137 Comments

  1. U Penn – my daughter chose Purdue over U Penn this year for her college decision precisely because of the school letting (and celebrating) a man swimming as a woman.

    1. `Just read the U Penn including Wharton is requiring full vaccination. Why would anyone want to study at a university that had no knowledge of science or medicine. It is one thing to live in the dark ages. It is another thing to pay fantastic amounts of tuition to live in the dark ages. I am shaking my head. Stupefying.

  2. “Why Negative Forces seem to Respect Freewill” – Strategies the elite must use to convince us to surrender our free will while, at the same time, recognizing and celebrating the strength of our free will. Reading this essay is a true awakening and a pathway to develop self-awareness to protect yourself.
    https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/mistic/sas08.htm

    1. Thanks, that was long but makes a few subtle points I’ve not seen elsewhere.

      “There are two ways to avoid violating freewill: either don’t engage it in the first place, or do only what the target permits. Reality manipulation occurs from outside one’s realm, and so freewill is not engaged in such cases, so there is no freewill violation. Agents, because they are in one’s realm already and in engagement with a target’s freewill, have no choice but subtly ask permission if they wish to not violate freewill or are not able to do so.”

      This might explain some of the “theatrical performances” used against targets. https://gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/global-satanic-stalking-system-succinctly-described-by-ti/

      Counter-intelligence:
      https://www.quora.com/When-did-you-find-out-you-are-a-targeted-individual/answer/Nicola-Nga?ch=10&oid=228614121

      “only difference now is that I fight back, with full force. I have security whereas all those years ago I didn’t, which made it so easy for these scumbags to target me&my kids. They knew this, and would clearly up the ante with their harassment. After the assaults, I decided no.. MORE.. You bastards don’t get to do this to me or anyone else, so I built up my strength gathered what I needed to fight back against them, and? They HATE IT.. They really don’t like a taste of their own medicine.. I see them now, and I’m in their faces. They park outside my house trying to scare me, I’m like ok cool man, me and my dog Cesar, we’ll just come outside and pay you cowards a visit, not a problem but don’t forget scumbags there’s cameras all over my house.. so be careful how YOU REACT.. Towards me.. And who leaves first? Not me or my dog.. They DO.. I smirk at them? Why? Because I can.. When you have the truth on your side, you can do anything, you’ve got nothing to hide, people like them have too much to hide..”

      More on CI: https://www.quora.com/What-kinds-of-things-can-targeted-individuals-do-to-disrupt-and-or-stop-the-constant-attacks-from-their-tormentors/answer/MorgellonsMicrobots?ch=10&oid=196280498

  5. The Old World Order Is About To Collapse – Peter Zeihan
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRT7P-VKM0k

    Peter Zeihan is a geopolitical analyst, author and a speaker. The world is changing faster than ever, and a lot of the countries, dynamics, peace treaties and structures we’re familiar with may be about to come to an end. Peter’s job consists of him analysing data from geography, demographics, and global politics to understand economic trends and make predictions. And if his predictions are correct, the next 50 years are going to look incredibly different. Expect to learn why China will lose half of it’s population by 2050, why globalisation is coming to an end even though we’re more connected than ever, why population demographics are one of the most important factors in determining the future, whether automation will help or hinder us, whether food shortages are actually something to panic about and much more…

    1. Yes, was meaning to ask Catherine about Zeihan’s view. He is quite triumphalist about American hegemony, which is annoying, but he DOES synthesize a lot of material, and his demographic determinism underlies his analysis of countries’ internal affairs and also geopolitics…China is doomed he says, will have 600 m population by 2050 due to one child policy, France and Turkey might form regional imperiums, many developing countries will de-industrialize, de-urbanized, and so might more developed ones, UNLESS they can secure essential materials and extra workers as boomers everywhere retire, to sustain a modern industrial/informational economy. US in best position because millennial generation much larger than other major countries…Africa will be best situated to ruralize as still have the high birth rate ideal for farm and village life.

      Point being, he has a compelling narrative, and demographics is usually discussed as an internal issue, say on school enrollment or pension funding. in my recollection, it’s not an unheard of topic, but no other person I’ve seen has made it a lynch pin of future prognostication.

      1. Thank you, Janine. Your “read” is much appreciated. I would be interested in hearing what Catherine thinks. Zeihan comes across as a serious researcher and presented a surprising alternative future to what we’ve been discussing here at Solari.

      2. I have listened to Zeihan off and on. Demographics and geography are hugely important and he does a good job of describing them. However, there is a lot he does not include so we come to different conclusions. If American triumphs it will be because of invisible weaponry, combined with liquidation of much of the middle class and the replacement by automation and immigration. It will be an oligarch heaven.

        1. But what do you think of his other predictions, I agree his version of American “survival” is likely more or less business as usual with technocracy, automation and immigration trends persisting, albeit with less global influence. I think he said China HAS to take Taiwan as it is the only non-US dominated shipping lane left, and Russia has to take Odessa for similar reasons. But China seems squeezed both demographically and natural resource wise, unlike Russia which is rolling in resources. He is confident China is toast, which is an outlier position, with that much confidence, I mean. Do you think we’ll see massive de-industrialization of many/most countries? I mean, that is huge, I can hardly imagine it, and the point is this analysis is not based on some crisis or cabal plot happening, just the inevitability of demographics, which is interesting and if plausible means countries should be preparing for this shift now. It’s hard for me to imagine the population and urbanization trends I’ve seen my entire life actually reverse, or how the debt based global growth economy could possibly survive this, which would be great if it could be done without enormous tragedy and suffering. You see I think I and many others are in the mode of believing that our business as usual will continue unless some crisis happens, ecological, world war III, technofascist takeover. What this view says to me is that business as usual cannot possibly continue even without crisis, even without the imposition of the Great Reset.

  6. There’s an interesting article from the 8/19/2022 WSJ: “Banks Nearing $1 Billion Settlement Over Traders’ Use of Banned Messaging Apps: Federal regulators intend to levy the fines over alleged breach of rules that require retention of business records.”

    Here’s an excerpt:

    “The [SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission] investigations examined how traders and brokers used encrypted apps such as WhatsApp to discuss investment terms, client meetings and other business. Under SEC and CFTC rules, brokerage firms are supposed to preserve and monitor their employees’ written communications, which creates a paper trail for regulators who check compliance with investor-protection laws. Services such as WhatsApp and Signal give priority to privacy, and can be set up to automatically delete messages after a number of days or after a chat has been read.”
    …
    “Regulators and compliance experts also worry that spreading a bank’s business across personal and business devices raises the risk that hackers will find a way to steal lucrative commercial secrets, said Mark Berman, a regulatory consultant at CompliGlobe, which serves overseas companies that have to follow SEC rules.”

Comments are closed.