A Short Preview:

Theme: Happy Valentine’s Day!

Ask Catherine will be posted on Friday here.

Interview: Soft Mind Control: More than 100 Years of Propaganda with Michelle Stiles

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


99 Comments

  1. Something for John’s Pharmaggedon section, on Tucker Carlson’s Rumble channel is an interview entitled “Big Pharma is Lying to You Again”. It concerns “Ozempic”, a diabetes drug being used for weight loss. The first 7 minutes is enlightening. First off, it has not been approved for use in the EU, even though its maker Novo Nordisk is located there, but it is approved for use in the US by our own FDA. Secondly, soft drinks /pop / soda are allowed to be purchased with food stamps. Thirdly, for children it is OK for 10% of their diet to be sugar according to nutritional guidelines from the FDA, stated by the interviewee.
    https://rumble.com/v4azgvi-big-pharma-is-fooling-you-again-and-you-dont-even-know-it.html

    1. 15 to17 minutes discusses our Covid response and vax injury. 34 to 38 minutes discusses “why would you trust big pharma?”.

    2. Correction: the 10% sugar guidelines for children comes from the American Academy of Pediatrics, not the FDA.

  2. Sopranos clip: local mobsters vs. global corp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gsz7Gu6agA

    Log of ongoing defense against local DEW attacks, which share some technology signatures with MRIs: https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/dew/

    Until we can collectively build defenses against remote attacks, they will advance in scope and reduce in cost, expanding the range of population which can be targeted, https://search.solari.com/2018/08/26/home-solari-com-we-are-all-targeted-individuals-now-with-dr-katherine-horton/

    1. Rich thank you for posting these links, especially the first link. My sister was targeted. She is dead now. She had figured out that part of this tech was coming from a group that was in LA but eventually went to Seattle. I’ve read of a few accounts from homeless in Seattle who were experimented on.

  3. Considering migrational economics and what might underlie the current zest for them, I have come up with a few thoughts on making them, and it, work:

    1) modern history has numerous examples of opening up frontiers and letting the ensuing demand for goods, services, housing, and jobs organically see to their own purposes. Included among these examples would be the Louisiana Purchase, the interstate highway system, the Panama Canal, and the great waves of immigration.

    2) if we give out a temporary stipend to incoming migrants, it is like printing money, but only periodically, and as needed. The prepaid credit cards would only draw the money down when they are used. If these give people enough of an incentive to put down roots, they will then figure out how to carve out an existence wherever they are. Once they are entrained into the employment- and – tax system, they are as good as hooked.

    3) There are countless nearly vacant and run down areas of the United States where infrastructure exists, but there is no population to support the decaying housing. If someone was to incentivize the reconstruction of such places, for example, by homesteaders, good things would follow. There are several channels on YouTube where people go around documenting such towns. One we have found to be pretty consistent is called Joe and Nic’s Road Trip. It is full of Americana that most never see, and he gives you statistics on population makeup, crime, employment, and housing costs.

    4) Stable populations anchored to housing generally become tax bases and employer resources that can be drawn on productively. The stipend bucks would, in my opinion, be better bets in this type of program than in war-making or open-ended border mismanagement.

    While this isn’t necessarily a case where lemons were ordered, there are probably some ways to make decent lemonade from it. It doesn’t have to be civil war. The people just need to be situated where they can be industrious rather than indolent. That would mean not sending them to New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, but to sparsely populated places like rural Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, Mississippi, Texas and New Mexico. The weather is not exceptionally challenging in these areas, and the transportation and cost of land is quite reasonable. Just some ideas on the positive side.

  4. I saw a program, which I believe showed UN uniforms in a room at a US police station. As I recall, they said these extra rooms are at all police stations. I don’t remember where I saw it. Has anyone seen or heard of anything like this?

    2. Great article..
      During the sanctioning, I worked at a Bank (a WEF Partner) and the mandate was to remove Russia from SWIFT. My US co-workers were feeling so proud and patriotic. On the other hand, I was scratching my head because anyone reading about geopolitics knows the BRICS have been trying to break from SWIFT since their inception, so I asked, in a meeting, “Why are we giving Russia exactly what they want? Haven’t they been trying to break free of SWIFT, and US Banking control, for years?” Of course, crickets.

      As the author states, “I am not smarter than the U.S. intelligence community, so what does this mean?”

      Shortly thereafter the Bank had a company meeting for Women and Crypto and were encouraging women to get wallets and buy crypto. Then their USCEO retired and, of course, a Brit took the reins. Or do I mean ‘reigns’? Hmm.

Comments are closed.