This 6-pillar curriculum teaches the basic literacy we need to be personally and financially successful and to do so in a manner in which together we evolve a culture that supports the emergence of an advanced human civilization.
Catherine responds to recent postings by Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin, Dr. Robert Malone, and Jon Rappoport as well as questions from subscribers regarding Dr. Malone’s lawsuit against the Breggins.
Well I think that the fact that he’s now suing an 86 year old man who’s apparently losing his cognitive abilities really says everything you need to know right? Such a typical reaction of narcissist – all they ever care about is their ego and reputation. If you operate with integrity, speak your truth and are working towards a common goal greater than your own personal ambition you don’t concern yourself with those who slander or criticise or even “defame” you… since your “fame” is not your primary concern to begin with. Defamation lawsuits always say more about the character of the person suing than those on the receiving end.
Even before there was any controversy about Dr. Malone, I felt uneasy about him. He came to the scene much later than all the frontline doctors, including Dr. Breggin, and all of a sudden he became omnipresent and became in his words, the “leader of medical freedom” movement. I don’t think he is a controlled opposition, but he does have narcistic traites. But, he does say the right things, and we should keep open mind about him. Regarding the “mass formation” analysis, I think the article by Whitney Webb is the best.
That was my first thought as well . . . why imply someone is not all there, yet later turn around and sue him? Seems somewhat cruel to me.
So true Natasha!
thank you Catherine. Breggin is a great hero and very sharp. Not slipping one bit.
Very well put Catherine.
Is there any way the presentation by Daniel Broudy could be clipped out to be easily shared?
Yes, D4CE is working on getting the individual presentations up on their website.
Excellent analysis Catherine. It’s like witnessing a family fight with knives when all that was needed was a calm discussion.
Excellent response to a very unfortunate development.
When one asks for Catherine to comment, one might naught expect that her comment will not be helpful. In other words, if you don’t want to hear my opinion, do not ask for it.
Well I think that the fact that he’s now suing an 86 year old man who’s apparently losing his cognitive abilities really says everything you need to know right? Such a typical reaction of narcissist – all they ever care about is their ego and reputation. If you operate with integrity, speak your truth and are working towards a common goal greater than your own personal ambition you don’t concern yourself with those who slander or criticise or even “defame” you… since your “fame” is not your primary concern to begin with. Defamation lawsuits always say more about the character of the person suing than those on the receiving end.
Even before there was any controversy about Dr. Malone, I felt uneasy about him. He came to the scene much later than all the frontline doctors, including Dr. Breggin, and all of a sudden he became omnipresent and became in his words, the “leader of medical freedom” movement. I don’t think he is a controlled opposition, but he does have narcistic traites. But, he does say the right things, and we should keep open mind about him. Regarding the “mass formation” analysis, I think the article by Whitney Webb is the best.
That was my first thought as well . . . why imply someone is not all there, yet later turn around and sue him? Seems somewhat cruel to me.
So true Natasha!
thank you Catherine. Breggin is a great hero and very sharp. Not slipping one bit.
Very well put Catherine.
Is there any way the presentation by Daniel Broudy could be clipped out to be easily shared?
Yes, D4CE is working on getting the individual presentations up on their website.
Excellent analysis Catherine. It’s like witnessing a family fight with knives when all that was needed was a calm discussion.
Excellent response to a very unfortunate development.
When one asks for Catherine to comment, one might naught expect that her comment will not be helpful. In other words, if you don’t want to hear my opinion, do not ask for it.
Download mp3 audio file
Well I think that the fact that he’s now suing an 86 year old man who’s apparently losing his cognitive abilities really says everything you need to know right? Such a typical reaction of narcissist – all they ever care about is their ego and reputation. If you operate with integrity, speak your truth and are working towards a common goal greater than your own personal ambition you don’t concern yourself with those who slander or criticise or even “defame” you… since your “fame” is not your primary concern to begin with. Defamation lawsuits always say more about the character of the person suing than those on the receiving end.
Even before there was any controversy about Dr. Malone, I felt uneasy about him. He came to the scene much later than all the frontline doctors, including Dr. Breggin, and all of a sudden he became omnipresent and became in his words, the “leader of medical freedom” movement. I don’t think he is a controlled opposition, but he does have narcistic traites. But, he does say the right things, and we should keep open mind about him. Regarding the “mass formation” analysis, I think the article by Whitney Webb is the best.
That was my first thought as well . . . why imply someone is not all there, yet later turn around and sue him? Seems somewhat cruel to me.
So true Natasha!
thank you Catherine. Breggin is a great hero and very sharp. Not slipping one bit.
Very well put Catherine.
Is there any way the presentation by Daniel Broudy could be clipped out to be easily shared?
Yes, D4CE is working on getting the individual presentations up on their website.
Excellent analysis Catherine. It’s like witnessing a family fight with knives when all that was needed was a calm discussion.
Excellent response to a very unfortunate development.
When one asks for Catherine to comment, one might naught expect that her comment will not be helpful. In other words, if you don’t want to hear my opinion, do not ask for it.