Related reading

7 Comments

  1. Yesterday, I saw an NHS poster in the window of my local pharmacy advertising “free” flu shots for over 50s. My first impulse was “mmmm, yes”, immediately followed by “oh my God, nooooo” and finally “There are subliminals in that poster, because I categorically disagree with everything about the overt content and there’s no other reason I can imagine for that first impulse”.
    Nina talking about mind control tech reminded me.

  3. Jennifer,

    Thank-you (I totally agree). ?

    Hegelian democide is to be corrected—via a likened approach – failure to execute accordingly is sanctimonious hypocrisy.

  4. Prof. Dr. Mattias Desmet: “Continue to speak out. If other voices are available in the public space, then the mass hypnosis will be disturbed.”

    ‘Continue to speak out’

    (easy for me as a westfrisian, not for Germans)

  5. There is a great desire to remove the Idea of the Individual from our consciousness, to supplant the Idea of the Individual with a group consciousness, a gestalt, and finally a mass consciousness, so that no one feels like a Me, everyone feels like a We.

    The word mass-formation is a mind weapon, an attack on your Idea of Yourself as an Individual. Every time you repeat the word you are strengthening that self annihilating wave in the field. Yes we have to present an alternate wave to counter these anti human thought waves/mind viruses but we also have to be aware that “where thought goes, energy flows”.

    When we seek to educate ourselves and others about these powerful thought weapons, we often make those concepts stronger because we are giving our energy to what is wrong about their concept and are presenting few and/or weak alternatives, so in essence we have only given their idea our energy and time without really slowing their roll that much.

    I don’t claim to have the perfect formula for doing that, but I know it is important to strengthen the Idea of the Individual rather than Fight the Idea of Mass Formation.

    Sorry and respectfully, Dr. Breggin but I also disagree about letting people at the bottom off the hook. Those people were the marching army of Gates and Co. Without their work, the plan would have flopped. I’m not saying “off with their heads” but I am saying that everyone has to be held accountable to some degree; we cannot absolve or forgive except as relates to our own personal situation – I cannot forgive on your behalf, and you cannot forgive on behalf of anyone outside yourself…

    1. Excellent points, Jennifer. Thanks. Ideas on how to best promote the power of the individual are always welcome.

    2. Hi Jennifer,

      I like your comments very much. I think there is an opportunity to move forward from where we are now. Let me explain:
      1. If one asks for an amnesty there is a realization of guilt – that is an important starting point
      2. Amnesty in itself will not change anything because it lets the people get away with their crimes / faults and there is no justice, nor a psychological / spiritual development of the individuals involved. So the question is what process should one go through?
      3. I believe there is scope in Truth & Reconciliation – the one cannot go without the other. How that might be realized is another we should think about carefully. It might have a different form for the top-people who could also face criminal charges, and (i agree with you) a different form for the lower cooperators. All perpetrators should move through a process of truth about ‘what’ they got out of it and ‘why’ they did it.
      4. Being an educator myself I resonated strongly with the (short) discussion on education / critical thinking. At our school we actually go through a process with students when bad things happen, because then there is context for otherwise abstract items like ethics. The same for critical thinking – you need to discuss a topic that people actually care about, otherwise it is just an exercise in rhetoric.

Comments are closed.