Post your comments and questions for December, 2016.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

90 Comments

    1. Part of this is all the big guys going to Washington and trying to get Congress and the regulators to kill all of their competition. The more flow they get running through the publicly traded stocks, the more capital gains on their stock – that is the biggest source of campaign contributions. Problem is when you shut down all the entrepreneurs and small business it collapses the jobs and ultimately, with no middle class, there are no customers for a lot of the corporations. They stay to solve that problem by having government buy or mandate purchases, but ultimately we see on Obamacare how that has worked.

      When you destroy the economy with central control, you kill productivity and shrink the economy. Central control did not work in the Soviet Union and it will not work here either.

      1. Amen! One would think that with the huge failure that the USSR and a host of other communist countries was……and the millions of people that died for that social/economic experiment, people would learn that central control doesn’t work.

  3. FYI, Catherine. I believe that policies like these are at least part of the reason why we have so much illegal immigration, especially from our neighbors from the south. It’s interesting to me that few people ask why persons from those countries would leave everything they know to go to a country that they don’t know much about and along the way, subject themselves to many dangers. I’m sure there are a host of answers, but one of them probably has to do with the flooding of agricultural products into those countries that decimates the native farmers that are there and forces them to look elsewhere for work.

    Chad

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/entrenching-capitalist-agriculture-in-india-under-the-guise-of-development/5561446

    1. If you have not watched the video on the Solari site entitled Sir James Goldsmith 1994 Globalization Warning, you need to do so IMMEDIATELY.

    1. My guess is the fraud was significant on both sides. However, I think the election was decided before the election – after the Wiener laptop feel into NYPD and NY FBI hands.

      Look at the markets. The market started to trade the Republican win BEFORE the election.

  7. Speaking of pedophile rings, as much ground as you and Joe Farrell covered in the whirlwind election discussion, i was a bit surprised the vast pedophilia monstrosity wasn’t mentioned. Do we think this issue is overblown, or maybe an intended made-up diversion from their bigger secrets (i.e., the missing $$ trillions, HUD, etc.)?
    Joe highlighted democrats’ viciousness in likely blackballing Dr. Carson in the context of their need to keep the ghettos in despair and their inner city gold mine intact, which i found appalling to say the least.
    But embedded pedophilia problem appears more obvious, widespread, and horrific. Also the required viciousness – a la Joe’s HUD/Carson comments – to maintain the network intact and operable seems to also fit.
    So, I’m just curious whether you think the pedophile disaster merits discussion as a hidden causality for what makes the world go round, and whether it might be a dot which we should try to connect to the bigger picture.

    1. Actually, it is very important discussion. When I discussed the Wiener laptop helping win the election, that was part of what I expect was in the material on the laptop. I have asked Jon Rappoport to do a show with me in early Feb on Pedophila, so look for that right after we finish the Wrap Up series in January. The missing trillions is a bigger story, but the pedophilia is the one that causes the dangerous infighting – once likened by a Kemp staffer as “like going at each other with razor blades on a rubber lifeboat.” You might want to go back and listen to the Franklin Cover Up Solari Report I did with Nick Bryant. I will be doing one post that is relevant as well before the end of the year.

Comments are closed.