A Short Preview:

Theme: The UCC Head Fake

Ask Catherine will be posted on Friday here.

Interview: 2023 Annual Wrap Up: The Magic of Water with Ulrike Granögger

Take Action

Please login to see stories, charts, and subscriber-only content.
Not a subscriber yet? You are invited to join here!


130 Comments

    1. I’d like to see Catherine and John ask him the hard questions! So far all the hosts in his interviews just sort of sit there and say omg!

    2. Suggestion: Watch the documentary “The Great Taking” for a more comprehensive view.
      I’m wondering who you trust to do the vetting?

  1. the flouride vector of the Great Poisoning and tranquilizing of the population is alive and well in the UK:
    Millions will get fluoride added to their tap water in biggest expansion of controversial scheme since the 1980s
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13059969/Millions-fluoride-added-tap-water-biggest-expansion-controversial-scheme-1980s.html

    as well as from our own CDC here in the U.S.:

    New technology could bring fluoridated water to about 19 million people in the United States.

    https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/publications/features/cwf-tablet.html

    It may not be a winnable fight yet, but it was found at the local level that the municipal was adding a dose of flouride 28% higher than “recommended”–when enough people showed up at the local meeting, they agreed to lower it. Wouldn’t have happened without the spearheading of FAN–Flouride Action Network. (And yes, can be filtered out, but most don’t, and generally not the shower or the hose bibs to garden)

  2. Regarding the China CBDC. I think you saw it for what it was: a complete bit of theatre. Of course, this was done with the UAE, which, if you visit and walk around, you realize most of the big buildings in Dubai are empty.

    I was on a VIP tour of Beijing’s top companies care of London Business School in 2019. They all have Disneyland-style shows set up on their ground floor, but none had real tech to show. Microsoft was the only company that wowed some people.

    However, we did visit the Tencent Beijing headquarters on that trip. They were trying to brag and convince us that they had created a fully digital currency with WeChat pay. However, we had several London bankers who then proceeded to ask questions about how the payments were settled, especially with other banks. They ended up admitting that it was just an account with a debit card, exactly like Apple Pay. They also ended up admitting that the China central bank had realized they were keeping a float and then forced all transactions to settle at the central bank at the end of each day.

    If they actually had a working system, wouldn’t it be more than a single big transaction? Or kick-off to a market clearing in the new currency?

    As a side note – here is some circumstantial evidence care of the guys that run the China Show on Youtube on Huahei’s cutting-edge AI. It is a year old but speaks volumes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wJRjQ_wMzA

    Also, if you need a video of what happens with the lack of financial transaction freedom, this is a good example of how this works in China. In this video, the Government turns Chinese COVID alerts to red (i.e., you cannot leave your home) after a bank collapses so people can’t go out to protest. About 3min in –

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjKGPCcY4GY

  3. Also, on the turbo cancer. It is difficult to get this in the US but easier to get in the UK as their NHS keeps good statistics.

    Here is a recent article from the Guardian – 7.6 million people awaiting treatments out of a population of about 56 million (this is just England and not all of the UK) – so about 13.5% of England’s population is currently awaiting treatment. The graph in the middle of the article does not bode well.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/aug/10/people-england-waiting-for-nhs-treatment

    But i can say this graph is likely fudged to seem better than the reality. I went to a small healthcare conference in London at the end of 2021 led by Ed Jones, who served as a policy advisor to the UK’s Health Secretary. At that time, they were discussing how the treatment backlog had a few dozen people waiting over 1 year prior to COVID-19, and this had grown to 2 years after the jab rollout. This was before anyone had heard of turbocancer, but doctors attending said they were seeing people show up with stage 3-4 cancer, and they had never seen this. Also that the backlog was going down sometimes because people simply died before they were ever treated.

    Also, if you start looking at the backlog reports by the NHS, it has some cancer data as well – the bar is pretty low. The NHS basically has only a 75% bar to let people know if they have cancer after four weeks, and they don’t even hit that bar, so how much is not even making it in? Then, the wait times and backlog show a whole system collapsing under a huge increase in sickness.

    This is likely the source material for the Guardian article above.
    https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/pressures/nhs-backlog-data-analysis

    One also has to wonder how many people are dying before the 4 weeks of getting tested. These stats all mention the referrals are urgent.

    Also of note – the UK has been very slow to release Cancer data since the jab rollout. Only preliminary data for 2021 is available. They release all kinds of other stuff right away.

    1. We do not yet know what to look for by way of new forms of cancer. A search for
      “nested spiderweb of cancer proteins” gets zero results. Maybe someone close to me is the sole recipient, but I doubt that.

  4. Re: UCC
    The relevant code of the UCC to the information in “the Great Taking,” is UCC §8-511(b) and (c). Section 511 is the last section of Article 8.
    [https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/8-511]
    These paragraphs clearly spell out Webb’s clarion call about the legal framework that’s already in place to take all securities in times of bankruptcy. 8-511(b) basically says that if you don’t hold it, then you don’t own it. If you hold the security certificate, then you actually own it; otherwise, you are an entitlement holder, with no rights to the security in case of a holding company bankruptcy.
    8-511(c) specifically details out the hierarchy of creditors to be reimbursed in a clearing company’s bankruptcy: the claim of the creditor to the clearing company has priority over the claims of entitlement holders.

    This code is echoed in state UCC codes, like in Colorado: CO Code §4-8-511 [https://law.justia.com/codes/colorado/2022/title-4/article-8/part-5/section-4-8-511/] This website give detailed explanations of the various paragraphs in the statute, as well as clarifying examples.

    1. For us lay people this means Webb is correct we can have our securities taken?

      And when John repeatedly says we do not have the rule of law, who says they will follow the law?

      And terms and conditions…..who knows to what I have agreed.

      Seems to me getting out of the markets and stop engaging the enemy assuming the law or anything else is on your side makes more sense.

      Also, I would like your opinion on “the hidden secrets of money” by Maloney

      1. I believe in getting out of Mr. Global’s plunder economy stocks and getting into good stocks of companies that are very productive. All asset classes now range from those aspects which aid Mr. Global’s control and those that diversify away from Mr. Global. That is why you have to be careful and not get played by the all good, all bad approach.

        1. Any thoughts on oil stocks these days, like Exxon and Chevron? My thoughts are that we all want to maintain our combustion engines instead of going the EV route, so does it make sense to support the gas companies?

  5. re: “Their people have not been poisoned.”

    Wholly untrue. Sputnik V, an Astra Zeneca knock-off, was mandated throughout the country and many took the jab. Many Russians died and many more have been injured. RU has no VAERS equivalent so this is difficult to prove, but yeah, Russians were harmed too. Riley Waggaman, an American living in Russia, has been reporting on this since the beginning. He publishes at edwardslavsquat.substack.com.

    This is not to say that their food supply has been poisoned as has ours. I don’t have hard info about this. Perhaps they have escaped the worst the west has to offer.

    BTW, the Russian economy ain’t doing all that well for the average Ivan or Natasha. I have a friend who lives and works in their Detroit. This fine man, a thirty-year veteran engineer in their automotive manufacturing industry, cannot afford his own automobile. I am embarrassed to report his salary so I won’t. The oligarchs at the top are doing well. Ordinary peeps, not so much.

    1. And hundreds, if not thousands now, of Russians are walking away to live in tiny communities called Kin’s Domains. This is the Ringing Cedars Movement, and it is the most hopeful social action on the planet. The RC movement takes the people back to nature, their land, and a state of happiness and health. Something the Russians have had snatched away from them for centuries. (www.ringingcedarsofrussia.org)

      1. Just met with a wonderful subscriber who is using this design to build an ecovillage in Arizona.

  6. The “Health & Freedom” Movement is greatly compromised.Many popular personalities are associated with the Wellness Co. It seems at best they are unloading old supplement/medications for pharma. Sadly, they are tied to the UN, Blackwater, nanotech, curious dealings in the Caribbean and more.They may have some good info/good guests, but it is unlikely they are telling the whole truth/are greatly censored.Many personalities have been made aware of these issues and just double down/do nothing.

        1. Recently she’s been implying that the CV injection-injured are bots or an AI construction. I find her offensive.

          1. She does very thorough research and ‘dot connecting’ but then she was a strong proponent of Q and blamed it on ‘hopeium.’ Not sure about her. But then, I was duped by Obama the first time, so there’s that…

          2. As a general rule, we do not post Amazing Polly. Because there are occasional tidbits, if we do the link goes in UAQ

        2. Amazing Polly is one of my bedrocks so I’m biased:)). I was sent a link to her Youtube channel in 2020 and I thought what a weird name for a YT channel.
          And then she educated me on the internecine connections between the huge number of global health organizations – and her attention to detail was AMAZING!! And then she was booted off Youtube… so, there’s that.

Comments are closed.