“”A lie keeps growing and growing until it’s as plain as the nose on your face.”

I keep getting e-mails that militia are on the rise in America. I don’t believe a word of it. There are a lot of Americans upset about lawlessness and criminality on the part of their government. They are also afraid that the government and a variety of private interests might hurt them. Which is why some of them are buying guns and ammunition. History indicates this is a wise thing to do.

On another front in the divide and conquer effort as part of the ongoing “war on all of us,” folks trying to bring transparency to what is really going are being branded as “conspiracy theorists.” In fact, with $12 -14 trillion now handed out to the banks in little more than a year, financial coup d’ etat is now very far from theory.

I am surprised to hear these particular tactics. They were used quite successfully by the government and corporate media in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Having become stale, they were replaced by the “terrorist’ spin. If that has now failed as well, I wonder if someone is not running through the oldies but goodies disinformation manuals looking for something that will resonate.

There are also reports of anger at town hall meetings. I have not published any of them because I am concerned that some or all of them are staged. If most Americans understood the amount of money spent on manipulation of opinion in communities and in the media, they would simply not believe it. Most Americans want to have a serious dialogue with their representatives at town hall meetings. Disruption and anger destroys their chance to do so.

I once commented on the enormity of the invisible control tactics that may well be the largest job program in America. It is worth revisiting. (Click here)

12 Comments

  1. The only solution is for the public to see the lies, to remove these people from the centers of control, and to once again allow the public to leverage our nations vast inherent wealth to live prosperous lives. What happened to the small business general practitioner, who served families and the community? That worked very well, so why did we allow the government to step-in and screw it all up? Seems to me the first step is to push gov’t back out of our medical industry… that’s a step in the right direction.

    Every other direction is a trap!

  2. @Guy,

    The entire discussion is based on lies. There is no scarcity, it is a Simulacrum (see Baudrillard).

    We have unimaginable wealth in this country. We don’t need healthcare systems run by insurance companies, large cooperatives or anything else. The premise is false, and the supplied solutions are designed to manage humanity, not benefit it.

    I’m more than disturbing that anyone would take this entire conversation seriously, let alone have no problem with government managed decisions over human life. Have we lost all grasp on our country’s ideals and our roots? What did our forefathers fight so hard for, what was this 200+ year struggle about, so we can grant all decision making authority to panels of psychopathic “experts” controlled by unseen actors of enormous wealth?

    Please read the book They Thought they Were Free by Milton Mayer, it is about the tremendous guilt everyday Germans felt after WWII… for not standing up and noticing what was going on. This is a move toward BNW (Brave New World), as decided by some self-selected group of “insiders.” It is imperative that you do not be deceived into Bill Joys’ “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us” scenario, which is precisely where this is designed to take us.

    PS. While I don’t have the specific citations, I hope people realize that this is the 3rd Reich healthcare plan raised from the dead. The stuff they’re including in the legislation is not new.

  3. @Bert.

    You have addressed people over 65 and a potential scenario which – given the state of an empire which has stretched itself thin – could very well have to make decisions as to who gets healthcare and what kind. That is a valid argument in my opinion. What about people under 65 who have lost their job’s private healthcare insurance policy and in the state of the economy cannot find work with adequate health care coverage? If healthcare legislation is not passed, what happens to them? I understand that a real solution would require a revolution in terms of our own culture, but in the meantime what about the realist aspect of all this. We know that revolutionary change is not going to happen in this society for the better with people dependent on the “system” for their needs – so we are unfortunately stuck in this discourse and in the real world there are people without needs being met through no fault of their own.

    What say you?

  5. @Guy,

    I do not view this as a healthcare initiative, but a people management one. We’re talking about people over 65 (the specific age might be incorrect) having to visit a social worker before being able to visit a doctor. The social worker will then make the decision if the patient can visit a doctor or not. In the case of terminal illness, the social worker will make the decision on treatment, hospice, or nothing based upon the needs of “society.”

    This is all about Brave New World.

Comments are closed.