A Short Preview:
Full Interview – Stop the Greater Taking with Bobbie Anne Cox:

Listen to the MP3 audio file
Transcript:
Read the PDF of: Stop the Greater Taking
with Bobbie Anne Cox Interview
“We need all hands on deck for this monumental, and historic movement! Sitting back and watching the show, thinking ‘Someone else will do it for us. Some lawyers. Some politicians. Some knight in shining armor…’ Well, I am one of those ‘some lawyers’ and I am telling you, I/we cannot do it alone!”
~ Bobbie Anne Cox
By Catherine Austin Fitts
This week, we welcome New York attorney Bobbie Anne Cox to the Solari Report to discuss her valiant legal pushback against government overreach since 2020. Cox is also our Hero of the Week.
An attorney with 25 years’ experience, first at a large Manhattan law firm and then as head of her own firm, Cox specialized in real estate law, developing a deep understanding of property rights and infringements thereon. When the CDC, a public health agency, stepped outside its jurisdiction to declare a nationwide eviction moratorium in 2020, Cox’s property law expertise immediately allowed her to recognize the CDC orders as a real estate grab and attack on mom-and-pop landlords.
However, Cox has become most widely known for Borello v. Hochul, a lawsuit filed after New York’s Health Commissioner adopted an alarmingly unconstitutional regulation, “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” (Rule 2.13) that allows the governor to “illegally lock people up at a whim” without due process. Representing State Senator George Borello and two Assemblymen, Cox sued Governor Kathy Hochul and the Department of Health and won, with the judge striking the rule down as “null, void, and unenforceable.” Unfortunately, Gov. Hochul has appealed, and Attorney Cox is now fighting the case in the Court of Appeals.
Although the quarantine lawsuit has been unfolding in the state of New York, it has major implications for all of us. New York is the center of the U.S. financial system and home to the New York Fed, the depository for the U.S. government. This quarantine regulation can be weaponized against any person or family of a person who refuses to help institute the control grid. If your assets are managed by people in New York, understand the powers this regulation gives to the state to control those assets as well as the state’s residents and their property.
Those interested in financially supporting Cox’s legal efforts can donate directly at her website; for larger donations, the Foundation for Constitutional Preservation & Advancement is also accepting donations on her behalf.
Related:
Attorney Bobbie Anne Cox… Knowledge is power! (Substack)
Foundation for Constitutional Preservation & Advancement
Appeal Planned After New York Supreme Court Reinstates “Quarantine Camp” Regulation
Login to listen to the full interview and enjoy all that the Solari Report offers.
Not a subscriber yet? You’re invited! Click here to learn more and join this unique network.
Is there any update on this case?
Bobbie just put one out on her substack. I posted to News Trends and Stories.
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Wonderful interview. Thank you!
Have no access to this Greater Taking for some reason- what’s wrong???
…never had a problem before!!
Looks like one of our servers ran into a capacity problem last night. Should be working now. Deepest apologies. This is the first time it has happened.
An insidious version of this happening in California is being done now through law.
California established “CARE courts” in 2022. This allows anybody to refer a person they think is psychologically disturbed to a court and be forced to be examined by a court psychologist and then be put through a maze of mandatory court proceedings. A possible end result of a person not complying is that the court can order conservatorship – which takes away all rights. They have a bunch of PR claiming this is all “voluntary,” but they don’t say who it is voluntary for – hard to see a court subpoena as voluntary for people being dragged into it.
https://calmatters.org/housing/2022/09/california-lawmakers-approved-care-court-what-comes-next/
Then Prop 1, which recently passed, allows in its many pages for new locked mental facilities to be built in California. It seems fraud was likely being heavily used, as the decision is supposedly being made in all the mail-in ballots. It also pulls funding for local-level homeless programs and sends it to the state. They were pitching it as helping veterans. If you read the text of Prop 1, it doesn’t read as law but a lot of it reads as a McKinsey report and then a whole lot more of murky definitions with all kinds of language that makes for bad law. It also is 69 printed pages so nearly impossible for an average person to figure out.
Even the now woke ACLU is opposed to this and has a decent summary
https://www.aclunc.org/blog/don-t-be-fooled-proposition-1-s-false-promises
The text of Prop 1
https://vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2024/primary/pdf/topl.pdf
sharring