95 Comments

1. Catherine and team, this is about public and private partnerships. Listen to this very interesting exchange regarding SpaceX contract expanding Moon space exploration. Check the question at minutes 47:05 – 49:40 (it talks about how a small team under contract for NASA worked on a business plan for the establishment of a commercial Lunar company 20 years prior…and the answer is telling) which clearly indicates the manipulation of the important space over time. How this has been going over time? Would this ever change? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc6puLU9H6E

   1. Now that is a fascinating tidbit. Thanks!

2. Catherine, what is the real purpose to building/promoting commercial and gov public partnerships? What has been the goals over time? For example, I have seeing that partnerships like that have promoted “business unfairness and speculations” that sometimes is overlooked. Would you agree? And what has been your experience? Thanks.

   1. Strongly recommend Corsos book on this point. The Day After Roswell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Corso
      The primary goal is secrecy when funding with taxpayer money. The second goal is creating and keeping private wealth with taxpayer money. CBDC solves this problem – you can simply take the tax money without representation or having to provide financial disclosure.

      1. I understand, but why would a company or association be part of it? Just for money? Do companies engaging know the implication of the partnering to humanity? These questions are so important to understand in order to help. Also, cooperation is not the same at collaboration. The first indicate a benefit to the company (ex: spacex, etc), the 2nd refers to benefit all involved. Both could be use for negative outcomes towards tax payers. Btw, thanks for the book reference.

3. Would love to hear Catherine of John’s thoughts on this new Consumption tax. Is this good? I can’t believe they are voting to get rid of IRS? Is this good or even possible?

   1. They are voting to cut their recent increase in staff and related funding.

   2. The bill was passed. House GOP passes bill to slash IRS funding in first act of new Congress https://www.axios.com/2023/01/10/house-republicans-irs-funding

4. Geopolitical and economics analyst Peter Zeihan acknowledged that he receives intel directly from the DOD on a recent Joe Rogan podcast. This accounts for the extraordinary level of detail he provides in his daily video blogs.
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ED_yPDdqG5Y

   1. I would take Zeihan (or anyone doing China analysis who mispronounces the Chinese President’s name) with a huge grain of salt. While some of the basis for his analysis may be factually accurate, his conclusions are only his opinion. A lot of the things he says in the clip are also not new; for example China hasn’t been a low cost low end producer for probably a decade already. What makes China different from Mexico or Vietnam as a manufacturing country is the 30+ years of capital investment in production facilities, logistics, and labor force experience that will take many years to replicate elsewhere. No matter how much it appeals to our sense of American manifest destiny, China is not going to disappear in 10 years.

   2. Je Rogan is controlled
      https://www.bitchute.com/video/SseRzhOPtCUR/

5. via Smallstorm.

   Unpacking Damar Hamlin

   https://www.aboutthesky.com/aboutthesky/smallstorm-blog

6. Would be curious to hear Catherine & John’s thoughts on the recent McCarthy Speaker of the House vote? He’s a member of the WEF, so not good???

7. 2023 will be the year the dam breaks.

   https://twitter.com/panajeck/status/1612084245970968583

   https://twitter.com/TheRealKeean/status/1612275241585364993

   https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/status/1611180462680178688

   1. Dam has already broken….the water is still moving quietly.

      1. Indeed. There still seems to be some in denial though.

         https://twitter.com/ctvedmonton/status/1612565551770992640

Comments are closed.