19 Comments

1. http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2014/07/12/nestle-arrowhead-tapping-water/12589267/
   Nestle and the bottled water business in desert springs

   It is clear that water is our most precious resource and that too much of it is wasted. My next door neighbor with big bucks from his land fill construction business (!) continues to drill wells and use existing ones to fill stock ponds for his growing exotic herd with which he intends to provide hunts for his wealthy clients. Meanwhile, we keep calculating and recalculating what water we need in order to irrigate our hay fields that will feed not only our livestock but cattle on at least two more ranches. We struggle with the idea that we will be utilizing water for our hay knowing that our residential neighbors will be getting less and less for their use over time. At what point does the water board decide to rescind our permits for agricultural production because our jerk neighbor has drawn down the aquifer for his pleasure?

   When you start looking at the article linked above, the question then becomes at what point do we take the economy from the Morongo Indian Reservation provided by Nestle in their harvest for bottled water? It is obvious that the time is nearing when decisions must be made as to how water resources are to be used, but who will make these decisions? The same group of bureaucrats who support big pharma and the MIC or the citizens whose aquifer is affected? And what compensation will be allotted to those who lose their rights? I think the Indians have a case for loss of income but what about my fat cat neighbor whose vanity ponds will dry up, or our ranch when we have to go back to working simply with God for our feed?

   We have some very tough decisions ahead, no doubt about it. If we leave it to the Agenda 21 bureaucrats, we will all be schlepped into the cities, told when to turn on/off our electric, our water, our lives, and the breakaways will have what open land is left that they haven’t sold off to foreign interests all for themselves.

   And this comes from someone living in Texas!

   Jane

2. Jane:

   I don’t know what the truth is and on these topics the area is so ripe with disinformation, I don’t even try.

   One of the people who has looked into the filming topic the most posits that the moon landings happened but the media presented ones that were taped as the real deal was kept under wraps for National Security reasons. If I was running DOD and NASA in a world were non disclosure was the official policy, sounds like something I might do so it had the ring of truth to me.

   Catherine

3. Given the incredibly informative Secret Space Program conference, I thought you might also be interested in this. As usual, one of the comments on Dr. Farrell’s website, http://www.gizadeathstar.com, led me to this rather incredible series of articles about NASA and the Apollo Mission.

   http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/index.html
   read “Wagging the Moondoggie”

   In this series, the blogger makes a very compelling argument that ALL of the moon walking exploration that NASA broadcast over the (still rather primitive) TV in the 1960’s was a total hoax. Such a big hoax, in fact, that even the Russians who were vastly superior in space exploration at that time have STILL not put a man on the moon. Nor have the Chinese. Furthermore, the 700 cartons of TAPED film footage shot of the Apollo 1 mission, and the 13,000+ reels of computer data were all “lost” in the 1970’s. Knowing that every email, every phone conversation, every… (fill in the blank) is being monitored and stored somewhere by the NSA, we are led to believe that ALL the records for the most pivotal moment in our 20th century was “LOST”?

   What this means is that we are not only kept in the dark about the actual technology available to the breakaway civilization in terms of free energy and warp speed spacecraft, but we are filled to the absolute brim with propaganda about what primitive technologies we are supposed to have. I leave you with this quote from the article attributed to Werner Von Braun so you can sit back in your chair and try to absorb this all. (Frankly, I am hoping my own head doesn’t explode.)

   “It is commonly believed that man will fly directly from the earth to the moon, but to do this, we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility. It would have to develop sufficient speed to penetrate the atmosphere and overcome the earth’s gravity and, having traveled all the way to the moon, it must still have enough fuel to land safely and make the return trip to earth. Furthermore, in order to give the expedition a margin of safety, we would not use one ship alone, but a minimum of three … each rocket ship would be taller than New York’s Empire State Building [almost ¼ mile high] and weigh about ten times the tonnage of the Queen Mary, or some 800,000 tons.”

   Wernher von Braun, the father of the Apollo space program, writing in Conquest of the Moon

4. Richard:

   The stream is working so you can access when you wish.

   I have not seen that documentary.

   I do know of the Russian president’s comments. However, I continue to say “I don’t know.” The layers of disinformation around this subject boggles the mind.

   I do think we need to peel the onion on this one as solutions require understanding the real governance system operating around us.

   Catherine

5. Unfortunately I have not been able to to get access to the conference yet and so some of this may have been covered. I was just looking at comments Soviet PM Medvediev made post a formal TV interview with the Russian TV interviewers where he said that aliens existed and are here in numbers he would not want to alarm us by saying. He said he had been briefed formally after he became president and that if she (the post interview questioner) wanted to know more to watch the Russian documentary (as opposed to Hollywood tale) “Men in Black” which as of writing this could be found at this location: http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2012/12/russia-disclosure-aliens-are-living.html
   Translation is rudimentary and the picture is not perfect but it left me with the impression it was an honest attempt to share what the Russians know but more importantly that we (people of Earth) might be paying some kind of tribute to these aliens in return for technology tightly kept in the hands of the western elites – they mentioned England France and the US in particular. Are you familiar with this stuff? Could that be where all the gold is going? Or the reason behind much of the environmental destruction. The blocking technology theyhave seems to render conventional weapons systems impotent according to the documentary.

6. Holy Cow, Catherine! Your interview with Mark McCandlish had me sitting with my mouth open in total amazement. More than half of the concepts that Mark casually explained were clearly above my head (physics is the one and only science I skipped in undergraduate school) but his clear and concise explanations made it possible to get the overall picture, enough so that I am beginning to understand the idea that Einstein either had it all wrong… or purposely led us in the wrong direction. After attending the SSP conference, I can’t be sure of the answer to that.

   After listening to Mark in previous interviews and then at the SSP, I was concerned that I would not learn a lot more from him. I was delightfully wrong! I hope you enjoyed doing the interview as much as I enjoyed listening!

   WOW. Just wow.

7. Thanks for posting your interview with Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot here on Solari.com. Quite frankly, it was one of her best interviews in that she did not direct the dialogue toward her interests but let you speak openly and she then responded with appropriate sidebars. Since you had your Sunday SSP presentation fresh in your mind, it was also one of your best presentations of not only how you got to understand the whole global coup d’tat but also your vision for Solari.com and for your financial clients. In fact, I have forwarded this interview on to several of my advisors and friends to guide them in your direction. I hope everyone, especially your subscribers and clients, takes the time to listen to the full interview. I think they will pat themselves on the back for being so smart to be “listening” to you.

   JMHO

   Jane

Comments are closed.