Theme:

Central bank control grid construction has begun.

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

99 Comments

  1. So…In my attempt over months to share information with my family…children, husband, sisters…about the injections and some of what I learn about the great reset etc., they now think I need therapy because I have been taken over by a ‘cult’. Really….I am not kidding. So tomorrow my husband and I go see a counselor. I guess the bottom line is they are not interested in hearing about any of it. My intent for going is hopes of opening at least his mind.

    1. One very intelligent subscriber has been struggling with her husband in the same way. Finally he explained that he wanted to be part of society so he wanted his kids to take the vaccination and not go into any of this because he wants to be part of society. So facts don’t matter.

      1. Thanks Catherine. Well, I sure feel badly for that subscriber having to deal with her husband and his pure push for his kids to take it….just awful.
        Interestingly, during our counseling session, my husband read his (and most of the family) concerns and then the counselor asked him ‘what if she is right with what she shares?’ I could see his mind opening immediately!
        The result is for me to understand the fear this is all presenting to us and our kids/grandkids, so not to push info on them unless asked and for my husband to support me and my wisdom and attention to details about the research/understanding/learning, so as to be able to answer questions when they arise. I think that is the best we can do at this point. I am glad we took that action.

    2. I worry about future weaponization of doctor-patient communication as legal evidence for “mental health” assessments.

      1. Actually, that specific thought crossed my mind as well, but the counselor we saw was quite open and more or less agreed with my side, if I could say there were sides.

  2. A comment regarding the supply chain dependence upon trucking:

    My partner runs a freight brokerage company, and almost daily he is informed by truckers and dispatchers that a great deal of the US West Coast back-up is due to California’s governor pulling the permits for so called “air polluting” trucks from hauling freight in his state. There was an abrupt drop in owner-operators who were in fact put out of business by this government move. I haven’t heard this reported anywhere, but all the truckers seem aware of it.

  4. I don’t know if John Titus reads these comments but regarding Robert v. Mulvihill since its based on an administrations redefinition of immunity, wouldn’t the question of Chevron Deference come into play here? In other words what kind of deference will the courts give the Department of Defense’s interpretation of immunity? My question would be, this policy that is being re-interpreted, does it have criminal charges to go along with it?

    I ask that question because in the case of the US Military 6th District Circuit Court ruling regarding bump stocks it was found that:

    If Chevron Deference is allowed in ambiguous statutes with criminal implications then it means we would 1. allow for ATF to create criminal laws through their interpretation of vague statutes, in this case allow DoD to create criminal laws via interpretation of statute

    2. enforce their own newly created interpretations, 3. get to receive Judicial Deference from the Courts anytime someone wanted to challenge their actions based on their interpretations.

    I am just wondering John, if you are reading this, if any of this would be argued in that Robert v. Mulvihill case.

  5. Recently vaccinated athletes collapsing during games is a pretty striking trend. But kids (of unknown vaccination status) collapsing at concerts is a lot less convincing. Could just as easily have been “too drunk” or “too tripping”, etc. — that sort of thing happens regularly. It’s good to talk up events where vaccines are causing collapse in young/healthy people, but only when the data are there.

  6. Vis a vis John’s browser issues, Firefox is not a bad choice. I would strongly recommend a plugin called uBlock Origin to ensure he doesn’t see any YouTube ads (or any other ads for that matter).

    The Brave Browser is also very good and has ad-blocking built in by default, but it has limited plugin support and is based on Chrome’s V8 engine (Google) which presents its own risks. For the technological neophyte, Brave is a good choice as it comes “batteries included.”

    There is aftermarket plugin support to re-add Safari’s text highlighting on browsers like Firefox. Here’s one example:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/textmarkerpro/

    As an aside, if John just updated to Yosemite, it means his hardware is pre-2014 and the OS is largely out of date. There are some serious hardware and software security issues with Intel chips and macOS builds of this vintage, namely the Specter, Meltdown, and Intel Management Engine exploits – for the Average Joe it’s probably not a concern, but for a prominent member of “rebel media” I would strongly recommend patching these.

    I’m sure it’s difficult to navigate away from macOS or Windows for a legal professional or video editor on a full-time basis, but John would be well served by a second laptop running some flavor of Linux, ideally one without IntelME like the offerings from Purism.

    At the very least, I hope this information helps with production hiccups! 🙂

    -Josh, https://privacytogo.co

Comments are closed.