[Rather than post stories on the latest events in Ferguson, I thought I would republish this post that we originally published on March 19, 2009]
By Catherine Austin Fitts
I just got back from town where I listened to the latest rumors – the local African-American gang is rumored to be planning a gang initiation. Initiates are required, or so it goes, to kill three women and three men at the local big box store.
Two years ago, two kids went on a “wilding,” breaking into a series of homes and businesses in my town. This was followed by presentations from local law enforcement about wildings and various violent gang initiations.
Now, having grown up in an urban community taken over by drug dealing and having spent a fair amount of time learning how secret societies, law firms, banks and government agencies manage the narcotics business and $500 billion – $1 trillion of US money laundering, when you say “local gang” what I hear is “local CIA distributor.” So when a local drug gang does something or is rumored to do something, what I hear is that covert ops is on the move and the orders are coming top down.
Think back to the race riots. My sources have convinced me that they were started by covert ops shutting off the drug supply and seeding violent behavior. Or the school shootings. My bet is that people unwillingly put through mind control are being manipulated to help do shootings that make it easier to pass gun control laws. Sound far fetched? Spend some time studying how covert operations have been used and implemented historically and I think you will be surprised. If you have not read my online book yet, I would recommend reading it and the resource documentation provided as a good place to begin. Then watch the movies that illuminate mind control operations, including the new Manchurian Candidate, Bourne Identity, Telefon, Conspiracy Theory, Long Kiss Goodnight and La Femme Nikita.
When I heard the rumor today, I was not surprised. I have been expecting these kinds of rumors and ops. With bailouts up to $12-14 trillion, the Fed announcing another $1 trillion plus monetization and AIG bailing out Wall Street and paying out large bonuses, men and women on Main Street are frustrated. This is tax preparation time. When you are scrimping to come up with money to pay your taxes, the reminders that it will be liberally spent to make the rich richer runs the risk of setting off a class war or increased tax resistance.
How do you prevent a class war? How do you stop people from starting or joining tax resistance movements? Well, believe it or not, you start a race war. You target people who understand their rights and are working to build self sufficiency. If people are afraid, they will want more law and order. So they will pay their taxes. They will worry about the gangs next door instead of the gangs in the City of London. They will not realize the two are intimately connected.
Hate. Divide and conquer. It’s a business. The media is pushing it. The people directing it are the same people who brought you the AIG bonuses. Indeed, AIG is my vote for one of the top three financial institutions involved in financing domestic covert operations.
We have nothing to fear from teenagers of any color. They are our future. We have nothing to fear from patriots. They are our conscience. If we have anything to fear, it is the IRS.
Make sure you file your taxes on April 15th. The government needs our money. They need to give it to rich traders in London and secretive banks who are laundering the profits from the drugs and gangs that plague our neighborhoods.
God forbid everyone who owed the IRS money this year should file tax extensions in protest. God forbid Wall Street should have to wait until October 15 for more bailout money.
Guy,
Please tell me what racism is. I believe it is just a term to divide people, to muddy the debate. Do people actually intelligently take about race?
Races are specialized groups of people that have built in defenses against mixing. A person can respect another person of another race, but at a “heart” level, they know they are different and so maintain a distance from the other.
What god or nature has separated, empire needs to unite. As long as there are no material shortages, nature’s war between the races can be contained. When resource shortages occur, races raise to higher levels of conflict.
Empire is all about mixing and assimilating to create a greater and larger whole with greater power and strength in the world. At present the whole is not homogenous so when the strength of the empire is exhausted it will fall apart into its fundamental parts.
The elite can manipulate the races because conflict between races basically exists. Its real and needs to be respected.
It seems to me that if you are going to create a group to survive within, it should be an homogenous group that respects this reality. In the future we won’t be able to afford the luxury of multi-cultural society and an egalitarian world view.
ALawyer
Here is a link from liveleak.com that is from russiatoday.com. I apologize I have no formal training in computers and do not know how to create a link or I would give you more links. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0…=0f8_1235673139 I copied this link from a discussion forum at ICH. There are also 2 articles at rense.com by Dr. A. True Ott on this subject. As you say it may be a rumor and you may dismiss rense as a conspiracy website, but ironically rense is where I got the link to solari.com. Furthermore I am not ‘irresponsibly spreading rumors’ I’m trying to find more information on this and thought I’d ask since people here seem well-informed. I appreciate your response and hopefully more light can be shed on this. As you say government can take property but provide ‘fair compensation’ and eminent domain is notorious for bargain basement compensation. And need I add how many times ‘rumors’ have turned out to be true.
George Wells:
“The civil war was really about a conquest of a debt-free agrarian system by a militaristic industrial capitalist slave system.
The principles of the foundation fathers are based upon a history and a culture, a northern european people who embodied their spirit into documents to preserve the same. Some of other races have assimilated and accepted these principles and can understand them, to assimilate the elite of other cultures and people can strengthen a nation. Assimiliating the dross destroys a nation. Most so called immigrants really have a different reality and can not really understand or sustain those principles.
Freedom is not a part of their mental or historical make-up.”
“Please tell me what racism is. I believe it is just a term to divide people, to muddy the debate. Do people actually intelligently take about race?
Races are specialized groups of people that have built in defenses against mixing. A person can respect another person of another race, but at a “heart” level, they know they are different and so maintain a distance from the other.
What god or nature has separated, empire needs to unite. As long as there are no material shortages, nature’s war between the races can be contained. When resource shortages occur, races raise to higher levels of conflict.
Empire is all about mixing and assimilating to create a greater and larger whole with greater power and strength in the world. At present the whole is not homogenous so when the strength of the empire is exhausted it will fall apart into its fundamental parts.
The elite can manipulate the races because conflict between races basically exists. Its real and needs to be respected.
It seems to me that if you are going to create a group to survive within, it should be an homogenous group that respects this reality. In the future we won’t be able to afford the luxury of multi-cultural society and an egalitarian world view.”
* Whose definition of “race” are you using – what was the purpose of said classification and who did it benefit and why? Do you think definitions of “race” are in and of themselves objective? If they are not – then you have to deal with what was the socio-political-economic agenda behind such constructs. If you take the term “white christian” you are using a term that was defined, relatively recently in human history by certain elites to justify their agenda. If you go back before a certain point, white people were not “white” and neither were they christian, and if you go further these people were not even European as the concept of Europe as a unifying symbol did not exist before that. Christianity was an EMPIRE force that UNITED Europe under a common IDENTITY – that was its purpose as a tool of the ROMAN EMPIRE. Remember, all of the older socio-political-economic systems were wiped away in Europe to pave the way for this new order – older things were repressed or assimilated by the new political order. In this sign you shall CONQUER – remember that. That is where the European Christian identity came from – from the coalescing force of EMPIRE. Whiteness is also a construct that was used to classify human beings in a stratified way to justify further expansion and BUILD UPON the already entrenched notions of EMPIRE introduced by the Roman Empire. When did Europeans start to call themselves “WHITE” in contradistinction to other people – this is not a natural construct, but rather the result of the process of EMPIRE and EXPANSIONISM. The founding fathers and the enlightenment that they came out of was not the RESULT of their natural northern european racial spirit – it was the result of the process whereby knowledge was re-introduced to a Europe which was devoid of it and repressed by the Roman church control over many aspects of intellectual and political life. The older Greek ideas(which in fact had their origin outside of Greece if you really wnat to go far back), sciences, and political theory were preserved by cultures outside of Europe and were gradually re-integrated into Europe when the socio-political-economic climate changed and the church lost its complete totalitarian grip on the European mind. The founding fathers were the result of this process- it didn’t come from some mythical northern european spirit – it came from the socio-political climate that they were a part of. Your view of “freedom” not being part of certain peoples “mental or historical make-up” sounds like one of the most elitist thing I have ever heard. If you studied just a little bit into other cultures such as in Western indigenous Africa or certain American Indians you would see examples of democracy that are of a far greater anciency and antiquity than any that came from the political clime of the founding fathers or the enlightenment which they were a part of.
Now, your point about Empire necessitating the need to bring different groups of people together for expedient purposes is something which I believe has some merit. Remember though – the peoples which Empire attempts to assimilate are in fact most of the time conquered and these peoples old indigenous traditions, religion, social order, family structures, and culture are destroyed and/or devalued. If you want to stick to Europe – you can see this process happening when the Roman Empire started to take over and destroy the older cultural systems that exited their prior to its expansionism. In its place is some new version of culture(NEW WORLD ORDER) which fills the vacuum – whether it came in the form of CHRISTIANITY with its whole socio/religious world-view and attachment to an empire state system, ECONOMIC control and usurption of resources and today a decadent consumerist culture.
Now do you want to go deep? Maybe we need to start talking about MONO-theism and how that relates to the concept of ONE OUT OF MANY and ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. A concept of a godhead with all the power and control in a singular form is a PROJECTION of the people from whence such a concept came forth. Now where did THIS come from?
Here is a quote for you:
“A world state was the way of enforcing stability and was obviously welcomed by most people, but especially trading peoples and those making specialized products for trade. Besides the use of military and administrative means of control, such empires depended on the propagation of a universal religion. The Assyrian universal state that the Persians took over, with the brief interlude of Babylon, had a god called Ashur (Asshur, Assur) who was depicted as a man rising from a winged solar disc and shooting a bow or offering a ring, often thought to be a diadem or coronet but probably symbolising a bond (like a wedding ring) or covenant such as we find often in the Hebrew scriptures. The Persian god, Ahuramazda, was depicted in a similar way as a man rising head and shoulders above a solar disc also offering a ring, or sometimes apparently a blessing.
Ahura is the Persian rendering of Vedic asura which is uncommonly like Ashur, though the Assyrian language was Semitic. J H Moulton, who knew something about these things, agreed with Dr Martin Gemoll who proposed in 1911 that Ahuramazda was the same god as Ashur.
John A Tvedtnes, in an article in J Near Eastern Studies 40 (1981) rejected the long-accepted statement of Herodotus (Histories 7.63) that “Syrian” was the Greek way of saying “Assyrian”. Tvedtnes proposed that Syria is derived from Hurri, an old Egyptian word for the Hurrians, which in Coptic would have changed to Suri. Richard N Frye says the vocalization of the word Syria and the supposed Middle Egyptian word “Suri” do not favour the hypothesis.
Both Tvedtnes and Frye can be right in a sense if Syrian equates with Assyrian as Herodotus says but both of them are at source the same as Hurrian. The Greeks first used the term Syrian at the beginning of the seventh century BC for the people of Cilicia and Cappadocia. Herodotus says that Syrians are called Cappadocians by the Persians. Cappadocia is in Anatolia not Assyria or Syria. It is the centre of the area settled by the tribes called Hurrians who were the same race as the Mitanni whose brief empire was centred in Syria, near Harran.
There seems probable philological connexions between Assyria, Syria, Surya (Indic sun), Assur, Asura, Ahura, Hurri and biblical Horites and Hivites. All might be connected with the sun or brightness, and Lordship, and perhaps hills and highlands, sun worship being often conducted in high places.
The solar nature of the disc is clear in the picture of Ashur offering the ring but, in the picture of him with a bow and in the picture of Ahuramazda, the ring is plainly a symbolic girdle, presumably the equivalent of the Zoroastrian Kusti girdle. Did Assyrians have the same custom of wearing a girdle as the Persians? A tasselled cord is plain on their depictions of people. Ahuramazda is said to wear the heavens as his Kusti girdle and in the depictions of him it will be the circle of the ecliptic, the circle of the zodiac. Since the Indians also wear a sacred cord, it seems that the Assyrians had adopted Aryan customs, presumably from an earlier Aryan invasion—perhaps the Hurrians or Mitanni.
Already in the first century of the second millennium BC, the kings of Assyria were being called Ashur and were adopting the bow and arrows as a sign of office and the handed-over-ring as a sign of favour by gods and goddesses. A god called “Assara Mazas” has been noted in Assyrian lists of gods. Mazda appears in the names of Medes from about 700 BC.
Ashurbanipal took the hands of Sin and Ninku at Harran, according to a royal inscription. It echoes the practice of the monarch taking the hand of Bel Marduk at the Babylonian new years ceremonies and copied by Cyrus. These observations hint at syncretic tendencies in these religions, and it is interesting to speculate whether Bel-Marduk, the god of Babylon, had also begun to take on universal characteristics at this time.
Cyrus accused the king of Babylon of neglecting Marduk, the great universal god. Of course, Cyrus was intent on giving universal qualities to all of the principle gods of his conquests, and this was perhaps merely the start of it for Marduk, but the earlier Babylonian kings might have seen Marduk in a similar light. Berosus says Medes ruled Babylon for up to 200 years giving some credence to the idea, but Berosus was not reliable in his lists of kings.
The Assyrians, in the west, at any rate, seemed to regard Sin as a universal god. S W Holloway claims the “locally manufactured glyptics symbolizing the cult of Sin at Harran proliferated in the western arm of the Fertile Crescent” showing that the Assyrians must have been promoting the spread of the cult.
It is historically probable that the spread of the moon god cult of Harran by Assyria was a self-conscious act of imperial statecraft, designed to foster the acceptance of a cult whose pantheon was understood as protecting and legitimizing Assyrian interests in the West…
The equivalent of the cross, Constantine’s “in hoc signo vinces” for the Assyrian kings in the West was the lunar crescent of the moon god.
This lunar crescent symbol had been found by 1993 at fourteen stratified sites in Palestine and Transjordan—at Hazor, Tell Kosan, Tell es Samak, Megiddo and Tell Doshan, Samaria, Gezer, Tell en Nasbeh, Tell Jemmah, Horbat Uzza, Nebo and Taliwan. An unstratified example of a seal stamp was found at Gezer, showing a lunar crescent and a pendant star, datable by eponym to 649 BC and declared as belonging to Netanyahu, a name indicating the god Yehouah.
Religion was used for political purposes by ancient kings in the near east. Indeed, that probably is its purpose!
In reorganizing the cult, the king sought to bring the total life of the nation under the domain of the national deity. The king built a temple for the nation’s god and constructed a palace for himself as the god’s earthly regent. He established sanctuaries as cultic and administrative centers and created other structures for storage and security. He appointed private and other civil servants to implement royal policy, and deployed military personnel. He fixed the religious calendar and fulfilled the cultic duties of the head of state. Thus “religion was an arm of royal administration”.
Carl D Evans here summarises, in a few sentences, Gosta Ahlström’s Royal Administration and National Administration in Ancient Palestine, ending with a quotation from it that epitomizes the work and what should have been obvious to all historians. Yet, Steven W Holloway who has carefully studied the Assyrian cults in a biblical connexion declares that the Assyrian foreign service were not interested in the cultic practices of their vassals and their provinces, unless they might have political consequences.
Since it would be hard to know whether there was a political implication in cultic practices without first taking an interest in them, we can assume that they were interested in them all, initially, and only lost interest in those that offered no likely challenges. The Urartians or Chaldians in the hills to the north of the Assyrian steppes had shown they were a danger to the Assyrians who accordingly had a keen interest in stopping the Chaldians from using their temple to their god Chaldi at Musasir. A puppet king Urzana was appointed to Musasir with instructions not to let the officials and the king of Urartu use the temple.
Richard Frye of Harvard (The Heritage of Persia:) thought the Persian kings had a concept of “One World” and the “fusion of all people and cultures” in one “Oecumen” was their important legacy, inherited by Alexander, the Romans and the Arabs. In ancient times “culture” essentially was religion.”
source: http://www.cais-soas.com/CAIS/Religions/non-iranian/judaism/persian_judaism/book2/pt6.htm
Fantastic article!
Search “Carbon Disclosure Project” and “Weaponized Weather Modification” and connect the dots….
Also, “The Green Agenda” website is well worth a look.
Wonder if this is the latest false flag for martial law??? They have tried everything under the sun to get that VERY MUCH NEEDED martial law to complete their agenda and its been elusive, they keep getting caught. Wonder if Obama’s paying Blackwater $70 million dollars last week is in anyway related???? He would not say what he paid them that for…. so who knows…
Remember also about a year ago, in a German paper, a sargeant was caught telling his training troops to pretend they are in the ghetto in America in Harlem and to fight like they were in danger… so maybe martial law will be done by globalized troops and that is why all of ours are overseas…. ya think???
Do your self a favor. Get a life! And give-up the dope…your brains have turned to JELLO!
Guy’s post in essence: the Roman idea of turning the world into one city in order to facilitate the control of the many by the few originated with Assyrian emperors, esp. in laying the groundwork for universalist monotheism. Yet it should be no surprise that Assur was Vedic: so is Allah, whose 99 excellent names are all names of Shiva, whose servant god Chandra is the Hindu moon god, which is why Shiva wears a crescent moon. Islam is likewise syncretic in being an interpretation of Judaism that has Shiva rather than Yahweh as its god. This should be no surprise to anyone initiated in the Templar orders where one learns why ‘everything is Shiva’.