Theme:

What’s Next for the Going Direct Reset? With Jon Titus

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

92 Comments

  1. Battle for Humanity is a brain bender. I do not think the WEF plan will take because they will never takeover China, Russia, Asia, the Middle East nor most of Africa. The target is the USA as Europe and the Commonwealth have caved. The US will buy in and then break up. Ultimately the WEF will fail. Solari forever!

  2. Dear Catherine

    On the 24th February the Fed system was down for several hours. The outage was not covered on the Fed’s web page but it was fleetingly reported in the media to have been a ‘fat finger’ mistake.

    Can the entire payment system which routes trillions in payments for the world economy be taken down at once with the push of a button, or could it have been a cyber security event? If it was indeed an attack, then by whom?

    1. Could have been an attack. My vote is they wanted to move a large amount of money secretly.

  3. Hi Catherine – any thoughts concerning the announcement from TIAA-CREF this week that Thasunda Duckett will become President and CEO? She is coming from JP Morgan. She will be replacing Roger Ferguson the former Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System. Conflicts as usual????
    On another note, any thoughts about the FRED system no longer publishing the M1 Money Stock starting February 23, 2021? This is now going to be published monthly (monthly average data). Thank you! Karen

  4. Catherine- I just listened to your “update” with Mark Skidmore. I didn’t hear anything “new” since last August’s report. While you indicate that some Federal employees are quitting to “go physical” with their 403 (b) -Gfund- balances, you do not necessarily advocate such an action. Or rolling the g fund balances into an eligible trust that contains physical assets. There is no IRA with a govt treasury return guarantee like the G fund, or with lower annual service fees,so what are you advocating exactly such people DO? Thanks!

    1. Scott:

      Another $35 Trillion+ in undocumentable adjustments strikes me as new news.

      I am not recommending what you do. That is your call. You need to decide what the value of the US government guarantees is worth, what the lower fees are worth, what the current management practices imply in terms of risks and how those risks and rewards relate to your overall financial profile.

      It is my practice to recommend you not listen to experts, but collect intelligence on what is REALLY happening and then take responsibility to make informed decisions yourself. In part, this is because in a world deteriorating into lawlessness, it is anybody’s guess what contracts will be honored and which will not. It is a 100% political call – nothing to do with law or economics.

      Catherine

      1. CAF: Sensible. But what i have long thought (if not just hoping to believe) is that it is not politically possible to upset millions of retired (if not active military relying on promises) gun-owning military and civilian agency pensioners with the “new system” (digital, or combined with cash for the solvent not in any debt) that discounts too much or eliminates their chits. Or explain to me why we must assume no sanity in “their” ranks to maintain order/stability, the things they profit from. Thanks again for the great work that you do. sw

        1. If you can turn people’s minds on and off with entrainment, and turn their banks accounts on and off or empty them with 1-off bail ins, you can inspire a lot of compliance.

  5. (2nd attempt to post, previous post “held for moderation”)

    In June 2020, Chris Sky (Canadian activist) gave a concise 2 minute statement of points similar to the CAF video interview from Planet Lockdown: https://twitter.com/zneveri/status/1349460356595376133

    As of Feb 22nd, Canada requires inbound travelers to pay $666/day ($2000 for 3 days) to be quarantined while awaiting Covid test-on-arrival results, even if their Covid test-before-departure was negative. In the following videos (the first one is at the airport), Chris Sky challenges the new rule.

    Feb 2021: Airport quarantine refusal: https://www.instagram.com/tv/CLkzuFAB7wx/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
    Feb 2021: Post-airport interview: https://youtube.com/watch?t=6m52s&v=5Dq_2qPHDCo
    Feb 2021: Pre-arrival interview in Turkey: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P7FQ61dfa0

    1. Chris Sky airport video went viral: https://twitter.com/chrissaccoccia1/status/1364559935426674694

      “White collar speed trap” via border control app? https://twitter.com/josedominio/status/1364344112879575043

      https://www.insauga.com/international-travelers-are-walking-out-of-mississaugas-pearson-airport-ignoring-quarantine-rules
      “Peel Police have confirmed they are not detaining or arresting people who leave the arrival area. As well, others who refuse to take the mandatory COVID-19 test or book the quarantine hotel upon arrival, are opting to receive a fine that is cheaper than the quarantine cost and then are released to go home. The fines are usually in the $820 range while staying at an approved quarantine hotel could cost up to $2,000.”

      (Jan 2021) “A Day Without A Mask” tutorial on shopping without a mask
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjFP3tT5CQo

  7. Catherine, what’s the play with the farm land acquisitions by fake meat advocates? Will this dovetail with the green new deal / carbon credits so that the added value of that land will be the value of carbon credits available to sell to industrial producers? I’ll note that most of the Opportunity Zones are located in rural areas, putting rural land into play under the Opportunity Zone scheme.

    Under this scheme, the land owner can decrease food production while creating income from fallow land. Also a high barrier of entry to industry will be created (credits for new industrial facilities will be expensive and the land owner can decide who gets them and for how much), consolidating control of any new industrial production.

    It’s the only way I can make sense of investing in farmland while advocating for less farm production.

      1. The article on Wired explains it pretty well: Tax payer dollars – 1 billion “carbon bank” to purchase carbon credits from farmers who adopt these practices. https://www.wired.com/story/president-biden-please-dont-get-into-carbon-farming/?mbid=social_facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_social-type=owned&utm_brand=wired&utm_source=facebook
        The final quote: The closer you look at carbon farming, the more it comes to resemble a sweet deal between Big Ag and corporate America to promote a painless and uncertain climate solution while tapping into public money along the way. It may be too late to stop this train, but taxpayers should not supply its fuel.” As you always say: Follow the money…another cya scheme.

        1. carbon trading is an incredible scheme. it creates a commodity out of thin air. it can be passed off as a tax on any activity – be it consumption, transportation, or production. it creates a higher barrier to entry for any business, especially manufacturing. it favors large land owners who can monetize this scheme /including federal and state forest lands and large pension funds / corporations who are major landowners/. from what I understand, carbon trading requires fairly sophisticated GiS satellite and computer models whose cost would be beyond any value a mom and pop landowner could get for the credits on small acreage.

          any market needs scarcity to function, so carbon credits will be scarce and up for bidding. and if being able to purchase carbon credits will be a prerequisite for environmental permits from EPA etc., then a few landowners and carbon traders will control who can build a factory or open a business. from my understanding, Chesapeake Bay has a pollution trading scheme, where any new industry has to offset their pollution by buying credits. of course this deal is at whim of the seller.
          https://www.cbf.org/issues/water-quality-trading/

          best part is, the carbon credits will be funded by consumers, who will see the cost of everything in their life go up, and as they said in davos, we will be happy having less! I.e. happy being poor, because the large landowners and investment banks are skimming off the proletariat carbon tax base. oh sorry, i meant happy saving the environment.

          it’s actually very plausible because it has something for big corp big government and wall street.

      2. I am in line to inherit a farm, a huge blessing, but this video gave me some insights that I did not consider. While there is no livestock, there are long term leases in place for livestock holders to graze the property. I will be on the learning curve here – along with my new greenhouse!

      3. wow, this explanation was eye opening. “You will own nothing and you will be happy”, and this seems like the mechanism to do so. Tax unrealized gains to steal private property from the rightful owners.

        I’m a pretty new subscriber to the Solari Report, but there is a lot of great info here.

        1. When we stop spending any time listening to the shriek-o-meter and start teaching each other, our learning metabolism kicks up much higher. Sriek-o-meter has been pouring a lot of salt water taffy into our learning motors

      4. wow, that’s frighteningly fascinating. it’s really going on.

        i think the carbon ‘thing’ (it’s not a tax or credit or scheme – but an ideology) is even more bizarre. on the material level, you can follow it in many directions, and see how it ties into the virus agenda, the land grab agenda, the ‘be happy with less’ agenda, the technocratic ‘we’ll monitor your carbon footprint’ 5G agenda, etc…..but i think it’s even more perfidious than that. it’s really an ideology and world view, where carbon is an evil.

        as much as you see a covid cult now, i bet you’ll see a carbon cult, where the carbon emitters – the meat eaters, the consumers, the property owners – will be the new sinners, and the carbon neutral folks – the fake meat eaters, carbon credit buyers, UBI recipients – will be the new righteous ones. the carbon cult will be righteous on the basis of their renunciation of carbon activities (penury), and will receive penitence from the holy central govt by paying their rightful carbon tax. by doing that, the carbon cult will justify their existence (and be happy with having less), while the carbon sinners will be against nature.

        even weirder is that oxygen is the other side of the Co2 chemical equation. so if you really want to eliminate Co2, you should eliminate the catalyst – oxygen consumption. Oxygen is necessary for life. So, no life, no carbon. the ultimate carbon credit – righteous population control.

        this is ‘high octane speculation’ of course, but when someone wants to create a marketing campaign, it has to be anchored in a very simple idea – and what better idea to anchor it to, than to an already existing ideological system (christian doctrine)? and then subvert it from the inside. it’s also interesting to see because countries which do not have western christian traditions of sin and repentance – such as china and india – are not buying into the carbon thing not just as a matter of government, but also as a matter of society.

        anyway, it’s a fascinating concept, this carbon thing.

      5. This book was recently highly recommended to me – it’s on my order list – for German speakers:

        Suendenbock CO2 Plädoyer für ein lebenswichtiges Gas – Markus O. Haering
        https://www.markus-haering.com/suendenbock

        “The most complete and balanced book I have seen on the CO2 debate.
        Easy to read. Great job!”
        (Harry Hendrickx, Economist, The Netherlands)

Comments are closed.