141 Comments

  1. Norway: There are about 40 salmonella infections in Norway at the moment, the FHI (Folkehelseinstituttet – Institute of Public Health, director Camilla Stoltenberg, NATO’s GS Jens Stoltenberg’s sister) is conducting an inquiry into where the source of the infection can be traced – and guess what they are using? The FHI is asking people for their food purchase receipts and printouts of their online bank accounts and FHI goes through it: https://www.nrk.no/vestland/utbrudd-av-salmonella_-flere-tilfeller-pavist-_-fhi-jakter-kilden-til-smitte-i-matvarer-1.16201493. Put this in context with the plan of the Central Office for Statistics (SSB) to digitally collect everybody’s receipts for grocery shopping (via the retailers, and there are only 4 big ones in Norway with regards to food) in order to be able to analyze people’s food consumption behaviour (all anonymized, of course, no individualized data – what could possibly go wrong??)…”nudging” people towards accepting this kind of analysis for health purposes (in order to track down dangerous outbreaks of whatever)…

    1. Looks like the Norwegian Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet) may be vetoing the Statistics Office wish for collecting all receipts electronically: https://nrkbeta.no/2022/11/30/ssb-vil-ha-dine-matkvitteringer-datatilsynet-varsler-om-et-forbud/
      https://www.datatilsynet.no/aktuelt/aktuelle-nyheter-2022/varsel-om-vedtak-om-forbud-til-ssb/
      here was the original story: https://nrkbeta.no/2022/05/28/ssb-krever-a-fa-vite-noyaktig-hva-nordmenn-kjoper-i-matbutikken/

  2. Do you know how the internet works?
    Every time you click a link it sends your IP address to the destination.
    Every time you load an image it sends your IP address to the machine that hosts the image.
    Every time you view an embedded tweet, facebook button, instagram post, etc that it sends your IP address to them.
    If you use most social media, they can directly track most off-site behavior and tie it specifically to you.
    Using your IP address, marketing & advertising firms and anyone they sell their data to (including the gov’t) can identify who you are and what content you are viewing.
    This data can be collected and cross-referenced to build a detailed personality profile on you and everyone you know.
    Your data can be used to build a highly unique “signature” associated with your online activity and simple counter-measures like a VPN can be defeated by tracking your signature.
    Your data can be cherry-picked to paint whatever picture your enemies wants about you.
    Browsing with Javascript on can allow compromised websites to perform drive-by attacks and compromise your computer, allowing further penetration like stealing your PII, money, and passwords.
    Your ISP can insert payloads into your data stream and perform drive-by attacks on any website that doesn’t use HTTPS.
    Even if you don’t use major social networks, the internet is, by design, a giant and nearly perfect surveillance system.
    They even measure the extent you try to evade tracking.
    Apple and Microsoft operating systems have a massive and growing list of zero-day flaws that allow bad actors to penetrate even the most sophisticated user.
    So much scuttlebutt recently about individuals being compromised, or organizations being compromised. Guess what? If you’re online, we’re all compromised. Even our enemies.
    At such point as organized crime decides you’re a problem, they can use your data to implement a specialized attack vector with a highest likelihood of success.
    I commend Solari for self-hosting content and minimizing the exposure of the Solari audience to these various forms of tracking.
    We sorely need parallel systems like this. We need users and creators to realize that they are sabotaging themselves and their audiences by engaging with major social media platforms. We need decentralized systems that distribute the risk of engaging in mass telecommunication.
    Until we have those systems available, we need to make the surveillance as difficult and expensive as possible.

    3. Thank you Josh for this rundown of how the data collection works – it’s important to understand how data is collected so we can be more aware of how we are feeding the data beast. Do you have any understanding of how the RF (radio frequency) smart meter plays into this data collection and compilation? We are working to educate our local utility boards and community as to why not to adopt RF smart meters for electric, gas and water, and we are only just beginning to understand the surveillance capabilities ourselves. As we better understand it, we can do a better job of explaining it to our local decision-making boards. Any insights would be much appreciated! Thanks again!

      1. > Do you have any understanding of how the RF (radio frequency) smart meter plays into this data collection and compilation?

        I don’t have specialized knowledge in this area but it can be extrapolated pretty easily.

        Let’s entertain the possibility that you have something constantly monitoring your electricity usage with high fidelity over a long period of time. Having a large database of known quantities (e.g. the average usage pattern of a refrigerator or a toaster) and automated statistical analysis comparing various loads in your home with with said data-sets, it is incredibly feasible that I could identify each of the devices (or at minimum the type of devices), when they are on, and probably even down to the specific circuit they are on (by correlating load changes among multiple devices when one device is switched on/off). No SMART WiFi-connected devices needed.

        I’m not an electrical engineer and I don’t know of any specific smart meters that have this capability. That said, I think it’s commonly understood that manipulating the waveform can disrupt, overload, or damage devices. For example, each device has different power requirements (why we have a lot of different proprietary power cables). If I can arbitrarily decrease or increase the load on specific circuits that may, at the very least, damage connected devices. This is one reason for having devices behind a UPS, among others.

        I think the RF field itself also poses a risk. There is a lot of chatter in the conspirosphere about modulating 5G signals to repurpose them as a weapon, less about the tracking or surveillance implications. Devices exist that can “see through walls” using RF to essentially map structure interiors. We enable this by connecting everything up via WiFi, or using WiFi at all. More “added value” for your “SMART home”.
        https://www.businessinsider.com/wifi-camera-sees-through-walls-2017-5

        And then of course there are the health implications of being radiated constantly which despite many claims about it’s “safety,” radiation still poses a risk physiologically. I would seriously question the veracity of scientific material on this, like many other things.

  3. Just thinking out loud

    What I cannot get my head around is why 99% of hospitals, medical clinics, and doctors did not question an experimental “jab”into the arms of their patients. Not only that they injected themselves with it. With the unfolding of the many injuries connected with the “jab” and boosters one who think there is going to be many lawsuits filed against those in the medical profession. Should there be charges with a crime? A crime against humanity? Are they on solid ground stating “they had faith in the “jab”?

    Or with the recent FTX exposure were some (or many) hospitals, medical clinics, and doctors paid a kickback to administer the “jab”. Were there incentives? If so how were they paid? By check? Well that could be traced. How about in cryptocurrency? Is that trackable? If you look at the Bitcoin chart it was trading around 13K in October 2020 and suddenly by March 2021 it is up to 57K. October 2021 it went over 60K. And when was the push to get the “jab?’. When Biden (if it is him) became President in Jan 2021.

    Soooooo, if the medical professional took bitcoin or other crypto as an incentive and now bitcoin is trading at 16K would they lodge a complaint they were ripped off?

    Catherine, are you up to speed with the Supreme Court accepting a Jan 6th complaint filed in pro se? One has to ask why the SC decided to accept it after they did not act on so many other complaints dealing with the 2020 election fraud. Did the SC accept it as a chess move if the House during December gets a little adventurous trying to pass term limits on the SC justices? Or maybe to pack the SC to 13 or 15 members? Maybe the SC is going to dangle the pro se complaint to back the House down.

    Or does the SC want to hear the complaint to once and for all decide if politicians have immunity on any decisions they make? If my memory serves me I believe there were 100 members of Congress on Jan 6th who wanted additional 10 days to hear from States that had evidence of election fraud to be presented and considered. If the SC decides to hear the complaint (need 4 judges out of the 9) the possible ramifications is immense.

    Plus, don’t forget Amicus briefs can be added to the pro se complaint.

    Is this the black swan no one saw coming? I always felt their is a Divine presence and usually God likes to surprise man on what HE can do in His time despite what man thinks is possible.

    Prayer is good, prayer with repentance is better, prayer with repentance and cleansing is best.

    That’s it.

    1. I understand the Supreme Court will holding the conference on January 6th to vote if they wish to hear the pro se complaint. It takes 4 yes vote out of 9 to kick it forward.

        1. Agree, it looks like a hail mary to me if I believe what I only see.

          I listened to one of the brothers, Lol Brunson, doing an interview and what got my interest is how helpful was the SCOTUS clerk. The Clerk even told the brothers what they wanted to be included. Then the Clerk wanted to get the updated complaint in their hands quickly. Why is the SCOTUS clerk being an advocate? Is it self serving to push back the December House from voting on Term limits for the Court or packing the Court? Is it a way to protect the immunity that the members of Congress have while serving in Office? Or, is it a step to attempt by the Supreme Court to instill integrity into Congress. To boil it down the issue if the members of Congress have sovereign immunity are thus protected if they have aided enemies of the Constitution. According to Lol Brunson the SC has slated the conference on Jan 6, 2023 to vote to go forward or not. Need 4 votes out of 9.

          Catherine, lets look at the big picture on how to establish a better world. What does Congress, Big Pharma, medical field, crypto, justice system, wall street, mass media, social media, etc.have in common? There is no integrity. How can a society operate without a sense of fairness? It cannot. We are on a path of crash and burn.

          So maybe this “pro se fluke” complaint getting into the hands of the Supreme Court may be a peaceful way of peeling the onion as a start to get back on the road of integrity. We are suppose to follow the rule of law. Maybe it will lead to term limits for Congress members and strip their immunity.

          Lets see who comes forward and submits an Amicus brief to support the Brunson brothers. In their younger days the Brunson brothers were musicians. Guess what instrument they all played? Trumpets. Come on you can’t make this stuff up. Non lawyers getting the Supreme Court to accept a complaint where so many high priced lawyers failed and the brothers are ex-trumpet musicians that may lead to instill integrity into Congress by taking away their immunity on treason and sedition? This is so out of the box, but could it happen?

          The brothers have a website that gives an overview of their activity.
          ralandbrunson.com

          1. Wish you were right, Bob. I just don’t see this going any where in the Supreme Court. That said, open to miracles. It is Christmas time.

          2. Yes, it would be a miracle if it leads to taking away the immunity of Congress members. Ever since the early morning hours of the 2016 elections when the vote tally stopped for 30 minutes I sensed a Divine presence to begin the exposure of corruption in America. Now, will the Supreme Court rule in favor of the Brunson brothers? I have no idea, but if the SC does it would be something that no one saw coming.

  5. Michael Crabtree’s comment has been deleted. Michael, this is your last warning. Next time your subscription will be cancelled.

  6. Hello fellow subscribers. Hope everyone had a pleasant Thanksgiving. Has anyone else seen this?:

    https://breggin.com/Breggins-Sued-by-Dr-Robert-W-Malone-for-25-million-dollars

    It reminds me of the recent Alex Jones situation, as well as what is now happening to British-based investigative researcher, Richard D Hall.

    Clearly the parasite class are more worried about some truths than others, and want to send all of us a warning by making examples out of certain people.

Comments are closed.