141 Comments

  2. Catherine,

    I’m wondering if you think Malone is genuine on some level. My reading of him is he is a deep state creation. His claims and opinions on the scamdemic don’t pass the sniff test. Thinking his job is to take down the Breggins, or at the very least, shut them up. That’s the most logical explanation of Malone taking legal action after a cease and desist letter with no subsequent activity on the part of the Breggins.

    Invented the mRNA vaccine? No way. If he is a REAL research biologist, he knows very well that can’t work, and, in addition there are no viruses. If he doesn’t know these things, he’s a complete fraud. Take your pick.

    2. I have not published or linked to Malone’s work as he supports a future vaccine schedule. Given the corruption of the current pharmaceutical companies and the regulatory infrastructure it seems the current pipeline constitutes the equivalent of a serial felony operation. Why keep it going? The corruption has been and is beyond any acceptable norm. Does not make sense to me. It needs to be moved to a zero-budget basis. Since Malone has stated that he wants a senior position in the US government, best to not promote people whose policies are not aligned.

      Another reason is it looked to me like he wanted to use the mass formation theory to protect the regulatory agencies from being held accountable. Covid-19 was a mass atrocity, not a mass formation. Accountability is at the the heart of turning the system right – in both the financial area as well as health. Millions of people have been murdered and disabled. Laws broken. Without the rule of law, civilization ends. Back to my old adage, “crime that pays is crime that stays.”

      I should note that my friends at CHD credit Malone with doing a good job defending the use of Ivermectin and HCQ – including in Dr Nass’s case, which I appreciate. That is a very useful contribution.

      I think filing a lawsuit given what it says against the Breggins was a tragic mistake – Malone has thrown his hat in the ring to work in government. That means it is fair game to discuss his opinions and qualifications. The best way to handle that is to respond to the issues in open debate – or in writing. Personalizing it as Malone has on his substack, accusing Peter of being elderly and implying slipping cognition on the Wells show, calling for sympathy because he is having trouble handing the debate emotionally, and filing a law suit all send a message that he would not be happy serving in public office. It is contradictory to what he said he wants. Having served in a senior position in Washington, one thing I am sure of. The slings and arrows that one takes in such a position will be much much worse than the Breggins criticisms of Malone’s public policy positions and qualifications to represent health freedom or serve in the US government.

      My advice to Dr. Malone would be to withdraw the lawsuit and rethink about whether he really wants to work in a senior government position.

      Will comment on this in Ask Catherine this week in response to several question.

      1. i don’t want to get involved in accusations against anybody, but would like to bring attention to recent discussions of the theme of controlled opposition by Dr Malone

        https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/controlled-opposition-black-propaganda?utm_source

        and here:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mDOJmX8zp0

        i met Dr Malone at a CHD event and was well impressed with him in person, as i have been by his many public interventions.

        on the subject of controlled opposition, little is known about funding sources and affiliations of certain media, most obviously Epoch Times but others as well, that have emerged out of nowhere to position themselves as influential in this debate.

  3. Regarding the missing DoD money… I spent more than 30 years tracking money for Navy agencies. We accounted down to the penny–as required by the financial higher-ups in the Navy management structure. There were definitely data errors, and there were definitely slow-to-be-fixed accounting issues with DFAS, but the problems tended to be counter-balancing. More importantly, the errors were an infinitesimal percentage of the whole. Most of my work was for the Navy R&D sector, and maybe accounting in the DoD weapons-production sector is less exacting. Um, nah. The missing DoD money is most definitely due to bad actors, not bad accounting systems and bad accountants.

    1. Fits with my experience. Internally a lot of good accountants who ran things down – and yes, errors were small.

  4. yes FTX was an op… the hidden creditors were in on it. so was gensler objective: make Bitcoin look bad.. via faux fiat shitcoinery… in order to justify more draconian regulation. Bankman Fruad will most likely be given a paid position with regulators to help with the further fight against the only crypto that actually threatens fiat power. the theft, laundering, funding of democons, was just a side gig. still waiting for solari to read The Bitcoin Standard and The Fiat Standard (Saifedean Ammous) so i can stop face palming on the crypto coverage. ps. you can’t confiscate bitcoin if used properly…ftx investors had to learn the most important bitcoin lesson the hard way….not your keys not your money

  5. Cannot judge the accuracy of the report about the cemetery in Poland, but pasted below is the view of a source in Poland, certainly biased in favor of the official sources.

    We need to remember that Bernhard of “Moon of Alabama” blog has been pushing COVID misinformation & hysteria since the very beginning, and continues to do so. Since March 2020 i can no longer regard him as trustworthy.

    https://twitter.com/OffGuardian0/status/1248291613849387011

    Bernhard also followed the lead of New York magazine in misdirection about Epstein. In short, NY mag took a kernel of truth – Virginia Roberts did depose that Epstein told her he was gathering material for blackmail – but adds – what is not at all in the affidavit – that blackmail was for the purpose of forcing johns to invest with him.

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/hedge-funders-have-some-thoughts-on-what-epstein-was-doing.html

    Bernhard took pretty much the same view:

    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/07/a-plausible-theory-about-what-jeffrey-epstein-was-doing.html

    Polish correspondent’s opinion:

    The only true information in the sent text is that authorities of city
    Olsztyn plan to create new communal (not polish or american military)
    cemetery in ‘american style’ and not all inhabitants of the city like
    this idea.

    The relation of this project to Polish mercenaries fighting in Ukraine,
    claimed by the source, is not confirmed by any serious media, even these usually critical towards the Polish government.

    The source of these informations and opinions – “Niezalezny dziennik
    polski” is not a serious and reliable medium but rather element of
    Russian propaganda.

    1. Christiopher:

      Thanks. Appreciate the information. Will be more careful re Moon of Alabama.

  6. Catherine,

    Is the Malone lawsuit and Kanye West “insanity” related? I think they are. Mr. Global appears to be using Ye as a conspiracy theory lighting rod that will be the first case of “only the mentally ill would call CBDC killswitch money”. It literally looks like he is being paraded around to suck up every legitimate criticism of Mr. Global to ultimately poison it with a psychotic break later.

Comments are closed.