Post your comments and questions for July, 2014.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

19 Comments

    1. http://www.opticsplanet.com/nightvision.html

      This website represents a reliable vendor of optics whether it be for binoculars for birdwatching or tactical optics for weapons. Gen2 is probably NOT the latest optical format but the best for getting clear results. I have to believe our military and certainly “they” have a much more advanced system. My understanding is that Gen1, which is the least expensive, is going to give you somewhat fuzzy night vision and is fairly “old” technology. I “inherited” my optics but learned a few things about optics from my husband before he died; he often used opticsplanet as a source.

  3. I am probably too late and this interview is past tense, however:
    Ask Catherine comment/question related to Mark McCandlish July 10 Solari Report:

    Mark suggested during the SSP that his expertise was as a hand-draw artist/painter as opposed to the current graphic expression of computer-aided drawing (CAD) and somehow acted as if he accepted this “replacement”. One only has to look at the drawing that he made from the assimilation of his friend’s observation/description and his own engineering knowledge of how it “must work” to understand that this can only start with a hand-drawn right brain/ left brain experience. The entire format for CAD does not promote artistic or creative expression unless it begins with a model or an existing sketch. I totally reject that the brilliance of Mark McCandlish can be accomplished by some geek in front of a computer.

    I understand that Mark is no longer being asked to draw futuristic aviation concepts but is he using his remarkable skills to move forward, whether it be to simply satisfy is own art expression, to engineer something/s for himself, or has the whole cyclone of events surrounding his presentation of these facts caused him to walk away from his art and is simply moving on to help others try to grasp the enormity of the secret space program as his focus?

  4. Catherine, from the SSP conference presentations: would you please expand on how to ‘reverse the drain in your life’ with specifics, for the nice list of different areas R. Dolan outlined:

    universal surveillance
    single finance system
    international law trumps state and national law
    transhumanism to create class system
    whatever else on his list that I have forgotten

    I don’t watch TV, and appreciate guidance on how to stop feeding the breakaway superstructure.

    Also, what are the best night vision goggles or glasses to look for UFOs? (I’ve missed a few presentations, I apologize if you’ve already presented this info.)

    Thank you.

    1. Generation 2 are the best night vision optics that you can buy. You don’t have to purchase the goggles, per se, as any Gen2 optics will work, including ones intended to be mounted on weapons. This information was new to me and I found observing the night sky through a monocular eyepiece was spectacularly successful. I use mine for trying to see howling coyotes so I could not have been more shocked than if it was through a socket.

      Btw, I doubt there were many television watchers attending that conference. Most, if not all, were internet informed, not alphabet TV learned.

      Interesting question as you attempt to lace two presentations into a thought. I look forward to Catherine’s response.

  5. Thank you, Catherine, so much for being a fundamental part of The Secret Space Program. Your conversation with Bonnie Faulkner makes me smile when you explained your being a bit fuzzy about the UFO discussions since there were no hard facts to back up their origin because, until I met you, chemtrails and HAARP were equally fuzzy to me. (I guess Gov. Perry doesn’t approve of chemtrails over his head since I still haven’t seen hard first-hand evidence but have heard enough expert testimony now to be a believer.) I had seen a UFO when I was in elementary school but could never understand where they could possibly have originated. They were part of some mysterious Air Force Project, as far as I knew, because I grew up near Wright Patterson AFB and anything from there was possible. Absolutely anything.

    I have followed some of the UFO websites, including the Camelot interviews, et al, and read several books from “experts” but, as you point out, the actual science was almost always lacking. The panel of experts at the Secret Space Program, however, presented a whole different situation. There was not a single “whack job”, not a single person whose work was not significantly researched, explained in great detail, or an unimportant thread to the fabric of the message. Furthermore, the fact that this was a serious conference on a very complex issue, the audience had a very interesting reaction: what got you to San Mateo and the Secret Space Program?

    As it turns out, Henrik Palmgren has a huge following on Red Ice Radio. Many of the audience started with Henrik. I started with Zero Hedge, a commenter turned me on to you and Solari, and you in turn introduced me to Dr. Farrell, (I have become a regular fan of GizaDeathStar.com), Richard Dolan, and Jon Rappaport. While I was unfamiliar with Michael Schratt, I had heard interviews with Mark McCandlish and was familiar with his expertise and his demise as a result of his honest (and creative) work. I am still not familiar with Robert Morningstar, though I believe he should have been able to contribute more based upon the fact that the rest of you wanted him there, and have a weird, uncomfortable feeling about the big hair of Carol Rosin. (Like I said, I am tuned into serious research supported by facts presented in a thoughtful way). At the end, all of the people who had a formed the group in which I had been included, thought that the conference was well worth the time and effort it took to get there. Most were thrilled to be able to talk about this subject as they were surrounded by skeptics or married to people who thought they were insane.

    Most of all, I don’t believe I met a single person who did not know about you, Catherine, and about the way you are able to pull together facts and numbers, analyze on the spot, and show what true “critical thinking” is all about. Many came because if you were going to be there, then it was obviously going to be a serious discussion. The fact is that you have always been able to sort out facts from emotions, as with your “slow burn” model as opposed to the mass hysteria of imminent financial disaster (not that I don’t want to be prepared, just in case you are wrong – heh). The combination of your presentation and Dr. Farrell’s history of who (the scary powerful who) and how we got here made a strong case for the scale of fraud and power the breakaway civilization represents while Dolan, supported by Schratt and McCandlish, illustrate that we are close to that moment of disclosure. Something is going to give and it is going to be in our lifetime. Presumably. When it does, it is going to be BIG.

    Knowing that, I am going to buy Farrell another dinner and look forward to the next time this energy comes together.

    Jane Owens

  6. Where does GM food / biotech in general play into black budget? into secret space program?

    Thanks

    K

  7. Part 2 of Catherine’s conference slideshow is a damaged file. Something a bit too revelatory in it, perhaps? Anyway, the link doesn’t work.

    1. Odd, it worked when I tested it yesterday.

      I re-uploaded so all should be good now!

Comments are closed.