2017-12-subscriber-input

2017 Subscriber’s Input

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

224 Comments

  1. Ms. Fitts and Solari Members:
    I just read and listened to a disturbing development for Chicago. Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin, met with Sec.Gen of the UN, asking for ‘advice’ and potential deployment of ‘UN Peacekeeping Troops’ on US Soil in Chicago. This is just one recent article, but Boykin’s original statement before the meeting can be seen in this video clip (or search for UN Boykin) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pthy6TVkxgU “County Official: Let’s Invite U.N. ‘Peacekeepers’ To Chicago” http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chicagoinc/ct-met-boykin-un-1215-chicago-inc-20171214-story.html

    Any thoughts or ideas about this? Is this Constitutional/Legal? I don’t know much about the legalities, but just looking at the UN Peacekeeping Website, or searching for the Demographics of the ‘Peace Keepers’, it makes me a bit ‘uneasy’ to have foreign troops on US Soil…Where will this end IF we allow this to happen? I live in a Suburb outside the West Side of Chicago, and am concerned about the 650 plus deaths by gang members/violent offenders. This ‘trend’ is beginning to ‘migrate’ to the Suburban Areas on a more regular basis. Thank You for all you do, and hope this can be avoided. Take Care, Colleen

    1. I would impeach/recall Boykin, meet with the Sheriff of Cook County to demand a 1 year clean up and organize the open source resources so that citizens could all help the Sheriff do so. If that did not achieve the results I would start a citizens petition to invite the national guard in to clean up the violence. As I was doing this I would map out all the financial ecosystems in the area – including crowdfunding the support to get Bill Bergman at Truth in Accounting to help you do so. I would also demand that Oprah explain why she has allowed genocide of black communities all these years while she became a billionare. She either weights in to fix the real problems or she gets outed and someone who just keeps everyone happy and shopping while first the black communities and the white communities are genocided.

      Teenagers do not control the drug business in Chicago.

    1. There is a serious need to clean out DOJ. I hope the Uranium One scandal is made fully transparent and prosecuted. It is the story of America. I am sick of watching illegal kill lists created so the swamp can play for pay.

  5. We are now witness to The New York Times speaking directly of UFOs and the Deep State in the same (seemingly measured) breath. A key figure is the plastic model person of Harry Reid. He was short on credibility in his straight role of senator. The supposed “black budget” money mentioned is a paltry $22 million. The sum of this is suspicious, and has the optics of an op. Comments, please.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html

    1. Given what just broke in the Bundy case and the implications to the Uranium One scandal, I find it odd that Reid is being brought up in that context.

  6. Deep State House Organ The New York Times somehow gets the scoop. Curious how the administration wasn’t asked for comment. Theater of the absurd.

      1. I can’t claim to know anything special about it, but clearly from Day 1, the whole incident could not have simply involved cattle eating grass and the natural result of it. That both sides went to armed confrontation suggests something quite a bit more fundamental–and I don’t think it’s too much to suggest that there is a close correlation between the willingness of the ranchers to stand up at all costs to the government and the unexpected repudiation of business as usual in the 2016 elections. The government probably knows this and is engineering a mistrial exit strategy. The Deep State doesn’t want a broken arrow incident or the resulting headaches of disclosing what this *really* was about. One imagines that what connects the NYT UFO disclosure kerfuffle and the Bundy matter is that each in its own way represents the Deep State recognizing that it’s not just California that’s on fire.

        1. I am still trying to figure out if Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder will delivering the Uranium One deal or Warren Buffet’s solar farms. Or both.

        2. Bundy = Uranium One Scandal. And not a word that I can tell from Fox News about Uranium One since this happened and Disney dished out a commitment to buy it and other Fox entertainment assets for $66 Billion. The silence on this is deafening. Not just in the corporate media but in the independent media as well.

  7. I am a new subscriber and trying to get to understand the implications of a breakaway civilization. The biggest issue with this scenario and I hope you can shine a light on it would be: We have reached peak oil…so where do we get the energy to do all of this?

    1. Michael:

      Excellent question. Breakthrough energy technology has been available for 100+ years – that we know of. The commitment to gas and oil is a political commitment, not technological. I believe that the breakaways are not dependent on oil and gas – at all.

      Question is why the commitment to oil and gas. I suspect that one of the drivers is the danger if the technology becomes visible that too many people could then weaponize it.

      Catherine

      1. Speaking of oil, James Corbett’s ‘How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World’ is excellent.
        https://www.corbettreport.com/bigoil/

        Things like 27 mysterious fires, which started simultaneously in Thomas Edison’s fireproof research complex, while he just happened to be working on supplying Henry Ford with advanced batteries for an electric Model-T a century ago, are not well known…

        1. If you look at the firepower that has kept us on the oil and gas model it is way beyond the power that the oil companies can deliver alone. That means that the enforcement is driven by the oil standard tied to the currency or by a treaty obligation or both. Or some need to reduce oxygen in the atmosphere. The greed of the oil companies does not translate into the cross sector compliance. Watch the documentary on Who Killed the Electric Car. You see what happens when Mr. Global dictates something about the fundamental model.

          1. There is also that theory, the atmosphere is purposefully being degraded to be especially inhospitable to an alien occupation/colonization.

            The ‘Who Killed the Electric Car?’ documentary is good, as is ‘Internal Combustion’ by Edwin Black.
            Corbett’s two documentaries are less narrowly focused, but the power behind his curtain is firmly the Rockefeller Technocracy interests, no treatment of the Military-Intelligence Breakaway Civilization.

          2. David Rockfeller died in March 2017. So lots of power and money moving in on the Rockelleres and their syndicate lieutenants, the Bushes and the Clintons.

          3. Odd. When I first tried to post this last comment, our database server went down. We brought it back up right away.

            Spiritual warfare!

    2. Michael, re energy:
      1) UFOs, they didn’t get here using petrol, and the secret reverse engineering of them has been going on since the 1940s.
      2) Nikola Tesla was working on taking free energy right out of the atmosphere a century ago, however that work didn’t sit too well at the time with Westinghouse and Morgan.

      2. Michael…I was someone who was on the Peak Oil bandwagon, and to me it now seems like it was an operation of deceit foisted upon us by very powerful people. There doesn’t seem to be any shortage of oil now, oil prices are lower than they were years ago, and the economy is doing better than what would have been predicted by Peak Oil about 10 years ago. In addition, in follow-up to what John said, there appears to be alternative sources of energy available that are just not being publicly disclosed to us.

        1. Jim, you are correct. Peak Oil is a cynical misdirection of an unwitting public. Oil is made through geological processes and that’s why you have methane giants like Uranus and Neptune–places where no dinosaurs lived then decayed. CH4 is the second most plentiful substance in the universe and the heat and pressure inside planets polymerizes it into more complex compounds, the opposite of what we do when we refine crude oil. See Thomas Gold, Deep, Hot Biosphere.

          Click and Clack, the Tappet Brothers used to joke that we should waste oil, to bring about its replacement. In actuality, the conservation of it ensures that the paradigm doesn’t change. Sustainability is the term. Biofuels are another contributor to keeping the paradigm the same. My opinion is that any sort of near-free energy further loosens the grip that Mr. Global likes to keep on us. It’s nothing to do with whether he makes money on oil or his interest in a cleaner planet.

          1. Worth checking out Farrell’s presentation at SSP 2015. I think this may be part of the “treaty obligations.”

Comments are closed.