Theme:

The Sheriff of Nottingham Rides Again

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

121 Comments

    1. `Could not watch. Got this message
      BitChute
      Channel Restricted

      The parent channel of this video is unavailable at your location due to the following restrictions:
      Contains Holocaust Denial
      Contains Incitement to Hatred

      1. Wow. I don’t know the channel content but will check it out. The video was regarding the attempted prosecution in the UK of those who were using a drug on those in nursing homes during “covid” outbreak, same drug once used in executions.

        1. Video was entitled The Midazolam Virus. Newspaper article shown entitled “Did care homes use powerful sedative to speed covid deaths?”
          The drug was supposed to be used, they say, to “give a merciful death”, apparently in executions; but actually sounds to be more like a violent smothering.
          I always click on those videos about the nursing homes because the thought often occurs to me: Until we get justice for the elderly (if in fact they moved Covid patients or flu patients out of hospitals in to those nursing homes in U.S. and elsewhere, in others words, murdered the elderly) until we get justice for them by at least acknowledging somehow that it was “wrongful death”, we may be hindered in our fight for the children. That’s why I posted the link; it contained info on Midazolam that I had not heard before.
          Thank you for letting me know that it’s a restricted channel though.
          And, most of all, thank you for your website; it is certainly soothing yet a powerful call to sobriety in our thinking.

  2. The New Asset Class : Owner( Lord of the Manor) buys let’s say , a small agricultural town where part of the “ecosystem” includes the humans/transhumans that reside there. No, It’s too horrible to consider…

  3. I have rarely met a PHD with common sense. Frontline and career healthcare workers knew this “pandemic” stunk from the beginning. Remember we were there for the 100% fatal AIDS “epidemic” . We worked among colleagues who became ill & died but we knew the transmission was different- we watched how it unfolded. Same with this, treatment , from the beginning was blocked- I’ve never seem that in my entire 38 year career- something was up & we all saw it. Frontline workers are intelligent, very observant ( we have to be) and intuitive. We have witnessed active immunity over decades , so we put our heads down & do our jobs, AND we will not bow.

  4. Regarding the discussion of C. Powell, why did they announce he was vaxxed? First thing that came to mind is that it advances the booster narrative. Look what happens when you are ONLY fully and not booster vaxxed! You still get COVID-19 and die!!! H. Aaron died before boosters were being discussed.

      1. You are welcome! Rather, thank you for all the fantastic information you provide. I’ll drop you a note down the line if I can write more on this. My impression is Central Banks have been captured by a CB-bodysnatcher — some outside entity completely runs the show now without even trying to maintain the public appearance of academic research guiding policy. This sets the stage for another 1930s sleight of hand–this time with digital taking the place of paper notes, I am afraid.

    2. I am wondering why Mr Weidmann, Head of Bundesbank, resigned a few days ago. Ideas?

        1. which makes sense since Mr Weidmann has always been an advocate for a stable currency with stable prices.

  6. “Every year the Social Security Administration adjusts the amount that it pays beneficiaries based on the year-on-year increase of the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) from the third quarter. Wednesday morning the US Bureau of Labor Statistics released the data from September showing an increase of 5.9 percent.“

  7. When I read Whitney Webb’s article about the New Asset Class, I interpreted it as creating a way to own the air, water and carbon without actually owning the land. If they can separate ownership into parts like that, the owner of air, water, and carbon can sue the land owner claiming their “use” of the land impacts them. It may be a sneaky way to acquire the land.

    It reminds me of the Canadian farmer who was sued by Monsanto for patent infringement when their pollen escaped to his farm and cross pollinated his corn. As I recall, the expensive legal battle with them cost him his farm and he lost the lawsuit.

    Lawyers, in the US, are taught that the original grant of title to land must originate from the US government. Without the original grant, title is defective. If they separate air, water, carbon from the land itself, the original grant would come from the US government.

Comments are closed.