Post your comments and questions for February, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

118 Comments

  1. Catherine: I want to draw attention to a newly published book co-authored by Dr. Chelsea Clinton, ‘Governing Global Health: Who runs the world and why’.

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0190253274/ref=od_aui_detailpages00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

    Chelsea Clinton is currently the Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation and a Lecturer at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia. She completed her D.Phil in International Relations at Oxford University examining the first decade of the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria. The book is based on her dissertation. While the reviews are not stellar, the book is an attempt to empirically analyze the governance and financing processes that drive the Global Health ecosystem. They discuss the role of public private partnerships in Global Health (PPPs) where private non-governmental organizations, for-profit enterprises, and various other social entrepreneurs work hand-in-hand with governments to combat specific maladies.The belief is that by joining together, PPPs will attack health problems and fund shared efforts more effectively than other systems. Just ordering now.. I am hopeful this analysis sheds further light on the governance processes at work and best practices as well as lessons learned that are impacting the health and well-being of billions of people world wide.

  2. Hi Catherine,

    Around the New year there was a post under Wildcards on the blog to an interview between Kerry Cassidy of Project Camelot and William Tompkins. I noticed it was taken down a few days later. I did watch the interview and it really blew me away!’ I was wondering if you had any thoughts on it and why you decided to take it down?

    Thank you so much ?

  3. FYI, Catherine. Here’s an interesting speech fro m France on the marriage of faux feminism and the retrograde elements of Islam. We can see it here in the US also. I wonder if this is part of some plan to destroy what is left of liberalism, which is a shame. Or maybe this is part of a cycle where the movement is reaching its nadir, because the only ones that are left are the ones with the most anger towards the masculine. It’s ironic that they now ally themselves with people who are hypermasculine with a dark twist. I don’t understand what these “feminists” think a proper outcome would be if they succeed. How is Sharia Law good for their movement or themselves personally? It seems to be a deal with the devil.

    Chad

    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/02/no_author/demolishing-feminist-hypocrisy-3-minutes/

    1. Chad:

      I don’t know – I don’t know much of anything about current feminist groups. I have one
      friend who taught women’s studies and my contact is limited to trying to understand
      her point of view or trying to understand the point of view of the Clinton team during the election.

      Over the last two years I kept bumping into the effort to promote women – see my series called Promoting Women. I also kept running into the effort to promote homosexuality and transgender and use those issues to access private data on families through school children and intimidate or target Christians.

      If you cut through all of it I felt like it was “divide and conquer” to weaken and control. There is a lot of power, money and mind control organized to incentivize people to create a series of “human issues” to front for a model that essentially has an inhuman goal of slavery and harvesting.

      1. Catherine,
        I would encourage you to look into the issue in your abundant free time, lol. I feel like a woman with your background and gravitas would be a positive voice in bringing some sanity to the discussion. Untold numbers of women are buying into this meme and it is detrimental to them personally, let alone what it could do to a country. Indeed, some of these women have been raped and/or killed trying to help these retrograde elements of Islam that have immigrated to Europe. I don’t know if it is an issue yet in the US. Elaine Supkis, Red Ice, Stephan Molyneux, and Ben Shapiro have talked about this issue in a number of interviews/blogs/podcasts. Based upon what I’ve heard, if I could break it down to one sentence, the faux feminists and the retrograde Islamists hate western civilization for different reasons (white patriarchy or apostate nations) and are willing to work together to bring about the end of it.

        The position of some of these feminists is glaringly inconsistent and illogical. There were no demonstrations against Bush and Obama bombing Muslims for 16 years and now they are incensed that Trump is supposedly not letting them in. They deny or are ignorant of the existence of radical Muslims within the immiigrants that have immigrated to Europe and deny the crimes that are being committed against women in Europe by immigrants. And they apparently are unaware of or ignore the aspects of Sharia Law that are directly antithetical to the rights that women have in the west. They are being tricked into potentially enslaving themselves. Here are a couple of links on the issue.

        Chad

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqIYznUlwtA

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FluvpeD6lhQ

        1. Chad:

          It is not my scope to dive into this aspect. I am interested in figuring out who is manipulating the game that this is a part of – they are no doubt on both sides. Trillions in equity values and money involved. I also think that entrainment technology is an important part of what is being used to manipulate folks iike this. I am working on a major webinar series with our Dutch allies on these technologies – stay tuned. So my contribution is to bring transparency to the deeper game. Ultimately I think that is the way to pull the rug out of the game itself. Getting embroiled in the women issues will use a lot of time and IMO will contribute no progress if I do it without the deeper game context.

          Catherine

  4. FYI, Catherine. You may have seen this one, but it is another interview of Steele. I think in this one the interviewer does a very good job of eliciting more detailed information from him about the problems he sees and his proposed solutions. As much as I abhor people getting away with crimes, I think at this point some type of truth and reconciliation is the way to go. We can’t arrest our selves out of this problem; the system could not handle it effectively and it would take years to play out. That’s time that I think we don’t have. Once the truth is out, the bad guys would be shamed and perhaps be subject to civil lawsuits by victims. That would be good enough for me provided real, effective reform was done to reboot our system.

    Chad

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTMjjwZxaDg

  5. FYI, Catherine. You’re right. The lawlessness extends from top to bottom. Crime begets more crime and if a system is not set up and administered properly, it tempts normally good people to commit crimes, which often puts them in the position of interfacing with bad people. The dysfunctional immigration system is a perfect example. It’s bad for everyone, except for those who don’t like borders and nations.

    Chad

    http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/02/05/california-state-senate-leader-family-illegal-false-documents-deportation/

    1. At some point the lawlessness is so systemic we have forgotten what the law is. Got to get reality and the law back in alignment if we are going to have a human society.

    1. Holy smokes. Will repost and circulate. Pumping a lot of money in…there is your money for infrastructure.

  7. Here’s a recent video of Jon Rappoport telling us that if Robert Kennedy, Jr. is allowed to proceed and fully investigate the vaccine industry, that this will represent a major shift in everyone’s consciousness, and in their awareness of all the harm that this industry has done to us.

    In addition, Jon is looking quite like Abraham Lincoln in this video. 🙂

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfa-AiOSEIA

Comments are closed.