161 Comments

  1. “People in Switzerland who violate the country’s new heating rules which forbid setting the temperature above 19°C (66.2F) in the colder months will face up to three years in prison.”

    Smart – everything will eliminate the need of police in this case. The party/state/AI will set the temperature for you; … if you have any CO2 quota left.

    Better avoid smart fridge.

    2. Sorin,

      I noticed when I was in Belgium during a wet winter that I felt much colder than here at the same temperature. I decided a wet cold is harder to take than a dry cold climate. I live in a dry climate and it gets very cold here. As cold as -34 C. We keep our thermostat at 15.5 C. We had been keeping it at 10C when we first moved here but then found it was just too hard to take except at night.

      At any rate, I am thinking it would be a good idea to get a dehumidifier for your home if you live in a wet winter area. It is worth a try. Comfort can help deal with a lot of craziness.

      Our winter can last 6 months or longer. I was just tired of being cold so that’s when I started the Wim Hof method hoping to acclimate to the cold. I was born, raised and lived most of my life in a sub-tropical environment.

      I realize you are responding to the control of one’s life rather than the cold.

      “Smart” is the new dumb.

      1. My body is allready rumbling due to humidity. Thank you for the dehumidifier idea, moisty fall is kreeping up fast in Belgium. Any suggestion on a good dehumidifier?
        I am looking into one.

        1. Dehumidifiers also give off a bit of heat during operation, that is really a benefit in cold and wet climates. And it’s not directly connected to the home central heating and surveillance thermostats. 2-3 small ones may work better than a large one, you can strategically locate them throughout the house.

          1. Good idea Andrzej!

            Multiple small dehumidifiers and they will give off heat.

            Alexandra, be sure to check that they are low power usage if possible.

            Good luck!

        2. I’m sorry. I do not have a suggestion on humidifiers as I am in the US. It’s a very simple technology so I’m sure you can find something useful.

          Good luck!

  2. I just wrote a post and it magically disappeared .

    2 devices got hacked this week

    Targeted individuals need to move to caves and write our comments in stone I suppose

    To echo dr farrell on his recent duck duck go / Microsoft connection , my hack seemed to happen on that browser .

    Some descent stuff in that post .

    Darn shame it went poof and disappeared .

    Lots to say

    If ya know of a podcast or tv group looking for content , I have a story to tell and some potential solutions for the threat we face .

    Not in the safest of spaces or best of health due to the unseen / covert tactics used against me for years now so….getting it on wax before I take a dirt nap would be a good idea. Risking ones life like I do talking about this is worth a bigger audience at least .

    Thanks

    Ps to keep my state of amusement the dr office got mad at me cause I never wear a mask so when she shoved one in my hand … I said….
    Oh, you mean a morgellons catcher….

    A joke only gotten by folks at solari..,

    ??

  3. Catherine I think Tucker used bad judgement. Not the first time. He never states the quiet part out loud. It’s about reducing the population and stealing the money. I love your take on all these issues. Great work. Thank you!

    1. I think he lied through his teeth – either because he was ordered to or threatened. Carlson is a very smart guy. The chances that he truly thinks Desmet is the smartest guy he has every interviewed is less than 1%. However, he does love his family and he knows how dangerous the people who run “Operation Smother” are. So my guess is he took the option he needed to get out of the corner.

  4. Look guys, I’m new to Solari and I really value your information and discussions.

    But please, for the love of sanity, don’t just go with whatever Breggin say on Matthias Desmet and Dr Malone.

    I have listened to them and read the book and I believe Breggin is reading into it things I do not see at all.

    It was thanks to Dr Malone’s interview on Joe Rogan that many people woke up, including myself.
    Also, having studied mass formation myself in previous years with regards to the Russian revolution and German history, I do not see any ill intent in Desmets book.

    Desmet would be happy to discuss this with Breggin. But seems Breggin is not.

    Please just look more closely into this before judging people as “bad” because Breggin say so.

    I must say, having listened to Breggin in interviews, I’m not particularly impressed and find he might be suffering from a bit of jealousy perhaps. Just my opinion.

    In any case , I really like your Money and Markets reports, but please don’t pick sides with this and reading ill intent into Desmets book just because of defensive feelings.

    Why don’t you setup an open discussion between them. Desmet would be eager to talk it out as he stated in a recent message to his followers.

    Marlene, New Zealand

      1. Thanks for the reply Catherine.

        I value the Solari report and your views and enjoy watching your interviews and talks as I did, and still do, learn a lot from you.

        I guess I’ll just have to agree to disagree when it comes to your opinion on Desmet and his book, and leave it there. Only time will really tell how things develop around him.

        I’ve read many of the works of Solzenitzyn, Nietzsche, Jung and Frankl and a lot of the ideas Desmet discussed have really been borrowed from them, and I think he does it accurately. I would still welcome a discussion between him and Breggin at some point, but much more so between him and someone like Jordan Peterson. But this is just my own personal field of interest (Not entertainment – genuine interest)

        I still value the good information you bring with regards to money, markets and current affairs and will continue to stay tuned. I especially enjoyed your recent interview with Ovalmedia as it was packed with information.

        I’ll just have to endure the negative comments on Desmet and make peace we can’t all agree all of the time 🙂

        Marlene

        2. FYI = Just sent this last night to another wonderful person who disagrees with me about Desmet.

          ==================

          > Thank you for your detailed feedback. It is always appreciated.
          >
          > Re: Dr. Malone
          >
          > I appreciate that he has helped many people understand some of the risks associated with the injections. I do not post his interviews on Solari as I believe that there are better sources and because I question his credibility on a variety of topics. My involvement with the Doctors for Covid Ethics has given me access to an extraordinary network of doctors and scientists. Running a high filter on these topics without them would have been impossible. I recommend their website and symposiums to you.
          >
          > Re: Mattias Desmet:
          >
          > Before Desmet published his book, I listened to some of his material on line and published the following discussion with Ulrike who hosts our Future Science Series:
          >
          > https://home.solari.com/control-freedom-happen-one-person-at-a-time-with-ulrike-granogger/
          >
          > I was persuaded that he had little or no understanding of the actual control grid and this might help him and those who were exploring theories of why so many people appeared to be acting against their own best interests. As I was being lobbied to embrace him and his work, I thought a detailed explanation of why I thought the mass formation theory was not useful would be productive. I was also concerned that without seeing the control grid, many of us would not back out in time.
          >
          > In response to more lobbying, I did get and read the book as did Ulrike. She wrote an excellent review which we published here:
          >
          > https://home.solari.com/book-review-the-psychology-of-totalitarianism-by-mattias-desmet/
          >
          > I agree and have regularly pointed out that Desmset did not add the term psychosis – that was Dr. Malone. From what I can tell, it is Dr Malone that was promoting Desmet and the theory and then adding psychosis. Dr Malone then suggested this is why the US regulatory authorities should not be held responsible. However, it does appear that the move to weaponize mental health is reflected in the machinery being built in the related institutions. Mass formation is a theory with the potential to popularize the notion and help cover up the actual control grid. But the dangerous machinery is inside the line institutions.
          >
          > Given my responsibilities, this effort to understand and communicate my conerns reflects a serious investment of my time to understand people or theories that I would never recommend to my subscribers. In retrospect, I should have spent less time on it given the opportunities to publish materials that would benefit our subscribers.
          >
          > When you say:
          >
          > “I have to say I really lost respect for you based on your reporting on this”
          >
          > I should tell you that I have heard this sentiment thousands of times over hundreds of issues over a lifetime of trying to unearth the truth. I took the time in Ask Catherine this week to discuss my hope that I can do a better job of helping people navigate these kinds of situations. Here is the link:
          >
          >
          > https://home.solari.com/catherine-on-disinformation/
          >
          >
          > My goal at Solari is to help you live a free and inspired life. Ultimately that means you must decide these things for yourself. What I can do is give you my best assessment.
          >
          > My assessment is that the theory of mass formation is essentially useless and if it gathers steam it will misused in potentially horrifying ways.
          >
          >
          > All the best. Again, your honest feedback is very much appreciated,
          >
          >
          > Catherine
          >
          Additional info sent on 2nd eamil

          Additional background which will help with this topic and many others are:

          https://home.solari.com/future-science-the-wave-genome-with-ulrike-granogger/

          https://home.solari.com/blast-from-the-past-deep-state-tactics-101-part-1-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

          I am a big fan of Rupert Sheldrake and his theories of “morphogenic fields” and shared intelligence – as we do resonate with each other. A summary work that does a good job of surveying the research in this area as of its publication date is The Field by Lynne McTaggart – this and additional books by McTaggart are regularly included in our annual Best Books section.

          https://lynnemctaggart.com/about/lynnes-books/

          We live in a world where there is always more to learn and read!

          1. Thank you – I had a look through these.

            I do like Sheldrake as well. I have not read his books yet but I listened to some interviews with him and talks he gave online some years ago. I was very interested at the time between the discussions, arguments and debates of Jordan Peterson and Sheldrake against the arguments of the so-called “4 horsemen” atheists (Dawkins, Dennett, Hitchens and Harris).

            Having gone from Christianity to atheism and returning back to Christianity during my life – I can say it has been a great journey and I value people such as Peterson and Sheldrake who can explain how empty, inhumane and essentially blind, atheism and the materialistic view of man and life, actually is.

            Very interesting topic.

    2. You may want to listen to this interview. I think you may be confusing entrainment with a false notion of MF.

      Entrainment Technology, Subliminal Programming & Financial Manipulation
      June 10, 2018 25
      https://home.solari.com/entrained-subliminal-programming-and-financial-manipulation/

      Transcript of the August 18, 2011 Solari Report: Adam Trombly 0n Subliminal Programming
      https://audio.solari.com/sr2011/Solari_Report-Adam_Trombly_on_Entrainment-2011-08-18.pdf

      From the transcript page 11:

      C. AUSTIN FITTS:…there is such a thing called entrainment and it can be used for the positive. It doesn’t have to
      be used for the negative.

      ADAM TROMBLY: Certainly, when it was first researched in Germany in the
      late 1930s and late 1920s — the first initial use in 1929 in Munich — it
      was first researched for therapeutic benefit.

      This technology is nothing new. Also, perhaps read Secret Don’t Tell,by Carla Emery.

      When Obama ran for president he had huge crowds like Hitler. Amazingly, If one compared the facial expressions of their audiences they were eerily the same. We had African Americans declaring “Obama is going to pay my mortgage” and also I saw a clip of one woman say “Obama is going to save the world. Sadly, non of that was real.

    3. I am not saying Catherine has no sharing in emotion but I perceive fact as her driving force in sharing intelligence, not emotion. That is what I find so refreshing at being a member of Solari.

    4. Hi Marlene,

      Does it not make you suspicious that Malone, a man claiming to have invented mRNA technology, also claims (when he first popped up in the June 2021 Darkhorse podcast) to have taken the “vaccine”? Months later, on the Rogan podcast, he announces that he’d “had c19” in early 2020. (He still took the injection? really?) And on that same Rogan podcast he says he had an adverse reaction, (which he somehow forgot to say on the Darkhorse podcast). He also drops in having been involved with Zika, and Ebola vaccines, and having connections to the CIA and Anthony Fauci. Oh, and he has a therapeutic in trial. This guy has serious credibility issues.

      I bought the Desmet book too, and the first 40 pages were such absolute junk that there was no point in wasting any further time on it. In particular, he seems to be redefining / confusing (generally accepted) definitions of words like “science”. What’s the point of talking with someone like this?

      Nick

      1. Hi Nick
        I must say I haven’t delved into Malones background, nor am I particularly interested to do so. I feel by now I have heard about all he has to say. I’m just very thankful his interview with Rogan woke me up enough to prevent me getting another shot. Rogan has a very wide reach.
        And I was also thankful it made me lookup Mattias Desmet and listen to his interviews.

        What you think of the Desmet book, fair enough. To each his own.
        We can’t all think alike and agree on everything.
        I realise that.
        Marlene

        1. Hi Marlene,

          That’s great that Rogan/Malone convinced you not to get another shot. Malone has put out some very solid information. Nevertheless, it looks to me like there is a large amount of “limited hangout” going on. i.e. “They” know they can’t keep the lid on all the information, so they try to control the narrative and the channels, absorb time, distract, throw a couple of bones. Like I said, I first saw Malone on the Dark Horse Podcast – a few people said “you must watch this”, but quite frankly, it was hour after hour of excruciatingly slow chin-stroking, so, many people will have missed the “nuggets” of information by which Malone seems to give himself away. I’m just trying to be helpful. I’m pretty sure that Malone won’t take you all the way.

          All the best, Nick

      2. Thank you for validating my feelings on the players here. Credibility is most definitely an issue based on what I’ve heard from sources I trust.

  5. Brian Pallister, is Former Premier of Manitoba that said what Catherine is referring too. He was clearly telling the people what gun was to his head. His subsequent departure from politics, statements since confirmed exactly what Catherine said

  6. With regards to the story about the Rockefeller Foundation funding a study to unravel the mysteries of “vaccine” rejection… I believe this is a new kind of propaganda I call “Soothing Propaganda” -and it’s designed to assuage the anxiety of the vaxxed… Another example is the recent partnering of Moderna and Monash University here in Australia. Both stories promote a subtext that there is nothing wrong or bad about the “vaccines”… both stories got a lot of media coverage despite really being much ado about nothing.

  7. A PhD in labeling seems to have scared John Titus. I read the labels every time I do grocery shopping. Its easy, if you see something like “monosodium nitrate” for example, just ask yourself, do I have a jar or box of that in my pantry? DO I grow that in my backyard? No? Then it probably should not be in my food.

    The only ingredients in your food should be whatever it takes to make that food. For example, bread…yeast, flour, water, maybe some herbs, spices or nuts. Thats it.If you see anything more, like maybe Tricalcium phosphate, again, ask yourself, do I keep a jar or box of Tricalcium phosphate in my pantry? No? Then put that bread back, if its not an ingredient that you cook with, it should probably not be in your body.

    Ingredients in the food you buy at a corporate store or even a small mom and pop grocery store, should not sound like a chemistry experiment, it should sound like grandma’s old recipe and Tricalcium phosphate just does not sound like an Old World recipe, it sounds like a chemistry experiment…put it back.

    2. Well said! I agree completely. Labels are not difficult to read with this approach. Due to a casein sensitivity I started reading labels back in the 80’s. Like anything else, the more you do it, the easier it gets. Thankfully, my aging, nearsighted eyes can still read teeny, tiny print! Bon appetit.

    3. Good advice Daniel.

      It’s a good idea to not buy anything with more than 6 ingredients that you have no trouble identifying or pronouncing their names.

      John, if the word is hard to pronounce …Don’t eat it! ; )

      They tried to con us by using a meme “better living through chemistry”. The meme should have been “better killing through chemistry”.

Comments are closed.