135 Comments

1. Catherine and John,
   just yesterday I read on alternative media that defense secretary Lloyd Austin had been killed in a missile strike in Kiev, Ukraine. The information comes from a Russian blogger who had been told by FSB. FSB knew where Lloyd Austin was while meeting with Ukrainian military officials. About 20 missiles hit the building where he met. FSB told this blogger that nothing in this building could have survived this missile strike. Lloyd Austin, apparently is dead.
   Now, if this is Russian propaganda I don’t know but it would explain his disappearance, also the strange circumstances around it. His deputy secretary not knowing anything, Joe Biden not knowing anything and so forth. Apparently Lloyd Austin had been to Ukraine several times last year, so it is possible that FSB had expected him. Best regards, Christian

   1. If true, wouldn’t this be worse than any hypothetical attacks (false or otherwise) on naval assets, which were previously discussed on M&M as potential justification for WW-scale conflict?

      If true, given the level of global surveillance by multiple factions, which national and global factions could have prevented this class of incident, but chose to stand down?

      If not true, what are some potential motivations for pushing this scenario early in a year with billions of people going to election polls?

      If one side is already winning by stalemate, with funding disappearing for their opponents, how would they benefit from an escalation that could justify new opposition?

   2. If this is true, Christian, it’s quite a psyop. The media would therefore have to create a double recuperating at the Walter Reade Hospital.
      Here is a presentation of Austin’s post-illness public appearance January 15.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHIm4k4N5XY

2. Re nonprofits (around minute 24:00), ya’ll are spot on that tons of government money funnels to nonprofits, and at all levels (federal, state and county).

   I looked into nonprofits a bit more after I worked for two (and I will not work for nonprofits again). I was surprised to learn things like:

   -many nonprofits simply pop up and exist solely because of a specific government fund that was passed into law (and the founders of these nonprofits are sometimes who lobbied for the law).

   -nonprofits are burdened with government reporting requirements — many have to spend some of the funds to hire staff just to do all the reporting.

   -some nonprofits have a monopoly in a particular area, like Catholic Charities being (still is?) the largest immigration contractor for the US federal governement, and even has a whole lobbying department/office in Washington DC. (I am NOT picking on Catholics — this is just an example!)

   I am so much more particular about any nonprofits I donate to!

3. I recently borrowed a DVD from my local public library of the movie “Enchanted April” starring Jim Broadbent. It’s a cute movie. It concerns 2 ladies in 1920’s England who answer an ad in the newspaper to rent a castle in Italy for the month of April. But just below that is an ad for a hotel in Davos, Switzerland. No other ads are fully visible, nor are any articles along side the ad. Is this some sort of “product placement” or subliminal suggestion I wonder to make us think the goings-on in Davos are OK?

4. 100% spot on about Elon Musk. A Pied Piper. Similar to Max Keiser with BotCoin (that was a typo but I think I like BotCoin better) and Trump with theVaxx.

5. Remember when they elect a psychopath like Newsom and possibly flip the House and Senate because of feelings like Catherine’s, that I understand as legitimate, you deserve what you get AND MORE. Nobody I know is saying Trump is going affect massive change but I will take him over the other. It’s a small difference between a very strong value system developed thru Christian values and idealistic views that are essentially assisted political suicide. It’s politics and you have to go with what you think will be a better outcome no matter the degree in which you have issues. I did not take the poison jab or anything that the federal government was pushing. I can think for myself which seems to be a diminishing trait these days. Catherine admires RFK Jr’s. few stances that are very admirable but he is 90% a far left acolyte. The longer his candidacy goes the more incompetent a politician he becomes. So if you can sleep well at night knowing you voted your personal value system you may find that enabled the outcome to bust your door down at night and drag you out of your peaceful slumber. If I was waiting for a candidate on the federal level to exhibit most of the qualities and virtues I was taught I would have never voted for 55 years. DJT could be knowingly or unknowingly the greatest political psy-op in history but I’ll take him, good or bad. The alternative, I guarantee, is the end of the ability to stop or at least block the ongoing insanity. CAF’s fight for local election sovereignty is the dead solid perfect way to go. I just do not want the Feds given more tyrannical power. Just sayin’.

   1. We need to move beyond simplistic good/bad dichotomies, e.g. look closely for multiple shades of the color purple (red+blue royal uniparty disclosure for karmic we-warned-you-so-its-not-our-fault insurance) in the background of events and videos by speakers.

      What could work in an advanced civilization would be some kind of “coming clean” disclosure and forgiveness ceremony as discussed previously on Solari, to remove outsider leverage and create new covenants between leaders and those they represent.

      Let’s remember what happened to the handful of global politicians (RIP) who spoke out overtly in 2020. Or the politician thanking those “who brought the rain”. Those were from relatively small players on the global stage.

      Solari has previously covered the direction of weapons (“pointing outward or inward?”) wielded by those who protect US leaders. Who is going to protect our imaginary hypothetical “perfect” leaders when prior public examples do not bode well for future candidates?

      The one saving grace is that public opinion still matters, otherwise there would not be huge ongoing investments in manipulation of the public. If so, we can hold all candidates to the highest standards of accountability, despite their past(s) and undeclared allegiances, rather than giving anyone a blank check of acceptance.

6. Greetings and thanks.

   Does anyone else get a tingling feeling when a news story uses the number 33?

   And given the status of deep flakes and cloning, difficult to tell if anyone is real these days. ?

   1. I think there is a lot of “coded” language and numbers used for “messaging” in the MSM dialogue. Build Back Better (666, bbb, which is in WEF logo), Great Reset, Private-Public Partnership, Stakeholders, Global Warming, which changed to Climate Change, SMART, etc.
      If you listen to them fall, and fawn, over themselves at Event 201 one can clearly see they have their own terminology.

      1. Huge mistake to buy in to their languaging- re- frame and do not accept their premises.

         1. Who said anyone ‘buys into it?’ I’m just noting that it is there.
            I do re-frame. And suggest others re-frame. Such as the one that irks me the most: anti-war!
            My suggestion: PRO-PEACE.

            1. Imagine: There are no such thing as “war crimes.” The very nature of war is that all rules are off.

7. Dear Catherine
   I am looking forward to hearing you welcome back Dr Richard Werner on Solari.
   Have a good and safe trip home. I hope your check-in goes better than it did on your trip to Milano.

Comments are closed.