Money & Markets Report: January 6, 2022

Theme: Convert how you access intelligence & do biz without online payments

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!

209 Comments

      1. “`Curiouser and curiouser!’ cried Alice.” (From Alice in Wonderland)

        I am reminded of Churchill who said about Russia, ‘It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.’.

    2. Looks to me like the global orders for vaccination are coming from Antartica….assume whomever it is there is the same force that controls the weapons from the skies.

  2. Catherine,

    I’m worried that we’re about to be given a bait and switch with the vaccination vs. testing option. There is pushback against masks and injections, but the most effective vector for brain machine interface is nasal. Do you know if there is any pushback material regarding the testing kits? I feel like this has been neglected throughout the whole scam and may blindside us if not addressed.

    1. “but the most effective vector for brain machine interface is nasal.”
      There is a link to Dr Leiber and carbon nanotubes that needs more investigation.

      1. The CDC shared some facts about sodium azide:

        Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid.
        When it is mixed with water or an acid, sodium azide changes rapidly to a toxic gas with a pungent (sharp) odor. It also changes into a toxic gas (hydrazoic acid) when it comes in contact with solid metals (for example, when it is poured into a drain pipe containing lead or copper).
        The odor of the gas may not be sharp enough, however, to give people sufficient warning of the danger.

        “Survivors of serious sodium azide poisoning may have heart and brain damage,” according to the public health agency.

        Reese shared in his report that there is a warning on the instructions saying:

        11. Do not dip the swab into the liquid reagent or other liquid before inserting the swab into the nose.

        However, who will read the instructions before they use the test kit? So, people aren’t aware of the dangerous ingredient.

        The test could be administered to young children at two or three.

        https://thetruedefender.com/breaking-abbott-binaxnow-c-19-home-test-kit-has-lethal-substances/

    3. I agree that pushing back and refusing to comply with nasal anything is essential. Will keep an eye out for pushback material on the nasal tests. If you see any, please post.

    1. Sounds to me like corporate understaffing was the problem – it is cutting into S&P profits.

      1. You were right! Fauci admitted it today. The “isolation period” was cut in half “to keep society running.” Yesterday, the CDC said the change was “motivated by science” in a written statement. Trust Science™

        https://t.me/disclosetv/6258

          1. I disagree. Government deficit spending takes first place as this drives corporate profits.

        1. I hope you are right. It crumbles a lot faster when corporate profits are eroded.

  5. Hey Catherine, This is from Ed Griffin today:

    Craig Paardekooper, a scientist at at Kingston University London, analyzed massive amounts of data from the American CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that tracks reports by the public of vaccine injuries and deaths linked to Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen/J&J Covid vaccines. He says that the the three companies are intentionally using differing formulas, instead of uniform formulas, as they have falsely presented to the public. There are over 20,200 different batches (lots) of Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen injections in total. He discovered that 1 in 200 lots contain deadly ingredients and that the risk of death or vaccine injury is about 1 in 200. Paardekooper urged people to share his videos and app ‘How Bad Is My Batch?‘ with doctors and nurses so that they may check toxicity levels of certain batches before they inject people, especially children.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/6xIYPZBkydsu/

    Here’s the app
    http://www.howbad.info

    I have no idea how to validate this info. Anybody know?

    1. AstraZeneca analysis from University Ulm in Germany:
      Gene therapy experts discover proteins
      Ulm researchers find impurities in Astrazeneca vaccine
      (impurities make up 2/3 of a bottle of AstraZeneca)

      Gentherapie-Experten entdecken Eiweiße
      Ulmer Forscher finden Verunreinigungen in Astrazeneca-Impfstoff
      STAND 28.5.2021, 9:51 Uhr

      Article with several embedded videos (German): https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/ulm/stoffe-in-astrazeneca-impfstoff-gefunden-100.html

    5. I reviewed and posted. What he describes fits with my anecdotal feedback. Although, I think the risk of vaccine injury and death in the bad batches is much higher if there was full reporting which there is not. My guess is the gist of what he is saying is dead on – and it is clear from the stats that the companies are taking turns distributing the bad batches. Looks to me like the experiments or kills are being evenly distributed for purposes of liability.

Comments are closed.