Post your comments and questions for March, 2017.

Click here to see previous comments and questions.

87 Comments

  1. Thanks to CAF and the Solari.com website, a friend from the Panhandle of Texas contacted me to let me know that her brother had been involved in fighting the fires that killed several firefighters and ranchers attempting to save their livestock. As a result, I contacted a neighbor rancher here in Central Texas who sells hay and he is donating round bale hay for cattle to Panhandle ranchers directly in need. We have had a remarkably wet spring but faced fires across our county in 2011 so we know too well what this means to a business that is always susceptible to ranging market and environmental forces. Fire is always the worst of these. It not only takes your livelihood but can take your life as well.

    I write this only to say that the Solari principle of making America great again through each individual, each community, is alive and well here in Texas. Salude. Meanwhile, anyone interested in making a donation to an organization dedicated to this ranching community can do so to: Working Ranch Cowboys, Texas Farm Bureau, Texas Agricultural Extension, and other charitable organizations assisting those who have lost everything.

    1. BTW, great interview (as usual) on American Watchdog. Our Panhandle friend and I marveled at how we often think we have a handle on “the situation” and then listen to you in an interview and we find ourselves saying, “oh wow, that too”, then realize the interviewer has the same response. BTW, she led me to Clif High and that clearly means one more tangent that has me scratching my head. Trying to determine which 50% could come true… One thing I have learned in these nearly 67 years is that being on the wrong side of guessing the future can be very ugly.

      J

      1. On his current shows, I would guess that the chances of most of Clif’s predictions coming true are less than 1%. Good for stretching your mind. Not good for time or investment allocations.

    2. Jane:

      We will donate and post on the website as our latest donation and say prayers as well.

      Catherine

  2. Oops, my computer went haywire.
    Putin has:
    Banned GMOs
    Made an incredible statement for state sovereignty (Syria)
    Condemned endless vaccines
    Built an impenetrable military
    Gone a long way toward fixing central bank controlled money
    Kicked Soros out of the country
    Re-embraced Orthodox Christianity
    etc. etc.
    We can question his motives all we want. But the facts speak for themselves.
    I think Trump sees this, and wants to adopt that model. That’s why they are both under perpetual siege, and why they continue to bond ever closer.

    1. I spoke with a Russian insider here in Canada who I have known for many years. He says that Putin was headed into a serious internal attack if Clinton had won – the Atlantacists would have reigned supreme.

  3. Again, all fabulously interesting, thanks.
    Per Trump, I suspect he sees his “role” not as a handled chessboard piece, rather something like the master of asymmetric improvisation. That’s the only way he can survive the endless traps set by the Deep State. His “loyal soldiers” can’t help him if he only looks to them; they clearly seek his firebrand leadership, not his consensual yearning.
    His goal seems to be to seize, then control the narrative away from the mind-kontrol masters. Twitter obviously a big arrow in his quiver to deliver direct-connect toward this end. But, to be effective, he has to tune in to the public mindset (i.e., tap his empathy strong suit), and deliver what they feel in their hearts before they are cognitively aware of it.
    Per your question about turning the Red Button Green, I think Trump has no choice but to do it. Again, it may sound crazy, but I he is really just following Putin’s lead. Look what Putin has done:

  4. So, this is really interesting.
    Based on your notes above, it sounds like you place a 0% probability of Trump offering whistle-blower protection under existing law … despite the fact that Trump is clearly the biggest beneficiary of the anonymous Vault 7 whistle-blower download (shielded by Wikileaks, to which Solari just donated $100 in support).
    It’s almost like you are acknowledging that resistance is futile; nonetheless, Solari chooses to be a patron saint of lost causes.
    I would have never expected that answer, which makes me so glad I asked the question.
    For sport, I will take the other side of that bet. I place a >0% probability on Trump giving some (in)direct signal that he will protect whistle-blowers, as per existing law.
    As for the Red Button, we no longer need to wonder who will push it. Putin already did. That’s why he is Public Enemy #1:
    http://russia-insider.com/en/putin-calmly-explains-why-liberals-hate-russia-video/ri19147?utm_source=Russia+Insider+Daily+Headlines&utm_campaign=d414e7a6aa-Russia_Insider_Daily_Headlines11_21_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c626db089c-d414e7a6aa-227205773&ct=t(Russia_Insider_Daily_Headlines11_21_2014)&mc_cid=d414e7a6aa&mc_eid=d4f9da5a20
    Trump is merely following Putin’s lead. I agree with you that Trump is an empath; in that regard, he clearly relates to Putin – as do an ever-expanding list of world leaders – and he will continue to engage him.
    Getting back to the whistle-blower question, Putin singularly gave asylum to Snowden (a CIA whistle-blower), and he said he did it for most of the same reasons that our own whistle-blower protection laws exist.
    In summary, my bet is that there is a greater than 0% chance of Trump surprising us in a positive way. He may well take Putin’s lead.
    Against all conventional wisdom, whistle-blowers – like you – may finally be recognized and revered for the heroes they are.

    1. I think you misunderstand.

      Trump is playing a role on the chessboard. He has to optimize his position. Protecting Snowden or Assange openly would have a devastating impact on my loyal soldiers he is depending on.

      However, given the timing of his comments on Sweden or his being taped, it appears he may be front running the actions of his own syndicate.

      Meantime, if you are going to turn the red button green – a condition precedent to hitting the red button you have to do those things. It would be unlikely for a President to cold turkey

      Would you?

      You should read the details of my case at http://dunwalke.com/gideon – I was NOT a whistleblower. I was the TARGET of a whistleblower. Whistleblowers are often used to destroy the people who are most competent and honest.

      IMO, Putin protected Snowden because the factions in the west supporting Putin arranged for him to do it .Things are much murkier than they seem.

      Just like the Russians tried to trick me out of my settlement – my guess because they were the #2 Fannie Mae holders.

  5. I thought the Whistleblower Protection Act is a law to supposedly protect whistle-blowers
    (https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/whistleblower) …
    not leakers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_leak).
    Apparently, I’m missing some nuance, and there’s a (blurred?) line between “leaking” and “whistle-blowing”.
    Anyway, per your Binney/Wiebe nod, maybe Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer would to be a good helper also. For example, this Binney/Shaffer clip is breath-taking:
    http://theduran.com/explosive-nsa-whistleblower-and-us-lieutenant-colonel-tell-fox-news-cia-hacked-dnc-with-russias-fingerprints/

    1. Jim:

      The entire economic model of the US government is to run organized crime globally. How is the President supposed to operate if there is no line management authority?

      Most of what the government does is unconstitutional and illegal. They have refused to produce audited financial statements are required by law for two decades. THERE WERE $6.5 TRILLION OF UNDOCUMENTABLE ADJUSTMENTS last year at DOD>

      Watch the Bed Button story.

      You are missing something. I think it is so big and so in your face that you are having difficulty getting your perspective.

  6. Catherine –
    I noticed you described Trump – to the amazement of Richard Dolan – as “an empath”.
    Also, Solari recently donated $100 to support Wikileaks, the clearing house and distribution network for whistle blowers.
    As an alpha grade whistle-blower who has withstood horrific abuse from the sociopath Ruling Class, do you think there’s any prospect that our new Empath-in-Chief might tweet some expression of support for whistle-blowers?
    Or maybe that he simply directs the government to abide by the intent and enforce the Whistle Blower Protection Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower_Protection_Act )?
    After all, no one stands to to be vindicated more by the release of Vault7 than our besieged President. As an empath, he has to feel that.
    I know that Trump has spoken harshly of Snowden (and maybe others). But he has unwittingly been cast in the role of quasi whistle-blower, himself. So, just curious how you see this drama proceeding , given your experience and your comments.
    Thanks.

    1. Jim:

      As President, Trump must support the law, so he must be anti-leaking. He needs to support the good soldiers in place doing their job. I don’t see any way around it. That said, he must grapple with the issue of how we bring integrity to our digital systems.

      If I were him, I would hire William Binney and Kirk Wiebe to help him do that.

      Catherine

Comments are closed.