I believe one of the goals of the swine flu vaccine is depopulation. Perhaps it is the goal of a swine flu epidemic as well, whether bio-warfare or hype around a flu season.
These days, I keep remembering my sense of urgency leaving the Bush Administration in 1991. We had to do something to turn around the economy and gather real assets behind retirement plans and the social safety net. If not, Americans could find themselves deeply out on a limb. I felt my family and friends were in danger. They did not share my concern. They had a deep faith in the system.
As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.
Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion. I was a portfolio strategist used to looking at numbers from a very high level. Those around me could not fathom how all the different threads I was integrating could lead to such a conclusion. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical result.
A year later, in 1999, a very capable investment and portfolio strategist asked me if he could come have a private lunch with me in Washington. We sat in a posh restaurant across from the Capitol. He said quietly that he had calculated out where the derivatives and debt bubble combined with globalization were going. The only logical conclusion he could reach was that significant depopulation was going to occur. He said his estimates led to an approximate population of 500 million. I said very quietly, “that’s my estimate too.” I will never forget the look of sadness that crossed his face. I was amazed to find someone else who understood.
It turns out that we were not alone. Sir James Goldsmith had warned of the consequences of GATT in 1994. He described the process under way, involving the loss of land and livelihood for 3 billion people, “…This is the establishment against the rest of society.” Voices were rising around the planet as hardships exploded from global economic warfare and industrialization of agriculture.
As trillions of dollars were shifted out of America by legal and illegal means to reinvest in Asia and emerging markets and to build a global military empire, we left a sovereign nation economic model behind. Finally, the expense and corruption of empire resulted in bailouts of $12-14 trillion, delivering a new financial war chest to the people leading the financial engineering. Now we have exploding unemployment, an exploding federal deficit, an Inspector General for the TARP bailout program predicting that the ultimate bailout cost could rise to $23.7 trillion and a Congressional Budget Director who is concluding that we can no longer afford the social safety net.
That is, unless you change the actuarial assumptions in the budget – like life expectancy. Lowering immune systems and increasing toxicity levels combined with poor food, water and terrorizing stress will help do the trick. Review the history of vaccines rushed into production without proper testing and peer review – it is clear about the potential side effects. In addition, a plague can so frighten and help control people that they will accept the end of their current benefits (and the resulting implications to life expectancy) without objection. And a plague with proper planning can be highly profitable. Whatever the truth of what swine flu and related vaccines are, it can be used as a way to keep control in a situation that is quickly shifting out of control.
In short, an epidemic can be used to offset the inflation of capital with increasing deflation of the value and income of labor and continual demand destruction. It is a great deal of time and money spent on something that will not help build a real economy. The disinformation and control opportunities are profound. They keep the slow burn going. It is the next, meaner face of “the establishment against the rest of society.”
That’s what I believe. I am not an expert. I have no case worth presenting in a court of law. There are hundreds of hours of research on the swine flu and related vaccines that I have not done and I am not going to do. It is just what I believe, listening to the people I respect, and in no small part because if you map out all the financial ecosystems around the issue and people and incentives involved, it seems to me to be the logical conclusion.
Now, if this sounds ludicrous to you, it may be because you do not appreciate how dark the culture has become that is now in charge. Do you have any idea how impossibly frustrating it is to manage a highly centralized system in which the vast majority of people lack any responsibility to ensure that the whole thing works? Everyone wants their free lunch and there are no real markets or democracy to force accountability or a shared intelligence. Force works. Force has increasingly become the way to achieve most everything. Using force is a lot easier that living with rising risk and the costs of subsidizing an aging population.
So the question for you and me is “what do we do?” Are we going to take a vaccine? Are we going to allow our children to be vaccinated? Will we have a choice? How can we organize to make sure that we do? Is self-quarantine a practical option? How would we prepare for it?
What you believe is your responsibility. The time has come to build time into Summer schedules to research options, discuss them with those you trust and make informed decisions about what you believe and what actions you intend to take under a variety of scenarios.
I don’t have the answers yet. Somehow, I believe we can find them together. And while we do, let’s remember to pray for the love of humanity to be rekindled and nourished in each and every heart.
A quote from writer Robert Fisk “only this year, I interviewed Hartan, a 101-year-old blind Armenian in an old people’s home in East Beruit. who remembered how, in the Syrian desert in 1915, his mother pleaded with Turks not to rape her 18 year old daughter – Hartan’s sister ‘as she begged them not to take my sister they beat her to death’ Hartun recalled. ‘I remember her dying, shouting Hartun, Hartun, Hartun over and over. When she was dead they took my sister away on a horse. I never saw her again’ Hartun after years of bitterness and longing for revenge has overcome with what he called ‘my christian belief’ and decided to abandaon the notion of vengeance. ‘when the Turkish earthquake killed so many people last year’ he told me ‘I prayed for the poor Turkish people'”
The victory over this evil onslaught will come through the power of prayer. That’s the one thing they have no weapon against and they will stand vexed and confounded to God’s power just as we are vexed and confounded trying to sort it all out.
Catherine I have to agree with Northern Target…I do understand violence isn’t the solution, but how does a person deal with the current situation when peaceful protest just aren’t working? Regardless of the many phone calls, letters and emails that are being sent to politicians to oppose and express concern for the bills being pushed through Congress, they just don’t seem to care how we – the people – feel. I have a 2 yr. old daughter that I have constantly been thinking about because she hasn’t really lived and for her life to be cut short because (as Northern Target said very well) someone, somewhere decided she is expendable…it is unbearable! Now imagine all the innocent children around the world!!! How can a caring human-being sit around peacefully when mass murder, on a global scale, will be committed? Is that so peaceful?
This is a very good article, fairly thought out but still very speculative in nature. Now, I’m just a housewife with a high school education. I never went to college and I’m not an expert on anything…except changing a diaper.
It seems to me that this swine flue is a snake oil salesman sales pitch. Ya know what I mean. Like in the old west when a town got hit with cholera and some salesman came riding into town with a cure all. Our cure all is government run health care. If the public thinks there is a “pandemic” they are more likely to buy the government snake oil called “Obamacare.”
As to depopulation. I agree that there is a depopulation ideal running through the minds of the elite. But to me a flue pandemic wouldn’t be the best way to take out half or more of the world’s population. Where is the most numbers concentrated? India and China each with over and billion.
The USA is the 3rd most populated with 350 million. So, if I was a made, evil global elitist I would want to reduce the population in the countries with the most people: India and China. China has a one child policy and that has been a horrific failure. India is Hindu.
Now, we look at the USA. The USA consumes 25% of the world’s resources and only has 350 million people. We are currently occupying 2 countries and are about to go into a 3rd. If I wanted to destroy the lives of half the people in India and China I would first wipe out the USA’s technology. The USA is a huge crop and seed producer. Without technology we wouldn’t be able to feed the people in the USA alone much less the rest of the world.
Taking out our technology could only be accomplished by 2 things. A solar flare or a nuclear detonation at 300 miles above the country. This would wipe out all internet, banking and electric. It would force the USA into 1900 living in the blink of an eye.
Without modern technology we cannot feed everyone. We will stop working, cars will stall in the middle of highway. Gas will be rationed, planes will not fly and electric lines would fry. Imagine no TV, no phone, no internet, no food in the stores, you car not working, life as well know it will cease to exist.
This threat is very real. The military has been “Hardening” their equipment against such an attack. The civilian infrastructure is totally exposed and will fail. In 2005 congress held a report on an EMP attack. By their own estimates one nuclear weapon could kill half the people in the USA alone by wiping out our civilian technology.
In my sick and twisted mind, if I wanted to take out half the world’s population I would simply take away the technology. Without it…we’re done.
I have seen on at least two sources that there may be some kind of “ID bracelet” used to identify those who have taken the shot(s). Without which, one may be hauled off to a quarrantine camp. I do not know if either of those items are accurate, but it does occur to me to be a wonderful exercise to prep the people for a later forced implantation of a microchip, like in your right hand or forehead.
Could be there is a hidden agenda here with the idea of accomplishing several goals, forced control of the people, vaccination for possible depopulation and a trial-balloon on later implantation? Just a thought.
On any large scale event of this kind — whether engineered or just response — there are typically many goals and many constituents creating ways that things can be designed to serve or benefit them. So yes, expect multiple goals, including those that develop organically over time. It is like a train that lots of people jump on…
Ms. Fitts,
This was a great angle on a very controversial issue. It’s one thing to say “the elite want to kill us all.” It’s another to show factually “the system as currently operated can only accomodate 500 million people.”
There are two questions that must be answered:
1) Are the “limits to growth” – population, food, water, social security, employment, etc. – the natural limits of energy, biology, imagination, etc.? Or are they an artifact of the system of control?
2) If the former, what is the most ethical means of population reduction? If the latter, what is the appropriate system for running the planet?
I think it’s important to, as you’ve done here, acknowledge that our current system can not be maintained. The people who write our laws and sign the paychecks for our courts, police and military have set up a system where, to take an example, a farmer can only survive by accepting public welfare and unpayable debt (or by growing specialty food for the dwindling rich). Why? Because by using law and order to depress and/or destabilize the price of anything of real value, the elite create opportunities for debt and speculation. Like fattening a spring lamb, they needed the precondition of a prosperous society built on earned income. The system was not built on a fantasy, but it’s been destroyed by one, and now that these financial predators have sucked the world dry, there’s nowhere to turn for their next meal. Their only option is to limit their liabilities via a surprise depopulation, and start over with a more manageable host.
I would submit that we are nowhere near the “carrying capacity” of the earth. We do things stupidly. People say, for example, that meat is inefficient. This is not true, as a traditional small farmer will know. A pig can put on 300 pounds of meat eating otherwise-useless scraps. A cow can produce a gallon of milk a day eating grass. A catfish can subsist on chicken crap and bugs. Why don’t we do this? Because Cargill owns the seeds, storage, shipping and processing, corners the futures markets, and buys the scientist, the regulator, and the politician, who appoints the dirty judge, who signs the warrant that sends the SWAT team to confiscate the real milk of the real farmer. You can find any number of examples in any sector of society.
Now – the last question: is this a result of “big government,” as some would say, or as I would argue, a hostile takeover of government made possible by an uninvolved population? What do we need to create a system governed by natural law and creativity? Do we need a Ron Paul or an Abraham Lincoln? Do we need a decentralized “free market” or the real constitutional principle of a strong central government that protects the general welfare against private interests? I think anyone who studies history honestly will dump the libertarian dogma and realize that the traditional American system of Hamilton, Lincoln & FDR is their only hope to change course.
Sorry this is a bit of a ramble. I feel very strongly that some very healthy and necessary awareness of the true nature of our “elites” is now building, and agree with your points above. But, I strongly disagree with the prevailing political solution of those in the alternative media. This is not our government. Our government has been shot, gutted, skinned, and is being worn by the pitchmen for transnational gamblers and dope dealers. Are we going to run for the hills, or are we going to destroy this insane reality with real information, real government, and a real commitment to the principles upon which this country was founded?
This is a very interesting view point of why the manufacture of the pandemics. I had attributed it merely to greed and control on behalf of the drug companies, but your financial background and argument makes it very plausible.
As Green Day said in their hit song “American Idiot” (which was written about George W Bush), the media is creating a “Subliminal Mindf***”. That people would line up for this vaccine, not questioning their doctors at all, is amazing to me. They have had their minds messed with in a most incidious way. But all over the news, no one questions the lack of testing, no one brings up the Swine Flu debacle of 1976 (which I vaguely remember) and no one wonders why it is considered safe to vaccinate a pregnant woman with a substance which contains ethyl mercury, one of the most toxic forms of mercury on earth. (They wouldn’t recommend something that would harm me, would they????) Unfortunately, docs have had their minds messed with as well.
Please frequently check out http://www.pandemicfluonline.com for updates on legal rights to avoid vaccines. Contributors are some of the leading health freedom activists in the US. I was just alerted to this fairly new website today by one of its contributing attorneys.