Post your comments and questions for February, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

118 Comments

  1. This is helpful, thanks.
    From the Solari “About Us” tab:
    “Our mission is to help you build wealth in ways that build real wealth in the wider economy. We believe that personal and family wealth is a critical ingredient of both individual freedom and community health and wealth.”
    To paraphrase, Solari aims to help individuals and families build wealth, which enkindles personal sovereignty, virtue, and optimal return on “life equity”.
    Since “wealth building” is Solari’s mission, this helps explain your frequent comment, “If we really want to fix the system, we first have to fix the money”. Which is to suggest debt-based Federal Reserve money covertly co-opts the natural function of money as a wealth-building tool, ultimately capturing the sovereignty of both states and individual citizens.
    Big problem, especially if – as you say – nothing can get fixed until the money gets fixed.
    Which begs the question: Will the self-proclaimed sovereignist Team Trump return us to some form of sovereign Constitutional money immune from the clutches of the banksters?
    I don’t see it; but hopefully you visualize some brighter prospect.

    1. You are correct. A root problem is that the Fed system is at the heart of the drain, particularly when combined with a Treasury/ESF operation that functions out of compliance with the Constitutional and financial management laws and NY Fed member banks and IT providers that are happy to transact illegal transactions. So it must be dealt with. The Trump team as far as I know has been silent on that – in part, I assume, because every President who tried to deal with it has been assassinated or had an attempted assassination. To deal with this issue effectively you must also deal with the fact that the IT/communications systems have no integrity – so you have to do the financial and information systems at the same time. If you try to deal with the financial system problems while your competitors can listen to everything you do and say and entrain your minds, it is a bit of a competitive disadvantage.

      1. On a positive note, I believe that the law provides you with all the mechanisms needed to move things back to a sound financial system. The great secret is if we do the wealth creation potential is fantastic. The chief thing that has movement stuck is not understanding the legitimate needs, if any, behind the black budget. What are we dealing with in terms of REAL risk management. Who is really running things and what risks are they managing. Foolhardy to ask those questions without knowing our you are going to handle those risks – whatever they are. The other thing that has this stuck is failure of citizens to act – why has everyone failed to pull their accounts from the big banks? There are millions of things we could be doing and we are not. I find that I am constantly lobbied to contribute more time to helping solve these problems by people who will not take action themselves and continue to finance the banks and other organizations that are causing the problems. I suspect that entrainment and various mind control technologies have something to do with it.

        1. On a macabre note, insiders sometime say to me that the American people can not handle the truth. My response is that if you are going to destroy and depopulate the responsible and nice people under the existing trajectory, why not tell the American people the truth, thus depopulating the ones who can’t handle it. Has always seemed the preferable option to me. But then I don’t have the full story other what I can guestimate as possible options.

          1. To me the majority of the American people are very naive, and are much more trusting of their government and their media than is really warranted. Then again, the propaganda is so good, and people have a tough time believing that the massive lies that are being told to us could even be possible.

            I once heard a top marketing expert say, “If you’re marketing your product or service to the American people, recognize that you’re marketing to Homer Simpson.”

            I guess that’s one reason why the TV show has lasted so long, and is now in its 28th season.

            It seems to me that the people of Western Europe are less trusting of both their governments and their media. Has this been your experience?

          2. No. They are closer to people in the government, have more confidence in their ability to impact things, understand much more about how the money works around them, but are skeptical of the possibilities of certain changes. Their infrastructure, benefits are much more reliable and higher quality then here. The incoherent, high rate of entropy of enforcement is less. The centralization and rule making is also driving them crazy. Less organized crime.

          3. This is why place based feedback loops are so important. Homer Simpson who has had to balance his budget and compete in the marketplace for the last 30 years, is better at optimizing his local economy that a Harvard grad with an in IQ of 150 who has been living and working in LA LA land.

          4. Thanks, Catherine. Speaking of La La Land, this year’s Academy Awards ceremony had the lowest TV ratings of any of their ceremonies since 2009. I used to watch the ceremonies, but I’ve completely lost interest. The movies that get nominated nowadays have subject matter that I’m generally not interested in, and that entire industry seems to have lost a lot of class. I much prefer good documentaries nowadays, or movies that I can really learn something important from.

          5. There is a fundamental trust that has been broken between Hollywood and the media and the American people. They crossed the line between news and entertainment and entertainment and media. ABC was the network streaming them. I looked at the red carpet section of the ABC website last night. The sponsor? Wal-Mart. Now, I thought that was interesting.

          6. Jim:

            May be the same conflict we see in DC and Silicon Valley. Hollywood can make movies the backers want financed and promoted. That is different than what adds value to people’s lives and which they want to watch. Financier driven, not market driven.

            Catherine

  2. Patriotic (Bannon et al.) vs. Individual (Solari focus) sovereignty … Helpful distinction!
    It sounds like you are saying Breitbart/Bannon is more likely focused on “culture wars” and the “Washington political scene”. In other words, cultural/country sovereignty. Bannon’s CPAC comments definitely reflect that mindset.
    By contrast, Solari is focused on personal, individual sovereignty … most importantly in terms of maximum individual freedom and immunity from being subjected to relentless harvest by elitist parasites … optimizing sovereignty in terms of health, time, and treasure. (For some reason, your term “turtling” comes to mind.)
    Since sovereignty at any level cannot exist without the cornerstone of individual sovereignty and one’s intimate relationship with the ultimate sovereign, the Creator, I strongly suspect the distinction you are making needs to be part of the public consciousness if there is any prospect of humanity regaining a broad measure of sovereignty.
    More please …

    1. Jim:

      I got to this place by focusing on what would produce a positive return on both financial and living equity. NO MATERIAL OMISSIONS. Breitbart (with Bannon in the lead) avoided many topics that are essential to airing to achieve real solutions. So I will not be constrained by the official reality just to achieve an audience or to avoid being laughed at. Performance at a real solutions level vs. Social Prestige/popularity. I seek to be an honest broker which means I have to say I don’t know a lot and I have to go down a lot of rabbit holes trying to estimate out the real economics and facts of our situation.

      My loyalty is first and foremost to my team and my subscribers and clients. They take responsibility – for themselves, for those around them and for the environment. All solutions require their knowledge, power and situation improving. So that is where I start.

      Ultimately, the question in any system is who governs? I don’t see a way to create governments that will not be corrupted. Consequently, while we need governments to handle a variety of functions, citizens taking responsibility to enforce with their individual virtue, their time, their money is ultimately where the real power lies. This is why the management of retail and institutional capital has the potential to be the real tie breaker. Pensions and sovereign wealth funds benefit when we run the overall economy to bake pies instead of stealing pies.

      The approaches are not mutually exclusive. We need EVERYONE turning the Titanic, each on the pathway that is for them – as the POTUS would say – the most high energy!

  3. Here’s an interesting Bannon/Priebus chat at CPAC. Posting because Bannon interviews are scarce.
    Whatever the press might say about him, Bannon’s message sounds simple. It’s all about sovereignty. America has lost it, and Team Trump is trying to get it back. (I consider this a rare, but accurate and important, observation.)
    Similar to some of Catherine’s comments, Bannon emphasizes the fiight for sovereignty against the corporatist/globalist state will only get rougher.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkUPWb_TKS0
    Could Steve Bannon be a Solari kind of guy?
    His comments made me think possibly so.

    1. Yes, I saw some of it. I thought I had posted it but I don’t see it under Geopolitical, so will repost.

      I have always assumed that there was likely strong alignment between Bannon and Solari, but have never studied his writings or work seriously.

      Breitbart focused on culture wars and pushed to get attention and change through the Washington political machine. They will not touch a lot of the other material omissions that the corporate media avoid – which must be covered if real solutions are to be found.

      The Solari Report has always focused on personal optimization and risk management of health, time and money. We network with those who seriously wanted to figure out what is going on, then focus on shifting the time and money by helping the individual protect themselves from being harvested spiritually, physically, legally, financially.

      So different focus and approach, but both strongly committed to individual freedom and property rights.

    2. I just found out why it did not posted. It is blocked – I assume by Microsoft Exchange. I have tried to send twice and it bounces back marked as spam. So the link has been marked so it can not spread. Should be up today.

        1. Kelly O’Meara did a good summary of the absence of real science a while back for Insight Magazine. I don’t know if it is still available.

  5. I enjoyed this article written by a woman who had come to the United States from India, and who was working for Google in the Silicon Valley. After “living the good life” with this job for some time, she finally woke up one day and realized that this wasn’t really bringing her happiness, and she decided to leave the job, and move back to India.

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-i-moved-back-india-after-10-years-usa-nupur-dave?trk=eml-email_feed_ecosystem_digest_01-hero-0-null&midToken=AQF1nHE7ld0wVg&fromEmail=fromEmail&ut=1bCJmClOoJoDE1

  7. Catherine…Has Jon Rappoport ever done a Solari Report on all of the fraud that was created around the AIDS epidemic? I know he was onto this very early on, but I was wondering if he had ever spoken to Solari subscribers in detail about this.

Comments are closed.