Theme:

Intent: Murder vs. Mistake To Come

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

139 Comments

  1. Catherine:

    Update about homeopathy and Covid. I have personally treated Stage IV cancer patients with Covid and the results are absolutely consistent. Some of the information is a bit technical.

    Dr. André Saine has been a steady contributor to the AIH COVID-19 Data Collection Project. He has just filed a report worth sharing:

    “I have been consulted by twelve cases in the last twelve days with confirmed or suspected Covid (tested and untested) in areas where the Omicron variant is dominant and who had more or less the same symptoms and all responded quickly and very well to each dose of Carbnoneum oxygenisatum.
    The most characteristic symptoms are great to extreme lethargy, apathy, mental dullness and weakness that are worse from the slightest exertion and better from open air. Another interesting symptoms that can be present when Carbn-o. is indicated is disorientation in time and space.
    The patient can have a panoply of other symptoms: cough, sore throat, sore skin, painful joints, fever, chilliness, high thirst but none of these would be decisive to find the remedy.
    The state of apathy is very particular to Carboneum oxygenisatum. One patient who had been in bed for 13 days said that I know I have to go to the washroom but I get so exhausted from just thinking about it that I don’t go. She said once she waited four hours to get up to go to the washroom. She took Carbn-o. 1M around 11.30AM q30m and when I called her back around 1PM she said that she fell so well after the second dose that she got out of the same pajamas she had been in since Dec. 24, took a shower and got dressed for the time in two weeks.
    Carbn-o. was first thought of and used for patients in the later stage of the disease. However a colleague from Holland found it to be the genius epidemicus during the Delta phase in his area.
    It may be difficult for most to prescribe Carbn-o. as it will not come out in repertorization unless you would have a version of Complete Repertory 4.5 in which we have made over 2000 additions that were taken from a review of its toxicology and the excellent proving that the MMPP conducted of it in the spring of 2020.
    If you refer to one of the cases, I presented the AIH October 16 update webinar of a patient that had been on a ventilator for about three weeks and they were ready to pull the plug because the patient was “clinically dead” I told the wife to rub some “holy water” with Carbn-o. and this patient came out of ICU in about five days and he is still responding to Carbn-o. in increasing potencies for the long term effects of severe Covid and intubation, i.e., chest pain, palpitation, SOB, hypertension, paresthesia, paresis, energy, diabetes, etc.
    Beware that the remedy most be given often. Patients have often said that they feel the betterment after each dose and when they wait too long to repeat they do not have further improve or have already started to deteriorate.
    Dr. Pradeep Gupta reported having treated over 12,000 Covid cases in the inpatient and outpatient departments of his hospital in Agra with only two deaths. He gives the remedy in either in the LM potencies q10m the first day for the day in the inpatient department and centesimal potencies (6, 30, 200 or 1M) every 2-6 hours in his outpatient department.
    He also said that he gives the LM q5m for four doses in the very severe cases of SARS and then moved to q10m for four doses so patients have taken eight doses in the first hour.
    The point of this is that posology is important. Unless the patient is very sensitive, I give the 1M every 15-30 minutes at first and the patient may keep doing this the first and second day. A patient said last week that with each dose of Carbn-o. she felt a surge of energy that begins within seconds of taking it.
    I also change the potency after about five days, which gives an extra healing impetus.
    Whenever Omicron has become dominant in an area, I have started telling my patients to switch from Bryonia to Carbn-o. for prophylaxis and in the early stage of the disease and to call me if they don’t respond.
    People who were taking Bryonia for prevention can stop taking it and take instead Carboneum oxygenisatum 200 (we use the 500) every week or so.
    If someone knows they have been exposed yesterday to someone who was diagnosed this morning with COVID-19, they are likely to develop symptoms that day or the next day. I recommend that they take Carboneum oxygenisatum 200 or 500 twice a day for two days.
    If it is too late and they have started experiencing flu-like symptoms I ask them to take Carbn-o. 500 every hour for three doses and keep repeating it the three dose regimen as needed.
    However, if the symptoms are more persistent I ask them to call me and I will then see if Carbn-o. is indicated and if yes I ask to take it more often lets say q20m.
    I had planned a cumulative Covid update webinar for January 7 but I had to postpone it for Jan. 21, because I was waiting for the LHMI colloquium data that was supposed to have been released in December and remains to be available.
    The webinar maybe postponed again if I get the LMHI data in time.
    Don’t worry you will be notified. Also if you can’t attend the update webinar as there is only a limited amount of attendants (250 and we already have 600 registrants) but beware that it will be recorded and made available likely the same or next day at http://www.homeopathy.ca
    Lastly, anyone that would like to share the interesting experience or observations they have so far made in this pandemic, including cured cases or symptoms with Carboneum oxygenisatum, please send them prior to January 19 to cah@homeopathy.ca with the subject COVID-19 Report in order that we can see it quickly.
    Good luck to all and please pass on this message”

  2. I recently stumbled upon a video which I think may have been hidden since the viewing figures are still very low:

    Ralph Baric is surely the Godfather of Coronavirus (+”vaccine”) research …
    It’s his signature on the IP transfer forms for “Moderna Vaccine Candidates” in December 2019. He also features prominently in Dr David E. Martin’s FauciDossier.

    Here he is on Feb 28th 2020. He clearly is an absolute master of the material. He knew everything:

    He says he can – and has been swapping out corona spikes !!!! (Well, many “knew” this, but here it is from the horse’s mouth)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=BE_H7dTqJXU&feature=youtu.be&t=10m18s
    How people die
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=BE_H7dTqJXU&feature=youtu.be&t=25m50s
    … attack rates … and after two years just like common cold
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=BE_H7dTqJXU&feature=youtu.be&t=45m01s

    He also talks through Remdesivir as a therapy and presents some positive-looking in-vitro studies. He mentions the Ebola study … so he must know that it was horrible.

    And here he is in 2021, shilling for the Moderna jab. (Shirt-sleeve rolling and shoulder cleaning – but not a needle in sight ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeIrGrIv7eE )

    1. Yes, this was detailed at length in the 30-part Yoichi Shimatsu series at rense.com, which named Baric and those trained by him, along with the institutions where related research took place. The Shimatsu series started in Jan 2020 and continued into late 2021, with a relatively consistent narrative throughout.

  4. https://www.richplanet.net/vaccine.php

    this is from Richard D. Hall’s website. This seems to be a long and in depth explanation of the nanoparticles in the injections. They describe all sorts of things: nano-routers, nano-tubes, nano-circuits, self-assembling circuits, MAC adresses….you name it.

  5. Catherine, I think you and many here would enjoy this excellent conversation with two worthy modern writers, Paul Kingsnorth and Charles Eisenstein, discussing the globalist machinations via story and myth. Refreshing and spot on (but maybe skip the intro).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okO4H_Y6704

    1. I tried Einstein several times many years ago and got very frustrated and gave up. He was pro-globalist then whether he realized or not.

      1. Kingsnorth is a Christian and shines in the interview. His ‘Vaccine Moment” 3 part piece got a lot of attention. https://www.paulkingsnorth.net/vaccine

        Kingsnorth’s observations and references to story and myth in terms of the globalists and corrupting ‘ring of power’ are excellent but he believes what is coming is inevitable. Eisenstein disagrees and believes something can be done to pre-empt them. Seems he’s come around, but I could be wrong.

        1. Sorry Rich, haven’t heard that term and as there’s so much double speak going on these days – can you explain what an anti-signal is. I’ve only read Eisenstein’s ‘The Coronation” back on 2020 when that went around, so don’t recognize his angle other than that. Read lots of recent Kingsnorth of late tho and found his writing to be interesting.

          1. Apologies for lack of clarity, wrote that in a bit of a hurry. Another description could be “sell signal”, instead of “buy signal”. The complexity of the message can itself be an indicator. Another recent author is Yuval Noah Harari (“Sapiens”).

            Both remind me of this quote: “There is always a well-known solution to every human problem—neat, plausible, and wrong.” — H.L. Mencken (1920)

            They are both sophisticated purveyors of narratives, worthy of some study, if only to understand what neuron-entangling gifts their successors may tender.

          1. A narrative indicator, in one context, of what can be ignored in other contexts.

            He gained visibility in the time of Great Financial Crisis 1 and Occupy Wall Street.

  6. Potential breakthrough on identification of placebos in USA. Next step would be to cross-reference placebos with regional demographics.

    https://www.howbadismybatch.com/expiry.html

    “The govt makes available to medical practitioners a list of expiry dates for all lots. However the CDC keeps this list a guarded secret from the general public (why would that be, I wonder?). However, a contact passed on this list to me. I noticed that the lots on the expiry list are ALL of the ones with the highest number of adverse reactions reports (ADRs) in each alphabet group. I wondered why that was so? Why were none of the other lots on the expiry list – those with only a handful of adrs? (I had previously surmised that the others could be placebo.)

    Then it occurred to me that only the biologically active lots will be on the expiry list, because a degradation of the biologically active ingredients would pose a greater danger than the degradation of a placebo. That’s possibly why the cdc did not want the public to get hold of this list. They only release it to medical professionals – for “security” reasons – because it reveals which are placebos, and which are biologically active”

    2. Ace! Thanks Silvia
      Do you think the narrative is under stress in SUI and FRA ? I think it’s taking a bit of a knocking here in Germany, albeit it varies from one area to another. Where I am (southwest), the people are mostly asleep… but gradually … on Saturday I go see a friend who has been avoiding me for nearly two years. His wife called me in. Said he got injured by the booster 🙁

Comments are closed.