Short Preview

This Week at Solari

Ask Catherine

Solari Interview

Music of the Week

Movie of the Week

Hero of the Week

Pushback of the Week

Solari’s weekly Money & Markets reports are hosted by Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus. Catherine and John discuss the latest financial and geopolitical news—each week summarized by an evocative theme—and monitor significant trends in areas such as “Fed Watch,” “Space, Military, and Global Turf Wars,” “Hey Robot,” and “Pharmageddon.” They also track and celebrate noteworthy pushback around the world. Money & Markets is published on Thursday evenings, with the exception of the last week of the month. Subscribers can access Money & Markets in either audio or video formats (both downloadable).

Already a subscriber? Log in
New to the Solari Report? Check out our Welcome Page
Not a subscriber yet? Subscribe now

With a Solari Report subscription, you get access to:

  • ✔ The popular and informative Money & Markets show co-hosted by Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus
  • ✔ Weekly interviews with top guests, and quarterly deep dives into major trends affecting you day-to-day
  • ✔ Aggregation of the most relevant news stories
  • ✔ Subscriber-only events and a digital platform to connect with other subscribers

78 Comments

  1. Any comment on recent rumors about collapse of banking system in Cuba?

    1. I asked our News Trends and Stories editor to look for confirmation.

      1. There’s so many stories coming out it’s hard to keep track. It’s not all bad though!
        A new report highlights how *both* of the major proxy advisory firms, ISS & Glass Lewis, are advising investors to block CEO Larry Fink’s compensation package, citing a “disconnect” between pay and performance, in the midst of ESG-induced turmoil. Many investors are, reportedly, expected to follow the advice, with some even calling for the role of CEO and Board Chair to be split — which would effectively strip Fink of one of the two roles.
        https://www.barrons.com/articles/blackrock-larry-fink-salary-shareholder-meeting-b6804974

  3. Catherine, what do you make of the shooting at Slowakian Prime Minister Robert Fico today? As far as I know he opposed all or some measures by global elites. He was (lately) good friend of and cooperated with Orban Victor of Hungary. Both of them opposed Russian sanctions, the war efforts by the west, etc. Basically, he may have been against globalists´ interests. My best take right now is that this was some intelligence agency or contractor work….but let’s see.

    1. They oppose using Article 5 engineering at NATO to start World War III. Also refused to send aid to Ukraine. Just notified WHO they are voting against the IHR Amendments and the Treaty. Traditionally assassinations such as this are arranged though military-intelligence or NATO.

      2. My question is who approved it? I’d suppose someone in the EC Commission, but maybe it was someone in the Intelligence Community.

  4. It is hard to believe they (192 nations) are voting to turn all power over the entire whole of humanity in terms of health, welfare, information control including ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in a few weeks time (I think the global vote is on the 22nd of May). Without the legal protections of Florida and Oklahoma (I think) that declare they will not abide by WHO authority as it undermines national sovereignty and the US Constitution…we will all fall under this new global law, asset seizure and food/wealth transfer. It is interesting that they appear to have linked ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ together under an ‘illness’ that has to be sort of liquidated under this new ‘global pandemic treaty’ that emphasizes ‘equity’ and ‘diversity’ as a matter of global public health as well as the need to control the information as if it was a virus itself and ‘liquidate’ the carriers of both as well as ceding all farming, food and resources to WHO control. Soviet starvation programs for the USA…prepare yourself.

    https://www.who.int/teams/ihr/working-group-on-amendments-to-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)

    WHO Makes Key Concessions Ahead of Pandemic Treaty Vote
    https://archive.ph/eGMYe

    1. The WHO is bluffing. They say they have the votes and they don’t. We need to double down on all efforts and make sure this monster is destroyed once and for all.

      1. Amen. You know, one of the strangest things is that the goals themselves are not horrible when you look at them but rather it is the implementation (via force/enslavement and control rather than service to Life and to Humanity) of them that is horrific beyond comprehension. Do I want to remove people off their land? No way! But do I want wildlife corridors, transnational hiking/biking/horseback riding or wild and natural space for wildlife preserved (Agenda 2030 basically huge natural parks all over the USA/internationally)? Absolutely, I love natural parks and wild spaces (I escape to them whenever I can now). I live semi-rural and feel that more ‘wilding’ of domestic livestock would actually make a healthier life that was higher quality and eventual superior product. Could we accommodate the wild/wilderness without ripping people from their traditional lifestyle and totally obliterating thousands of years of generational and foundational knowledge for the very implementation of civilization? Absolutely, through education and assistance and showing people things like permaculture principles and the holistic science of livestock management. After all, cattle are a natural and fundamental part of this world (not ‘gas emitters’) and a foundational part of the Americas as bison used to dominate all of the plains (they are certainly a more natural part of the ecosystem than the parasitic class). Just saying that it is too bad they are psychopaths and parasites because the underlying ideas aren’t that bad if they were just done for the welfare of humanity and animals rather than for its subjugation, murder and destruction.

        1. Agree that many of the stated goals are not bad, even beneficial, on their face. Unfortunately, the WHO’s framing of them as such is why people who do not understand the underlying agenda support them.

        2. Essential to see it in context. No caring or concern for the carbon footprint of F-35 fighter planes – which has frightening amounts of emissions.
          Debt is a problem – but not the fact that the debt proceeds were stolen. It is the absence of context that often makes what sounds OK truly evil.

          1. Agree and another thing they never mention is the energy used to surveil us and store all that information.

          2. Your comment reminds me of the energy needed for things like Bitcoin (the fiats fiat currency) as well. The energy consumption is supposed to be astronomical. But truthfully I have never considered how much energy it would take to track and trace humanity…an astonishing thing to think on.
            The AI search engines answer: “However, we can gather some information that might be useful in answering this question.
            According to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index, Bitcoin mining consumes 0.62% of the entire world’s electricity consumption as of May 2024.
            Another snippet suggests that 1 billion people around the world use cryptocurrencies, which includes Bitcoin. However, this number is not specific to Bitcoin alone.”
            I would guess that at least 50% of the worlds energy consumption goes into data, tracking and tracing people at this point…so it becomes an imperative to butcher most of humanity in order to ‘track them’ (per Harari) and do whatever else the psychopaths want.
            Remember that saying, “You are the carbon they want to eliminate.” Well, based on these stats, they simply CAN’T do what they want with this many humans alive not even murdering half of us would allow them to fulfill their agenda of total unmitigated control. They are certainly going to murder almost all, if not all of us which, I suppose they have been pretty clear about to this point.

        3. As strange as it may seem at first glance, wildlife corridores, state or national parks, land trusts and conservation easements are often just another form of governmental taking. While there are situations where state or national parks may have stopped development, during my lifetime, and in the communities I have lived in, I have more often experienced them used to take land. For me, these are all buzzwords, and when they are used, a closer investigation is warranted.

          1. Truth. I still have these romantic ideas in my head about land conservation that have not proved to be true at all IRL experience now that you mention it and when I think about it critically.

      1. Interesting. Thank you for that link. Most people do not consider Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S.2 (1866) which is the current legal standard for all legislature in the USA in all of these unconstitutional edicts either:
        “Neither the legislature nor any executive or judicial officer may disregard the provisions of the Constitution in case of an emergency.”
        It continues by stating:
        “Section 98: therefore, ANYONE who declares the suspension of constitutionally guaranteed rights (to freely travel, peacefully assemble, earn a living, freely worship, etc.) and attempts to enforce such suspension within the 50 independent sovereign, continental United States of America is making war against out Constitution(s) and, therefore, we the people. They violate their Constitutional oath and, thus immediately forfeit their office and authority and their proclamations may be disregarded with impunity and that means ANYONE; even the governor and President.”

        1. Thank you for added clarity. 

          My real world experience is that “they “ simply interpret every law in a way that is beneficial to them. Then ignore or violate everything else that can’t be twisted beyond recognition. 

          And then the courts agree with them. And then the media endlessly repeats it.

  5. Catherine,
    I’ve received three subscription confirmation e-mails in the past two weeks.
    Just letting you know in case there’s a glitch. I clicked on the first one, but I’m now ignoring them.

    1. As we know, find a sense of amusement in such displays, it helps in perspective.

    2. As nefarious as the symbolism attempts to be, Charles does not look as good as the portrait.

    3. Have you seen the mirrored images going around? Even creepier. Complete with actual demons.

      1. I couldn’t find anything like that. Any suggestions for search terms?

Comments are closed.