advanced and thorough, in depth explanation, of postal mechanics, maritime shipping, civil procedure (courts), international treaty and trust law, grammar on contract, actually correct history of the (former) United States…. I think it’d be great for you two to do an interview.

    Canada was in international bankruptcy and fame out of it in 2017? I think. The implicationsvare massive for how the structures of the control grid is set up, from nativity.

    I will post a link directly for people to listen and discern for themselves:

    https://youtu.be/u5HrrGUQeUQ

    1. I’ve wondered about him too. He seems to have a third parallel universe of sorts, although I’m not sure how becoming part of such (that is, state national) fixes the national/global monetary issues?

    2. Dear Andrew, thank you for your posting. I’ve known about the Strawman for a number of years but without a deep understanding of diagramming sentences, it’s difficult to get a handle on it. And as Russell recounts, it takes superhuman courage to challenge our birth certificate and regain sovereignty as an individual. To learn from Russell that in 1999, when the US loan to the international bankers came due again at the 70-year mark, and the US went bankrupt, making our birth certificates void, albeit for only a short period, we had the chance to CLAIM OUR SOVEREINGTY, is astounding. What a missed opportunity due to our naive ignorance and bad education! If you haven’t already seen my earlier post, I recommend Clif High’s walkthrough of the history of US LAW and the US debt at https://www.bitchute.com/video/nTuQoDQt23hf/ It presents another piece of this puzzle.

      1. This first video was Russell’s own battle with the system.

        In this next video, we learn from Russell’s in-depth study on banking, postal, military and court mechanics on why it works the way it works, the structure, how the structure worked, and then how to build it back together through CORRECT GRAMMAR to give fairness to all people on the planet.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpFzt77huxc/watch?v=fpFzt77huxc

        10:29) We learn that Ben Franklin was a French lawyer working for the British Crown to capture the United States of America. [I imagine the mind, without film, radio, and television, allowed lawyers (masters in the study of language) to concoct all sorts of secret codes with language.]

        Russell figured out that the POST OFFICE (Ben Franklin first US Postmaster General) was the central control to authorize the corporate structures of government, and the FLAG was the foundation of the construct of contracts.

        And when he discovered that the US was going bankrupt in 1999, he went into action to safeguard the Constitution and the Flag. In November 1999, when there was a debate about who won the election, leaving the country “without a country,” Russell was prepared.

        What a fascinating story!

  25. I really appreciate this look at the past.

    I worry that a non-trivial part of the problem is that for many people information is still very tribal. Because someone claims to want the same things of us it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking they’re a friend and can be trusted. The biggest trouble is that as you point out even competent & trustworthy people can be mislead.

    There’s another “please don’t fight” dynamic, where people want to see all the people they listen to “get along”. Not only that but they also interpret disagreement over a topic as an outright attack. I think it is important for people to de-personalize information as much as possible.

    I think an emphasis on ‘red lines’ is important.
    Establishing guard rails can be useful. Things like: “Nobody is coming to save us, we have to do it ourselves” can filter a great deal of hope porn. Another example of a “red line” would be how you insist we need to prevent an “all digital financial system”, this itself forces people into a frame where they have to re-evaluate various options.

    1. The “please don’t fight dynamic“ rang a bell. I was in a discussion with several people last week about transgender ideology. And one person said that it is important for us to understand transgender and make them comfortable and get along with them.

      I had previously spoken out with emphasis on how dangerous it is to individuals, especially children, as well as society and this is the response elicited.

      1. I can certainly imagine, Richard, growing up as a young person being a girl wanting to be a boy, as I was a tomboy. But I never connected it to my genitals! and I had brothers. One can be girlish or boyish without going to such extremes, one would think.

        1. I’ve been putting together my thoughts on the gender issue since that discussion. I append some of them here though it be longer than I like for a discussion board.

          Homosexual and Transgender Ideologies

          I. Sex biology is innate and purposeful. It cannot be changed by ideological allegiance and medical science. A man cannot become a woman and a woman cannot become a man. Union of man with man and woman with woman can never equal the effectiveness of heterosexual marriage.

          A. “The male and female derivations of human gender are truly equal but differential—hence complemental—to one another by creative design…. We are created equal in spirit and aspiration; but always will we be separated by biology and mind.

          B. “The supreme dependence of men and women on shared co-operation is divinely intended to greatly enhance their mutual potentials for social, intellectual, emotional, and spiritual growth.”

          C. “In its full and essential nature, humankind is dually differentiated according to function, awareness, and behavior response. Male and female are perfectly equal in mind endowment and spiritual status, but they remain individually supreme in their own personal domains of activity as these are “determined by biologic differentiation and by mental dissimilarity” [UB 84:5:13 (938:3)]. Practically regarded, men and women are representative of “two distinct varieties of the same species living in close and intimate association” [UB 84:6:3 (938:7)].

          II. Sociology of sexual identity
          A. Family depends on male-female parents which provides social stability for society. Civilization depends on the family unit.
          B. Homosexuality and transgender identification are less than ideal for individuals and society.

          After discussing the spiritual and material causes of these ideologies becoming widespread I conclude:

          IV. The conclusion of this presentation on sexual identity is that the perpetrators of this fraud against humanity must be opposed. And that takes courage in the face of woke fundamentalism. One must be willing to lose esteem, rewards, money, physical freedom, and even life for the sake of the truth. While short-term expediency may make life easier, it will not go well for the soul.

          If you have made it this far in a too long comment, I hope it has been worthwhile Caroline.

          1. Well, Richard, I appreciate that you have given this issue considerable thought. From what I’ve learned, homosexuals and transgenders have been around for a very long time.

            Although I’ve never discussed this with gay friends growing up, I finally came to think that homosexuality is the result of abuse as a child, even if not remembered. For men, I think, it is an imprinting mechanism that harkens back to the body’s involuntary response to their “first experience.” For women, I tend to think it is a reactionary response to the violent penetration of their body, quite different to a man’s.

            And then think of the eunichs in the courts of emperors who were “transgendered.” Today, it appears, transgendered people are being made to emulate the baphomet, as well as to contribute to the sterility agenda. We are blessed to appreciate who we are and to feel “at home” in our God-given, natural bodies.

    2. Gabriel, good points. Thinking about the efficacy of time spent on “prevention,” Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD both write of a co-existent “breakaway culture.” Yet we are given no instruction/background on how they managed to survive and thrive. I have to wonder how people survive wars when so many die.

  26. I needed to hear this! Some of us have the need of wanting to be on a winning team, battling the “evil cabal” and getting our country, community, etc. back to the Constitution. It’s exactly like you say, they have “military-grade, mind control technology.” I confess that I have been lazy and didn’t perform due dilliegence and often may follow a crowd. Perhaps, we need a category called “Dumpster” with titles of Disinformation topics we agree on, (and we use it to help others in the process). Thank you!

  27. You might not be surprised to hear my suggestion, but … it is a matter of education in combination with wanting to be a responsible adult in difficult times. Most of us have been raised in the mind-controlled capitalistic world where you constantly look for opportunity. However, we need to realize that the system is rigged, every opportunity for you comes at a price to others. A lot of the disinformation plays into this conditioning – take the vaccine and YOU will be safe, invest in this and YOU will be rich. We obviously need to navigate our way in difficult times, but we really need to commit to the lollypop-index and figure out which investment of time and money delivers BOTH objectives: personal safety and an improving lollypop-index. A strong focus on these will, i believe, automatically condition us to see through 95% of disinformation. The remaining 5%, we need to keep each other sharp :-).

  28. Sounded as if there are two separate arenas in your problem. One is on financial matters directly I.e. trustworthy investments. The other i.e. Greg Hunter, the dollar collapse is more of an effort to determine an end point to the madness. Your experience does give people confidence and your insights valuable. Never invest, but just as vetting sources for investing seems more than reasonable, advice on signposts that are most important to watch for would be best for the madness watchers. (Watch Greg regularly).Marie.

    1. Love Greg to pieces. Lots of great things to learn from him. We maintain a New Media list that we publish in the News Trends and Stories section of the recent Wrap Up. These are people we admire, work with, support. USA Watch Dog is on the list!

Comments are closed.