92 Comments

1. While I have always understood Bill Gates’ describing his mRNA gene therapy as a “software of life” just an analogy because well, mRNA does guide the body to, in this case, produce spike proteins, I also always go with my intuition and the hairs on my skin stood up when I listened to Catherine on the Planet Lockdown. that was my spidey sense so to speak saying, yep she is correct and you know this.

   The details is where we differ. Moderna is just Bill Gates’ plan to cull the population, not Slavery 2.0. With that said, Bill Gates is possibly Satan himself and he is the mastermind behind Slavery 2.0 and the real mark of the beast is not these gene therapy injections. Again, Big Pharma just cares about money, they could give a damn about population control one way or the other like Bill Gates does. So where is the…mark of the beast?

   It is literally in another technology that Bill Gates, the spawn of Satan has been developing and was recently given international patent status.

   Here is the mark of the beast, in Gates’ patent W2020060606:

   https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/docs2/iasr/WO2020060606/html/q2VwnWZ1YPFEL6udLbHszDe4mIbB4-wKHkKhg5suIDTr70IAXy_oFDsYVDyPXvRFkDD2t5JvL7aoiTO2W8PEmzI093J8KzhNiiDQxI5zFb1WL9IAR5tj1KSHX31meU2B

   A cryptocurrency system using our biology’s data to discern who can access and use and how much money based on your…biopatterns so to speak.

   I am aware that most people do not like to read technical documents, so you can get a somewhat laymans documentation in Leonids Savins article in the Oriental Review:

   https://orientalreview.org/2020/04/29/bill-gates-vaccinations-microchips-and-patent-060606/

   There is your mark of the beast.

2. Dear Catherine,
   Excellent money and markets with you and John as usual. Bill Gates used to say he would not leave his fortune to his children, so this looks like a perfect setup for money to be moved to the next generation while protecting it from creditors. That continues the theme that he is not a good guy because who cuts their kids out of their estate and allows Melinda to look like the caring mother as she takes care of the kids. As you said, the more the money moves, the tougher to attack.

   Wonder when all the people that think he is a wonderful philanthropist will notice that he really isn’t? The press is being careful not to connect the vaccine work to the divorce articles other than to say that he and Melinda are still committed to the foundation goals. Even though he is being portrayed as a bad guy I guess people are very forgiving about rich men having extra-marital affairs. They have not accused him of pedophilia in spite of the Jerry Epstein connection.

   1. Gates has the spin doctors working to create a false narrative cover for the hypnotized masses. “He’s a ladies man.”
      Not a man who ran Epstein’s trafficking money through the foundation. Not a man who participates in the horror that is pedophilia and human trafficking.Not a man who has anything to do with adrenochrome.

   2. putting money in a foundation is primarily a tax savings vehicle and a business strategy. it’s amazing to me whenever gates, Buffett, Zuckerberg or anyone with a large fortune starts a foundation to leave a majority of their assets, it’s always given the same PR spin on how they are benefactors of humanity. avoiding taxes and whitewashing larger agendas are the primary purpose.

      you can put assets in a foundation and put family members on the board and guarantee them a salary for life. the philanthropic endeavors can feed directly into helping the for profit companies in their businesses – such as bill gates can write off the contributions to his foundation from his income, while the foundation promotes the agenda of Microsoft and big pharma / injections – where bill gates has significant financial interest.

      or you can fund a non profit think tank that pumps out intellectual arguments in favor of the bigger agenda. need a scientific study to justify a policy that will make a lot of money? fund a thinktank to do it. say big tech supporting foundations which publish studies about how important lockdowns are.

      have a PR problem directly lobbying for a policy? get a foundation to finance a non profit that will do it. cut the government into it as well. then it’s a public – private partnership and the windfall from the policy just happens to accrue to the financiers of the foundation.

      I think the motto is own nothing, control everything.

      would be great for solari report to do a close study into the tax and organizational structures of foundations. it’s a bigger PR spin than even the bill gates – benefactor of humanity persona.

      1. 1950s Cox, Reece Committee hearings:
         https://archive.org/details/FoundationsTheirPowerAndInfluenceReneAWormser1958

         1. thanks, will check it out. although these reports are from 60-70 years ago!

            1. that’s funny rich. I don’t think we need to look far to see that they were right 70 years ago.

               I’m always chuckling at the bill gates pastel sweater character and the Warren Buffett I eat a hot dog and down a coke a day character. there are really funny pictures of buffett taking dramatic bites of ice cream cones or swigs of coke during shareholder meetings. and the picture of bill gates and Buffett at a diner enjoying a proletarian meal of hot dogs and milkshakes is precious.

               if Buffett actually drank so much soda he would have died of obesity and diabetes several decades ago. it’s almost a comedy skit except they are being serious.

            2. Your comment above could be a quote from those reports 🙂 There was a time when people did try to bring these issues to public attention. Now we can look back at the consequences and determine if their analysis was correct.

   3. “Wonder when all the people that think he is a wonderful philanthropist will notice that he really isn’t?”

      All the people who think hes a wonderful philanthropist also believed all his covid/vaccine stuff from him.

      1. Aaron,

         In my experience, all the people who think Gates is a wonderful philanthropist get all their news from mainstream media and do not own a computer, only a smart device. Otherwise, they would have seen the dozens of YouTube videos that used to exist of Bill Gates giving talks with his Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population Control. Eventually it was changed to “population and reproductive health”…hahaha. That’s an oldie but a goodie, the changing of the name, for example, from I.G. Farben to Bayer.

         Now you cannot find evidence on YouTube, you have to go to Bitchute:

         https://www.bitchute.com/video/rYU088UR54SQ/

         Now if he is not about population control, what was he saying here, this is his own voice:

         https://www.bitchute.com/video/aFSmjoQezBp8/

      2. Yes

Comments are closed.