Post your comments and questions for March, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

87 Comments

  3. Hello Catherine,
    I’m attending an investment conference next week and one of the speakers is Egon von Greyerz of Matterhorn Asset Mgt in Zurich. The name sounds familiar and I wondered did you have a Solari report with him? I tried to locate it on the website but no luck. Maybe it was another person from the same firm.

    1. Egon has not done a Solari Report. I have done an interview on their series which may have inspired the connection.

  4. Dear Catherine –
    What a wild and fun Dolan discussion, thanks!
    Your conviction about the surreptitious reasons for a Constitutional re-write is simply breath-taking in its implications.
    To me, when you say “the debt growth model is over”, it’s largely because America (as well as most of the world) has been totally sacked … ironically via the diabolical global issuance Federal Reserve debt-based US$ so-called “money”, the only visible ledger record of which is a mega trillion $$-denominated liability. All stolen items are hidden away from their rightful owners.
    Not surprisingly, the sociopath crooks are quite sure they robbed the world blind “fair-and-square”, as any accomplished thief would claim. In fact so much so, that they want to do it all over again. Ergo, Constitutional convention (CC) to eliminate the possibility of justice under Constitutional law being rendered. Then, onto the next mega-trillion $$ heist.
    I have two questions about all this:
    1. Does the proposed CC possibly relate to what you have termed the “Rape of Russia II”, in other words to globalists doing to America much like what they did to Russia in the 20th century?
    If so, and the means by which globalists intend to execute the Rape of America is first by clearing the ledger of their precedent larceny via a CC, then should we consider calling this CC plan the “Rape of America II” (i.e., instead of RoR II)? It seems we need to highlight that a monstrous crime has already been committed against America. Not only do the monsters intend to perfect the cover-up via CC, they had so much fun they want to do it all over again.
    Yikes, it’s hair-raising to think that’s what the move for a CC is all about.
    2. During the discussion, Dolan asked you about the possibility of debt repudiation or jubilee on some basis. Basically an open-ended question that might deserve more play.
    In that regard, since globalists want to perfect their crimes by eliminating our Constitutional recourse against their theft (whereby via CC we unwittingly oviate their guilt under the law), might our appropriate, corresponding thrust be to declare the accumulated debt under Rape of America I to be null and void? That is, they can’t steal all our assets with debt-based bankster $$ and then leave us with all the debt.
    Certainly, we could declare all this debt as “odious” ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odious_debt ), especially since the gangsters themselves are flagging their own crimes by trying to stealthily separate the debt from all the hidden assets they stole.
    In summary, I liked Dolan’s debt jubilee question. No telling where your further discussing it might lead.
    Thanks again!

    1. Certainly we have a case the debt was fraudulently induced.

      Yes, a Con-Con is part and parcel of a Rape of America II. When you bring down all the legal and financial controls with a balance sheet full of land and real estate and other assets ripe for the plucking, the Piggies will be out in full force.

  5. FYI, Catherine.

    Chad

    http://www.tedmalloch.com/my-life-behind-the-elite-curtain-as-a-global-sherpa/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCbR3MQa8Ms

    I like some of his ideas in the video, but I question his use of Cargill as an example of virtue. They have been caught price fixing on a number of occasions among other issues. Maybe he means that when Cargill gives their word that they will honor the price fixing agreement, they will do it, lol.

    Here is an interesting site that I found while researching Cargill.

    http://www.greenamerica.org/programs/responsibleshopper/company.cfm?id=200

    1. I have Malloch’s book but have not read yet. Like the other 100 or so in the stack!

      My one personal experience with Cargill was one of their officers was quoted to try to frame me. The officer told my attorney that he never said any such thing. My guess? They were in on the frame. When it failed. They pulled the rug out from their co-conspirator. No honor among thieves.

        1. Wouldn’t work. No one would believe the truth and I am not up for modified hangouts.

          1. Maybe, maybe not. For one, it depends on what genre it was, what aspects of your life were explored, and what the goal of the film was. Two, some people would believe it and would learn from it (your subscribers most likely would). Three, initially, the majority would not, but many would eventually believe it over time. Look at what happened with people’s beliefs surrounding the JFK assassination and 9/11. As you pointed out, you were a real enemy of the state and the fictional version did pretty well at the movies. Again, with the right cast, director, and producer (probably from another country), I think it would be a winner. The main problem would be is that certain forces would try to keep it from being made or released.

            I understand your reservations about a modified/limited hangout, but I would hate to see the perfect become the enemy of the good. It could be the beginning of a more in-depth discussion. In other words, it would be the beginning of talking about your life to a wider audience, not the end.

          2. Understood. A movie must first and foremost be great art – and entertainment. It should convey some valuable insight and inspiration. So sticking to the non-fiction story is not possible, although ideally to the gist of it. Then it does not tell my story. It just uses my story to tell a story.

          3. Maybe if the goal would be to help people see the opportunity of creating enormous wealth by aligning the Popsicle Index and the S&P Index. Nothing affirms a good idea better than the banking and Harvard investment cartel giving their all to destroy it.

  6. FYI, Catherine. While people blather on about global warming impacting us within this century (if you believe the predictions), we have an ongoing massive disaster at Fukushima and not much comes from the MSM. I have noticed that many environmental organizations have been amazingly quiet, also. Maybe we need someone to say that Russia did it and then we could get some decent coverage.

    Chad

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyKkhI_GKkg

    1. I have never felt comfortable doing a Solari Report since there is such a wide range of opinion. My guess is that it is so bad, people are afraid to say anything.

    1. Good one. Trump and his team need to have their own war team. Only way to deal with something like this. I dealt with a team of 20 plus law firm and I saw the mess they could make. This machinery is much worse. At some point this is treason.

      1. I still think the greater risk is on the Republican side. Are we sure Brock is really entirely left?

        1. I agree with Dr. Roberts assessment that Trump declared war without having his troops (cabinet and sub-cabinet picks) assembled. He should have given the speech he gave this week at his inauguration, instead of the one that he did. I’m not being critical of him; the forces arrayed against him are enormous and amazingly ruthless and relentless.

          I would like him to invite you to lunch sometime.

          1. He needs to clean house at the FBI and DOJ pronto. There is way too much foot dragging going on to be just coincidence. The Awan brothers investigation or lack thereof is very stinky along with the Clinton Foundation and Weiner’s e-mails. With something like this, if there are not at least a few hundred agents tasked with investigating these cases, there is something wrong. Search warrants and subpoenas should be flying everywhere.

            I agree, treason is our biggest threat, not terrorism.

          3. The cabinent and subcabinet picks are there to run the agencies and MAGA. He needs a war team as well. Story of Nehemiah. When you rebuild a wall, you have to have a weapon in one hand and a tool in the other. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehemiah
            Always happy to answer the Administrations questions or be helpful where I can. However, I represent you, not the US government. I see my job as making sure you have the truth no matter what. That will always put me off sides with someone managing a centralized system.

Comments are closed.