36 Comments

1. When one asks for Catherine to comment, one might naught expect that her comment will not be helpful. In other words, if you don’t want to hear my opinion, do not ask for it.

2. Excellent response to a very unfortunate development.

3. Excellent analysis Catherine. It’s like witnessing a family fight with knives when all that was needed was a calm discussion.

4. Is there any way the presentation by Daniel Broudy could be clipped out to be easily shared?

   1. Yes, D4CE is working on getting the individual presentations up on their website.

5. Very well put Catherine.

6. thank you Catherine. Breggin is a great hero and very sharp. Not slipping one bit.

7. Well I think that the fact that he’s now suing an 86 year old man who’s apparently losing his cognitive abilities really says everything you need to know right? Such a typical reaction of narcissist – all they ever care about is their ego and reputation. If you operate with integrity, speak your truth and are working towards a common goal greater than your own personal ambition you don’t concern yourself with those who slander or criticise or even “defame” you… since your “fame” is not your primary concern to begin with. Defamation lawsuits always say more about the character of the person suing than those on the receiving end.

   1. So true Natasha!

   2. That was my first thought as well . . . why imply someone is not all there, yet later turn around and sue him? Seems somewhat cruel to me.

   3. Even before there was any controversy about Dr. Malone, I felt uneasy about him. He came to the scene much later than all the frontline doctors, including Dr. Breggin, and all of a sudden he became omnipresent and became in his words, the “leader of medical freedom” movement. I don’t think he is a controlled opposition, but he does have narcistic traites. But, he does say the right things, and we should keep open mind about him. Regarding the “mass formation” analysis, I think the article by Whitney Webb is the best.

Comments are closed.