84 Comments

1. I love the discussion about living in the intersection of official reality vs reality. I have lived in this zone and managed to survived, though, what I call “the soul of money” channels, can be tricky to navigate.
   Please keep up the discussion and unpacking of this very relevant territory.

2. On TV in the Twilight Zone of Sweden this week, there was an uncritical interview with a university professor extolling cannibalism for a climate conscious world. It was shown on the main private broadcaster (Swedish) Channel 4. Their parent company even owns a surprising number of US lifestyle magazines. Perhaps the purpose of this was just to scare people? At least the more careless controlled media gets, the more people will see that they are a parody of themselves.

   1. Many purposes:

      If you want to accomplish an outrageous policy that is bad for people you have people promote the much more outrageous so you can then broker the reasonable compromise. So if I want to move the age of consensual sex younger and consensual surgery to 16 – I have a group of progressives promote lower the voting age to 8. Then we compromise at 16 – then I have them at that age for consensual sex, draft and surgery – I slip it in – Now I can massively entrain the 16 year olds and dramatically increase sex slavery and lots of human experimentation. The people who were fighting the 8 year old age will be beaten down and go along thinking they won an improvement.

      Assume this is part of the push to get people to eat GMO soy burgers and insects for very big profits.

      1. Thank you for your very clear explanation. The poor sales of insect based foods was mentioned in the interview. The move away from ruminants and dairy in the Swedish diet makes little sense in terms of ecology as cows are required access to pasture in the summer and open pasture is some of the most biodiverse land Sweden has. As small dairy farms go out of business, the land is sold off cheap and often becomes a “forest” i.e. tree plantations.

         1. Cows = fertilizer manufacturers. The whole playbook is designed to generate increased corporate profits with fake food and put small farmers out of business.

      2. http://www.labelourbeef.com/?fbclid=IwAR029W-AK2zkYq9SyhDDvZBYg-mLnQh0Zq3gDHd9cN3EEmeNywjkYSHt_4c. In 2015 Congress voted to end the requirement that meat labels have to tell us where the meat is from. Americans can no longer choose to buy American beef or pork unless country-of-origin labeling (COOL) is restored. Hundreds of millions of pounds of imported beef is being mislabeled as “Products of the USA”. The United States economy suffers a $13.6 billion annual loss to its largest sector of American agriculture: cattle. This is our national grassroots campaign to raise awareness for executive action to bring back mandatory COOL for beef in order to support America’s cattle farmers and rancher. I support this initiative and I wanted to pass it on.

         1. Will post. Thanks. My concern is that removing labeling requirements increase the chances of poor quality meat but of fake meat, diseased meat or worse.

            1. I can understand this is a video from a Wyoming rancher concerning the issues of labeling beef. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzLjVS9SscA Wyoming Life

            2. EXCELLENT! Will post

3. On TV in the Twilight Zone of Sweden this week, there was an uncritical interview with a university professor extolling cannibalism for a climate conscious world. It was shown on the main private broadcaster (Swedish) Channel 4. Their parent company even owns a surprising number of US lifestyle magazines. Perhaps the purpose of this was just to scare people? At least the more careless controlled media gets, the more people will see that they are a parody of themselves.

   1. Many purposes:

      If you want to accomplish an outrageous policy that is bad for people you have people promote the much more outrageous so you can then broker the reasonable compromise. So if I want to move the age of consensual sex younger and consensual surgery to 16 – I have a group of progressives promote lower the voting age to 8. Then we compromise at 16 – then I have them at that age for consensual sex, draft and surgery – I slip it in – Now I can massively entrain the 16 year olds and dramatically increase sex slavery and lots of human experimentation. The people who were fighting the 8 year old age will be beaten down and go along thinking they won an improvement.

      Assume this is part of the push to get people to eat GMO soy burgers and insects for very big profits.

      1. Thank you for your very clear explanation. The poor sales of insect based foods was mentioned in the interview. The move away from ruminants and dairy in the Swedish diet makes little sense in terms of ecology as cows are required access to pasture in the summer and open pasture is some of the most biodiverse land Sweden has. As small dairy farms go out of business, the land is sold off cheap and often becomes a “forest” i.e. tree plantations.

         1. Cows = fertilizer manufacturers. The whole playbook is designed to generate increased corporate profits with fake food and put small farmers out of business.

      2. http://www.labelourbeef.com/?fbclid=IwAR029W-AK2zkYq9SyhDDvZBYg-mLnQh0Zq3gDHd9cN3EEmeNywjkYSHt_4c. In 2015 Congress voted to end the requirement that meat labels have to tell us where the meat is from. Americans can no longer choose to buy American beef or pork unless country-of-origin labeling (COOL) is restored. Hundreds of millions of pounds of imported beef is being mislabeled as “Products of the USA”. The United States economy suffers a $13.6 billion annual loss to its largest sector of American agriculture: cattle. This is our national grassroots campaign to raise awareness for executive action to bring back mandatory COOL for beef in order to support America’s cattle farmers and rancher. I support this initiative and I wanted to pass it on.

         1. Will post. Thanks. My concern is that removing labeling requirements increase the chances of poor quality meat but of fake meat, diseased meat or worse.

            1. I can understand this is a video from a Wyoming rancher concerning the issues of labeling beef. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzLjVS9SscA Wyoming Life

            2. EXCELLENT! Will post

4. Hi Catherine,

   You had mentioned while you traveled across parts of Canada that Tim Horton’s was only offering Beyond Meat hamburgers and sausages. I was shocked to learn this. Even though I’m a strict vegetarian, I would *not* recommend eating those, especially regularly. Though I have not eaten at a Tim Horton’s, I believe that they haven’t offered hamburgers since the 1960s, before it became a nationwide chain, focusing on coffee and doughnuts instead:
   https://mentalfloss.com/article/58587/tim-horton-originally-sold-hamburgers .

   When Canadians think of Tim Horton’s they don’t equate hamburgers with it. It appears the Beyond Meat options are merely side options, though dangerous and unhealthy ones. I wonder if the change was influenced by Burger King’s acquisition of the Canadian chain, especially since Burger King has offered the “Impossible Burger,” which is a meatless burger that is currently more expensive than Beyond Meat.

   https://www.bk.com/menu-item/impossible-whopper

   1. I looked at the marketing boards in app 20 Tim Hortons going east and then back west. Did not look like a sideline to me. Beyond Burger and Beyond Sausage were major offerings. You should go look. I was there to get coffee and tea.

      1. I’ve gone into a couple of Tim Hortons and yes, the Beyond Meat and Beyond Sausage sandwiches were one the first menu board on the left, along with turkey sandwiches and other sandwiches and wraps. I did notice that there were regular sausage options as well among their breakfast options in the middle of the menu board.

         After asking a few Canadians who have lived in Canada all of their lives, they said that when they think of Tim Hortons they first think of doughnuts, doughnut holes/”Timbits”, and coffee. Then, they think of breakfast foods. None of them thought of hamburgers, as that previous article mentioned that Tim Hortons tried selling burgers in the early 60s, failed, and consequently switched over to coffee and doughnuts.

         Anyway, why Tim Hortons is introducing Beyond Meat products instead of beef products is an interesting question… veganism and vegetarianism continues to be trendy, so perhaps that’s a part of it, and this may be related to trying to “slow down climate change,” which you have discussed is suspect to being an excuse to mind control people and have them eat “food-like products.”

         1. My guess from listening to the investment presentations – a very big top down push across the board to make GMO soy meat fashionable to dramatically protect food company profits. Major corporate move.

            1. That’s sad. I recommend this book, which gives a good account of the hazards of eating too much soy, including how soy has been overused in the West and how soy has historically been used in Asia. Organic, fermented whole soy items can be quite healthy, actually. Others, not so much:

               http://drkaayladaniel.com/summing-up-the-whole-soy-story-the-dark-side-of-americas-favorite-health-food/

               Thanks for the insight!

5. Hi Catherine,

   You had mentioned while you traveled across parts of Canada that Tim Horton’s was only offering Beyond Meat hamburgers and sausages. I was shocked to learn this. Even though I’m a strict vegetarian, I would *not* recommend eating those, especially regularly. Though I have not eaten at a Tim Horton’s, I believe that they haven’t offered hamburgers since the 1960s, before it became a nationwide chain, focusing on coffee and doughnuts instead:
   https://mentalfloss.com/article/58587/tim-horton-originally-sold-hamburgers .

   When Canadians think of Tim Horton’s they don’t equate hamburgers with it. It appears the Beyond Meat options are merely side options, though dangerous and unhealthy ones. I wonder if the change was influenced by Burger King’s acquisition of the Canadian chain, especially since Burger King has offered the “Impossible Burger,” which is a meatless burger that is currently more expensive than Beyond Meat.

   https://www.bk.com/menu-item/impossible-whopper

   1. I looked at the marketing boards in app 20 Tim Hortons going east and then back west. Did not look like a sideline to me. Beyond Burger and Beyond Sausage were major offerings. You should go look. I was there to get coffee and tea.

      1. I’ve gone into a couple of Tim Hortons and yes, the Beyond Meat and Beyond Sausage sandwiches were one the first menu board on the left, along with turkey sandwiches and other sandwiches and wraps. I did notice that there were regular sausage options as well among their breakfast options in the middle of the menu board.

         After asking a few Canadians who have lived in Canada all of their lives, they said that when they think of Tim Hortons they first think of doughnuts, doughnut holes/”Timbits”, and coffee. Then, they think of breakfast foods. None of them thought of hamburgers, as that previous article mentioned that Tim Hortons tried selling burgers in the early 60s, failed, and consequently switched over to coffee and doughnuts.

         Anyway, why Tim Hortons is introducing Beyond Meat products instead of beef products is an interesting question… veganism and vegetarianism continues to be trendy, so perhaps that’s a part of it, and this may be related to trying to “slow down climate change,” which you have discussed is suspect to being an excuse to mind control people and have them eat “food-like products.”

         1. My guess from listening to the investment presentations – a very big top down push across the board to make GMO soy meat fashionable to dramatically protect food company profits. Major corporate move.

            1. That’s sad. I recommend this book, which gives a good account of the hazards of eating too much soy, including how soy has been overused in the West and how soy has historically been used in Asia. Organic, fermented whole soy items can be quite healthy, actually. Others, not so much:

               http://drkaayladaniel.com/summing-up-the-whole-soy-story-the-dark-side-of-americas-favorite-health-food/

               Thanks for the insight!

6. Hello Catherine,

   This is regarding Pamela Anderson, person of the week.

   *I have not watched The View episode, I despise that show. Laughing Aloud!

   It is my opinion that Pamela Anderson is a prime candidate to have been a Mind-Controlled Sex Slave. This is based on her claimed childhood and known rise through the stardom ranks.

   From Wikipedia:
   “Anderson claims she suffered sexual abuse as a child, a fact she revealed publicly in 2014. She said she was molested by a female babysitter from ages 6 to 10, raped by a 25-year-old man when she was age 12, and gang-raped by her boyfriend and six of his friends when she was 14.”

   From what I know of Trauma-Based (likely Multiple Personality Disorder) Mind Control, the above claim is typical.

   As a mid-30s male who was 11-12 years old during the internet goin mainstream, Pamela Anderson was a major figure in the sexual development of an entire generation. She was obviously used for this purpose. She was likely the most searched ‘nude, xxx, celebrity’ on the revolutionary internet. She was part of the pornography entrainment that has destroyed much of our 30 year old males. See Tommy Lee Jones.

   So that leaves a few possibilities as to her current change of tune regarding Julian Assange.

   1. Perhaps she broke her mind control. You know better than I how likely that is.

   2. Maybe she has Multiple Personality Disorder and this is her honest one.

   3. She is part of Management of Perception entertainment/intelligence operations.

   4. Perhaps she chose her sexual icon path herself, is not an intelligence asset, is in full control of her actions, and stands up for the little man vis a vis Julian Assange support.

   There are a few others.

   To me, #3 is the most likely and scares me the most. This could imply that Julian Assange is also Management of Perception and is an intelligence asset.

   What do you think is her motivation?

   Thanks for Reading.

   1. For accuracy, I believe the video was of Tommy Lee, drummer for Motley Crue, while Tommy Lee Jones is a legitimate actor.

      1. But does Tommy Lee Jones get any points for having Al Gore has a roommate in College?

         1. He’s got Al Gore Rhythm!

            1. John, Al & Tipper are big Bob Dylan fans as they can recite most of his songs from memory.

      2. Absolutely correct. Thanks for catching that.

   2. Kelly – in my experience every person in the US population is managed. We divide into two groups – those who know it and those who do not know it. In people of Pamela’s age group, the mind control programming was much more hands on. Now it is much more by electronic means. The question for each one of us is whether or not we can rise above the interference and manipulation in our lives.

      Appreciate your insight in her role on sexual development. I have traditionally avoided the whole magazine and on line sex scene I had been taught to believe it was a giant manipulation/control file trap from very early on. The whole goal of control was to make sure people could not get access to real sex unless they did what they were told. Which is amazing when you realize we should easily be able to control that kind of intimate space without third party interference.

      There has been plenty of intelligence agency manipulation in and around Assange – this is like swimming in a swimming pool with dirty water – no place to stay clean. So I have to judge people by their actions. I know how much personal physical risk she is taking and how well she has spoken out. So I judge her on our actions. She has done an excellent job of defending Assange that I saw – and I am glad she is doing.

      Is it 3 or 4? No way to know. All part of making do what we have to work with. It will be very bad for all of us if we allow Assange to be slow killed in prison. Period.

      1. Thank-you Catherine for that insightful response. I wholeheartedly agree with your points.

         Whether Assange is an intelligence asset (he is a willful participant) or independent of ABC affiliation, his detention is very symbolic. Failure to act on his behalf by the public signifies that the TRUTH is effectively laid to rest in any meaningful, large-scale way.

         Regarding sexuality, the internet and ease of access to pornography:

         The leading-edge millenials (30 year olds) were very susceptible to the rapid progress of the internet. Our parents, baby-boomers, for the most part, were very computer and digitally illiterate. Often, the pre-teens were light-years ahead of the parents in understanding computer operation, internet browsing and basic online privacy. This of course led to unrestricted porn viewing at key hormonal development stages for many vulnerable children. At the time, parents did not comprehend the severity of the situation nor how it could be stopped.

         I believe a huge portion of an entire generation of adolescents were victims of mass sexual assault. My proof?

         One of the types of sexual abuse of a child.
         From: https://www.healthyplace.com/abuse/child-abuse-information/types-child-abuse

         “Exposing children to adult sexuality – Performing sexual acts in front of a child, exposing genitals, telling “dirty” stories, showing pornography to a child.”

         This is widely accepted as a form of abuse.

         The good news regarding manipulation and the two categories people fall into, aware or not aware, is that it can be overcome.

         The crucial step is proper nutrition. Upon the advice of a purported Rothschild, I now drink only distilled water (if I can) and have ceased consuming all meat and most carbohydrates about 1.5 years ago. This was incredibly important and the benefits have played out exactly as foretold. Interestingly, this person also pointed out Catherine Austin Fitts as ‘a knowing woman’.

         The bad news, most people aren’t willing to take the plunge.

         1. What in the world is a knowing woman?

            1. Hah! ‘Knowing Woman’. Actually, I looked back. He said “a knowing human”

               A little context.

               The discussion took place in 2011. The Rothschild was fielding questions and speculations about the future; specifically the next ‘big thing’. Your name came up when describing the accuracy of your ‘slow burn’ theory.

               Here is an excerpt:

               “There is an american woman, Catherine Austin Fitts, who has described it better than most! She was a plod in the Bush administration and saw the fraud up close and personal…and was dealt with accordingly.

               She still hasn’t SHUT UP! But few listen anyway!”

               There is more if you are interested, but too much for the comment section.

            2. Thanks, Kelly. Have seen it before.

7. Hello Catherine,

   This is regarding Pamela Anderson, person of the week.

   *I have not watched The View episode, I despise that show. Laughing Aloud!

   It is my opinion that Pamela Anderson is a prime candidate to have been a Mind-Controlled Sex Slave. This is based on her claimed childhood and known rise through the stardom ranks.

   From Wikipedia:
   “Anderson claims she suffered sexual abuse as a child, a fact she revealed publicly in 2014. She said she was molested by a female babysitter from ages 6 to 10, raped by a 25-year-old man when she was age 12, and gang-raped by her boyfriend and six of his friends when she was 14.”

   From what I know of Trauma-Based (likely Multiple Personality Disorder) Mind Control, the above claim is typical.

   As a mid-30s male who was 11-12 years old during the internet goin mainstream, Pamela Anderson was a major figure in the sexual development of an entire generation. She was obviously used for this purpose. She was likely the most searched ‘nude, xxx, celebrity’ on the revolutionary internet. She was part of the pornography entrainment that has destroyed much of our 30 year old males. See Tommy Lee Jones.

   So that leaves a few possibilities as to her current change of tune regarding Julian Assange.

   1. Perhaps she broke her mind control. You know better than I how likely that is.

   2. Maybe she has Multiple Personality Disorder and this is her honest one.

   3. She is part of Management of Perception entertainment/intelligence operations.

   4. Perhaps she chose her sexual icon path herself, is not an intelligence asset, is in full control of her actions, and stands up for the little man vis a vis Julian Assange support.

   There are a few others.

   To me, #3 is the most likely and scares me the most. This could imply that Julian Assange is also Management of Perception and is an intelligence asset.

   What do you think is her motivation?

   Thanks for Reading.

   1. For accuracy, I believe the video was of Tommy Lee, drummer for Motley Crue, while Tommy Lee Jones is a legitimate actor.

      1. But does Tommy Lee Jones get any points for having Al Gore has a roommate in College?

         1. He’s got Al Gore Rhythm!

            1. John, Al & Tipper are big Bob Dylan fans as they can recite most of his songs from memory.

      2. Absolutely correct. Thanks for catching that.

   2. Kelly – in my experience every person in the US population is managed. We divide into two groups – those who know it and those who do not know it. In people of Pamela’s age group, the mind control programming was much more hands on. Now it is much more by electronic means. The question for each one of us is whether or not we can rise above the interference and manipulation in our lives.

      Appreciate your insight in her role on sexual development. I have traditionally avoided the whole magazine and on line sex scene I had been taught to believe it was a giant manipulation/control file trap from very early on. The whole goal of control was to make sure people could not get access to real sex unless they did what they were told. Which is amazing when you realize we should easily be able to control that kind of intimate space without third party interference.

      There has been plenty of intelligence agency manipulation in and around Assange – this is like swimming in a swimming pool with dirty water – no place to stay clean. So I have to judge people by their actions. I know how much personal physical risk she is taking and how well she has spoken out. So I judge her on our actions. She has done an excellent job of defending Assange that I saw – and I am glad she is doing.

      Is it 3 or 4? No way to know. All part of making do what we have to work with. It will be very bad for all of us if we allow Assange to be slow killed in prison. Period.

      1. Thank-you Catherine for that insightful response. I wholeheartedly agree with your points.

         Whether Assange is an intelligence asset (he is a willful participant) or independent of ABC affiliation, his detention is very symbolic. Failure to act on his behalf by the public signifies that the TRUTH is effectively laid to rest in any meaningful, large-scale way.

         Regarding sexuality, the internet and ease of access to pornography:

         The leading-edge millenials (30 year olds) were very susceptible to the rapid progress of the internet. Our parents, baby-boomers, for the most part, were very computer and digitally illiterate. Often, the pre-teens were light-years ahead of the parents in understanding computer operation, internet browsing and basic online privacy. This of course led to unrestricted porn viewing at key hormonal development stages for many vulnerable children. At the time, parents did not comprehend the severity of the situation nor how it could be stopped.

         I believe a huge portion of an entire generation of adolescents were victims of mass sexual assault. My proof?

         One of the types of sexual abuse of a child.
         From: https://www.healthyplace.com/abuse/child-abuse-information/types-child-abuse

         “Exposing children to adult sexuality – Performing sexual acts in front of a child, exposing genitals, telling “dirty” stories, showing pornography to a child.”

         This is widely accepted as a form of abuse.

         The good news regarding manipulation and the two categories people fall into, aware or not aware, is that it can be overcome.

         The crucial step is proper nutrition. Upon the advice of a purported Rothschild, I now drink only distilled water (if I can) and have ceased consuming all meat and most carbohydrates about 1.5 years ago. This was incredibly important and the benefits have played out exactly as foretold. Interestingly, this person also pointed out Catherine Austin Fitts as ‘a knowing woman’.

         The bad news, most people aren’t willing to take the plunge.

         1. What in the world is a knowing woman?

            1. Hah! ‘Knowing Woman’. Actually, I looked back. He said “a knowing human”

               A little context.

               The discussion took place in 2011. The Rothschild was fielding questions and speculations about the future; specifically the next ‘big thing’. Your name came up when describing the accuracy of your ‘slow burn’ theory.

               Here is an excerpt:

               “There is an american woman, Catherine Austin Fitts, who has described it better than most! She was a plod in the Bush administration and saw the fraud up close and personal…and was dealt with accordingly.

               She still hasn’t SHUT UP! But few listen anyway!”

               There is more if you are interested, but too much for the comment section.

            2. Thanks, Kelly. Have seen it before.

Comments are closed.