54 Comments

1. Delightful to see you both together for the first quarter wrap up.
   I can’t help but wonder if it has come up yet as to why they initial naso-pharyngeal (deep) PCR testing is a different diagnostic test than the anterior nares (inside nostril) When this first started and I was having lengthy conversations with my patients, while they were waiting to be taken in for their surgical procedure. For example, the teachers would have to test weekly in order to attend work. They would report loss of taste and smell after the testing. The olfactory (sense of smell) nerves enter the brain at cribiform plate (thin bone). They reported pain, eyes watering and extreme discomfort. Of course this would be the case. Did nerve damage from the blunt dissection (trauma) from swabbing the area in a circular fashion? One must wonder why they needed to be so close to the brain. There were anterior and deep swabs available the entire time. If one would insist, they were able to get the less invasive one. I worked in ENT surgery for many years. The doctors did surgery under direct visualization (with a scope and camera) I never could understand how this whole situation could take place. Mothers holding their children down ect. In addition, the teachers told me their swabbing would go into the same vial as five others. We know it was to drive the numbers up. I simply can not for the life of me understand how so many medical “professionals” went along with this and still do. I saw the article about the gallop pole and high levels of trust. One must wonder why. On another note, the video of the Biden on stage turning in circles and staring at the flag was interesting. I wonder if he was human or a remote controlled machine with a newbie holding the remote control.

   1. A lot of unsettling unknowns.

      I never once heard this question from anyone: if a biological pathogen was so contagious and fast-acting that it was necessary to lock down and isolate the entire world, why was it necessary to jab something so far up the nasal passage in order to get a sample?

      1. Good question. Blow your nose and swab that. Why the access so close to the brain?

      2. If this were an actual plaque there would be bodies in the streets.

2. Dear Catherine and Dr Farrell
   Thank you for this episode and ALL your hard
   work and efforts over the years.
   At times I feel very overwhelmed and fearful over the madness we face today. Tonight upon wrapping up the wrap up I feel encouraged and inspired to take more action in my family and community and within THIS community.

   Dr Farrell, as Catherine said you ARE NEEDED as a part of THIS community.

   Please keep bringing light to the darkness and to the world.
   God bless you both.

3. Dear Catherine

   It was was fascinating to listen to you and Joseph discussing prayer towards the end of this report. I am new to prayer. At your suggestions I have been saying the Deer’s Cry every day for about a year now. I was wondering if you could guide me to where can I learn more about prayer, in particular about how to pray – not WHAT to pray (I have the Solari prayer book) but HOW to pray?

   I have been thinking a lot about what Joseph said about in Part 1. Do we die because we sin or do we sin because be die?

   Joseph does not impress me as one who has truck with gender neutral pronouns so I took note when Joseph used the pronoun ‘he’ when he was talking about the Holy Spirit. I had always thought of the Holy Spirit as being ‘it’. That made me question whether the Holy Spirit is a ‘he’ or an ‘it’ but since I do not know anyone whom I can talk to about theological questions I made a search about this on the internet and I was surprised at the results it turned up. I had no idea what a deep discussion is. I love being surprised by your conversations and being led down new paths of knowledge, discovery and inspiration.

   Will transcripts become available of the Wrap-ups?

   1. I am also on a learning curve (BTW thanks to Catherine for the “War Room” hint).
      There may be a need for a “sandbox” where safe routes to prayer can be discussed.

      1. Good idea!

      2. Do let me know and I’ll being my bucket and spade.

   2. As Yeshua Ha’Maschiach (JesusChrist our Lord and Savior) taught us, The Lord’s Prayer in Matthew 6:9-15

      Matthew 5 will be quite moving as this is His message to us when thousands came to see Machiach (Messiah) for the sermon on the mount.

      Ephesians 6: 10-20 Is relevant throughout the ages of the battle between good and evil and for our daily protection.

      Jubilees 12:19-20 Prayer for protection (Abraham’s Prayer) The father of all nations.

      Follow Yahusha’s (Our Heavenly Father’s – Lord Our God-King of the Universe)
      10 Devarim (10 Commandments) He gave us in
      Exodus 20

      The Glorious part is you are seeking! Luke 15:7-10 They are All smiling down upon those who seek!

      Matthew 7:7 (Ask and you shall receive)

      Luke 15:10

      Psalm 91

      1. Please note the difference in text between Matthew 6 and 18th Century and later versions. You might also want to think about why that change occurred.

         1. Oops …. the King James version circa 1610 versus later translations.

4. Dr Farrell seemed confident that the US Senate would not advance the WHO agenda. These guys are less sure.
   https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/global-govt-alert-threat-national-sovereignty-set-go-may-22-28-world-health-assembly/

   “As previously reported at LeoHohmann.com, the deep state predators in the U.S. and Western governments have decided the world needs a centralized pandemic response controlled and run by the United Nations World Health Organization via an international treaty.”

   “Even more pressing than the treaty itself right now, is something almost no one is paying attention to in U.S. political, religious or media circles, and that involves a set of amendments that will set the parameters and define the scope of the proposed new global health treaty. The U.S. government has submitted 13 amendments that it would like to see folded into the treaty, and these amendments are seen by many as sovereignty killers.”

   “In a sense, that already happened in 2020 and 2021, when many of the strictest lockdowns were advised by the WHO and most nations went along with them. But if this treaty is adopted, Katy bar the door because the lockdowns could become even more rigid and more often. Think about the possibilities for a “climate” lockdown.”

   “Whatever we think happened in Wuhan in 2020, the WHO seems to be of the mindset that none of what came afterwards would have happened if they had only been given the power to unilaterally declare an emergency and override the Chinese opposition…. We’re saying it’s an emergency. We’re going to lock everybody down. We’re stepping in…They want to grab power. They’re changing article 12, section 2 and it effectively wipes out 192 nations’ sovereignty to decide whether or not they allow an international organization to step in.”

   “These amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by a simple majority of the 194 member countries of the World Health Assembly countries), these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022). The details of this are not crystal clear.”

5. Thank your for this summary. Always good to get a quick (well…) overview of the state of the world.

   Regarding the discussion about the apocalypse and whether the globalists really believe in it. I am firmly in the camp that they do believe in it. However, I think the cause of the apocalypse that they are envisioning is closer to home so to speak.
   Going back to Malthus, the club of Rome and now the updated simulations done at MIT, I think there has been a lot of thought going into resource constraints.
   A lot of these simulations point to o an acute resource shortage starting around 2025, which will be result in a rapid population decline.
   I brushed off these simulations before. Mostly because I saw the innovation into fracking which seemed to solve the oil problem. Now, that started about t n to fifteen years ago, and the oil boom in the US is already over. So, now I’m starting to think that there’s actually something to this. The fact of the matter is that we do not have the ability of o maintain an industrial civilization without oil. There is no way to project energy to where it’s needed without oil. The scale of power from a gasoline powered lawn mover up to a power plant is just not possible with any other type of energy source.
   So, what will always happen when populations decline and great suffering is everywhere? The elites are toppled.
   I find evidence going back to the Iron Age in Scandinavia where the king is sacrificed to improve harvests. However, there are hints in the records that it wasn’t just a sacrifice, but that it was more of a military coup. Read Snorris tale of Domaldi in Heimskringla for details.
   So, the elite will have to find a way to reduce the population that will not trigger a revolution or a military coup. So, they will need to poison and weaken the population, poison and weaken the military and most importantly stop any kind of restoration of confidence in the population.
   There are so many parts of our present situation that are explainable by this. Basically to them we’re all useless eaters and they do not want to be eaten by us.

   1. My reading of the LTG-BAU progression was that we had found ways to reshape the Seneca curve into a higher peak and a sharper decline. In simpler times ie before the era of Central Banking, and the move from tri-metallic currency, the Elite had only one way out, “Debt Cancellation”.
      Alternatively, when a foreign army appeared at the gates, the slaves revolted.

6. A prepper tip that some may not be aware of:

   Off grid solar systems aren’t allowed within my city’s limits. So I installed what is called a “hybrid” solar system. Most non-rural solar systems capture and re-sell excess electricity back to the power company. But surprisingly, if the power company fails, your solar system will also go offline. With a hybrid solar system, in the event of a power company failure, your system becomes stand alone and continues to operate. Look for this before you buy your in-town system.

7. I think there is a fair amount of merit in discussing the likelihood of Russia being a non-signatory to the mutual assured destruction school of thinking. Someone like Putin is savvy enough to know that a limited use of nuclear weapons in a context such as Ukraine would be extremely unlikely to provoke a full scale retaliation. I think he has the measure of the American military and people like General Milley, who treasonously promised he would tell his enemies before he launched. It’s a lot like threatening to sue them. I think Putin is a better chess player than any presidents we’ve seen except for Trump, who may have been his bete noir. Too bad we have the moron and the pothead to rely on now for executive functions in our staggering empire.

   1. Trump would have kept us out of WHO. So instead of enjoying Memorial Day weekend, I am driving to Geneva to highlight the WHO COUP>

      1. Good luck with that. Wife wonders whether gun control will be a WHO “health” topic. We know how Satan likes to twist meanings.

         1. Domestic Terrorism Bill Stalls, School Shooting, Passes the House, Stalls in the Senate, School Shooting, Senate refuses. More progresses buying guns.

            1. From what I’m hearing, Schumer has put the kibosh on gun control ahead of the midterms WHO is sure to hear lobbying for it and other non-health matters to build out it’s emergency powers platform.

            2. Yes, Schumer would likely prefer a sneak attack.

Comments are closed.